Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

How Different Nonadiabatic Tunneling Is from the Ordinary Tunneling

Published Sep 26, 2019• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789811203428_0005

Related papers

Nonadiabatic effect in laser-induced quantum tunneling

Min Li, Kunlong Liu, Siqiang Luo +6 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 30, 2019•0 citations

Coherent Tunneling by Nonadiabatic Passage in a Three-Waveguide Coupler

Shi Jian, Rui-Qiong Ma, Lin Liu

We propose a nonadiabatic tunneling technique, which is different from the stimulated Raman adiabatic passage, to improve the optical tunneling efficiency of a three-waveguide system. The theoretical calculations and results show that the tunneling efficiency can reach 100%. The exact analytic solutions to the nonadiabatic tunneling dynamics are presented. Light dynamics in the optical coupler enable a direct visualization of the population transfer of atomic system under generalized π pulses technique.

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•May 26, 2020•1 citation

Universal Behavior of Tunneling Time and Barrier Time-Delay Decoupling in Attoclock Measurements

Ossama Kullie

The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.

arXiv:2402.14431•Feb 22, 2024•0 citations

THEORETICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN SEMI-CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM TUNNELING EFFECT

Fulvio Frisone

International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science (ICCF)•Dec 1, 2006•1 citation

Universal behavior of tunneling time and barrier time-delay decoupling in attoclock measurements

Ossama Kullie

The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.

•Feb 11, 2025•0 citations

Some Basic Questions Concerning Quantum Tunneling

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations
We propose a nonadiabatic tunneling technique, which is different from the stimulated Raman adiabatic passage, to improve the optical tunneling efficiency of a three-waveguide system. The theoretical calculations and results show that the tunneling efficiency can reach 100%. The exact analytic solutions to the nonadiabatic tunneling dynamics are presented. Light dynamics in the optical coupler enable a direct visualization of the population transfer of atomic system under generalized π pulses technique.
The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.
The measurement of the tunneling time-delay is hotly debated and remains controversial. In previous works, we showed that a model that accurately describes the time-delay measured by the attoclock experiment in adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations. In the present work, we show that the tunneling time reveals a universal behavior with disentangled contributions. Even more remarkable is that the barrier tunneling time-delay can be convincingly defined and determined from the difference between the time-delay of adiabatic and nonadiabatic tunnel-ionization, which also show good agreement with experimental results. Furthermore, we illustrate that in the weak measurement limit, the barrier time-delay corresponds to the Larmor-clock time and the interaction time within the barrier.