Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Modern Optics

Letter Experimental demonstration of polarization discrimination at the Helstrom bound

Stephen Mark Barnett, Erling Riis

Published Jun 1, 1997• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1080/095003497153356

Related papers

Weak Measurements of Photon Polarization

M. Iinuma

光学•Oct 10, 2013•0 citations

Experimental demonstration of polarization discrimination at the Helstrom bound

Stephen Mark Barnett, Erling Riis

We present an experimental realization of discrimination between non-orthogonal polarization states at the Helstrom bound for minimum probability of error. The experiment was performed with highly attenuated laser light with a mean number of about 0·1 photons per pulse.

Journal of Modern Optics•Jun 1, 1997•50 citations

Influence of detector motion on discrimination between photon polarizations

Tao Zhou, Jingxin Cui, Ye Cao

arXiv:1204.5890•Quantum Information Processing•May 10, 2012•1 citation

Minimum-error discrimination of entangled quantum states

Lu Yan, N. Coish, Rainer Kaltenbaek +3 more

Strategies to optimally discriminate between quantum states are critical in quantum technologies. We present an experimental demonstration of minimum-error discrimination between entangled states, encoded in the polarization of pairs of photons. Although the optimal measurement involves projection onto entangled states, we use a result of J. Walgate et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972 (2000)] to design an optical implementation employing only local polarization measurements and feed-forward, which performs at the Helstrom bound. Our scheme can achieve perfect discrimination of orthogonal states and minimum-error discrimination of nonorthogonal states. Our experimental results show a definite advantage over schemes not using feed-forward.

arXiv:1008.0843•Physical Review A•Oct 29, 2010•18 citations

Violating the modified Helstrom bound with nonprojective measurements

Justin Dressel, Todd A. Brun, Alexander N. Korotkov

We consider the discrimination of two pure quantum states with three allowed outcomes: a correct guess, an incorrect guess, and a nonguess. To find an optimum measurement procedure, we define a tunable cost that penalizes the incorrect guess and nonguess outcomes. Minimizing this cost over all projective measurements produces a rigorous cost bound that includes the usual Helstrom discrimination bound as a special case. We then show that nonprojective measurements can outperform this modified Helstrom bound for certain choices of cost function. The Ivanovic-Dieks-Peres unambiguous state discrimination protocol is recovered as a special case of this improvement. Notably, while the cost advantage of the latter protocol is destroyed with the introduction of any amount of experimental noise, other choices of cost function have optima for which nonprojective measurements robustly show an appreciable, and thus experimentally measurable, cost advantage. Such an experiment would be an unambiguous demonstration of a benefit from nonprojective measurements.

arXiv:1410.0096•Physical Review A•Apr 6, 2015•3 citations

Experimental display of the extended polarization coherence theorem

Fabio Joel Auccapuclla Quispe

•Jun 5, 2019•0 citations
Strategies to optimally discriminate between quantum states are critical in quantum technologies. We present an experimental demonstration of minimum-error discrimination between entangled states, encoded in the polarization of pairs of photons. Although the optimal measurement involves projection onto entangled states, we use a result of J. Walgate et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4972 (2000)] to design an optical implementation employing only local polarization measurements and feed-forward, which performs at the Helstrom bound. Our scheme can achieve perfect discrimination of orthogonal states and minimum-error discrimination of nonorthogonal states. Our experimental results show a definite advantage over schemes not using feed-forward.
We consider the discrimination of two pure quantum states with three allowed outcomes: a correct guess, an incorrect guess, and a nonguess. To find an optimum measurement procedure, we define a tunable cost that penalizes the incorrect guess and nonguess outcomes. Minimizing this cost over all projective measurements produces a rigorous cost bound that includes the usual Helstrom discrimination bound as a special case. We then show that nonprojective measurements can outperform this modified Helstrom bound for certain choices of cost function. The Ivanovic-Dieks-Peres unambiguous state discrimination protocol is recovered as a special case of this improvement. Notably, while the cost advantage of the latter protocol is destroyed with the introduction of any amount of experimental noise, other choices of cost function have optima for which nonprojective measurements robustly show an appreciable, and thus experimentally measurable, cost advantage. Such an experiment would be an unambiguous demonstration of a benefit from nonprojective measurements.