Beyond Understanding

Lahiru J. Ekanayake

Kurt Gottfried, Tung‐Mow Yan

Alexei S. Trifonov

Farhan Saif, Shinichi Watanabe

In general, experimental systems are beyond one-dimensional ideal scenarios, where composite forces act and interactions take place between higher dimensions. In order to understand the associated subtleties in the quantum domain, we first must understand them in the classical domain.

Gösta Fürnkranz

Christian DE RONDE

Quantum Mechanics (QM) has faced deep controversies and debates since its origin when Werner Heisenberg proposed the first mathematical formalism capable to operationally account for what had been recently discovered as the new field of quantum phenomena. Today, even though we have reached a standardized version of QM which is taught in Universities all around the world, there is still no consensus regarding the conceptual reference of the theory and, if or if not, it can refer to something beyond measurement outcomes. In this work we will argue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer to this question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivist re-foundation of physics which is responsible for having introduced within the theory of quanta a harmful combination of metaphysical dogmatism and naive empiricism. We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is at plain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which the meaning of understanding has always been clear.