Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

On the determinism of hidden variable theories with strict correlation and conditional statistical independence of observables

Patrick Suppes, Mario Zanotti

Published Nov 13, 1996• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The main purpose of this chapter is to prove a lemma about random variables, and then to apply this lemma to the characterization of local theories of hidden variables by Bell (1964, 1966) and Wigner (1970), which are focused around Bell's inequality. We use the results of the lemma in two different ways. The first is to show that the assumptions of Bell and Wigner can be weakened to conditional statistical independence rather than conditional determinism because determinism follows from conditional independence and the other assumptions that are made about systems of two spin-½ particles. The second direction is to question the attempt of Clauser and Home (1974) to derive a Bell-type inequality for local stochastic theories of hidden variables which use an assumption of conditional statistical independence for observables. The main thrust of our analysis obviously arises from the probabilistic lemma we prove. Roughly speaking, this lemma asserts that if two random variables have strict correlation, that is, the absolute value of the correlation is one, and it is in addition assumed that their expectations are conditionally independent when a third random variable λ is given, then the conditional variance of X and Y given λ is zero. In other words, given the hidden variable λ the observables X and Y are strictly determined. The lemma itself, of course, depends on no assumptions about quantum mechanics. It may be regarded as a limitation on any theories that assume both strict correlation between observables and their conditional independence on the basis of some prior or hidden variable.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9781139172639.008

Related papers

A new proof of the impossibility of hidden variables using the principles of exchangeability and identity of conditional distributions

Patrick Suppes, Mario Zanotti

The main purpose of this paper is to provide a new proof of the impossibility of local theories of hidden variables based on simpler and more general assumptions than those used by Bell (1964, 1966), Wigner (1970), and Suppes and Zanotti (1976). In particular, no assumptions requiring specific quantum mechanical calculations are required. They are replaced by the principle of exchangeability and the principle of identical conditional distributions given the hidden variable. The results may be most easily discussed in terms of a system of two spin-½ particles initially in the singlet state, but generalizations to other quantum mechanical systems of a similar nature are apparent. In essential terms, the analysis of Bell, stated in a particularly clear form by Wigner, depends upon the following assumptions, which we state in intuitive form. (Mathematically explicit axioms are formulated in Appendix A.) 1. Axial symmetry . For any direction of the measuring apparatus the expected spin is 0, where spin is measured by +1 and -1 for spin +½ and spin -½, respectively. Further, the expected product of the spin measurements is the same for different orientations of the measuring apparatuses, as long as the angle between the measuring apparatuses remains the same. 2. Opposite measurement for same orientation . The correlation between the spin measurements is – 1 if the two measuring apparatuses have the same orientation. 3. Independence of λ . The expectation of any function of λ is independent of the orientation of the measuring apparatus.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 13, 1996•5 citations

Conditional Independence Leads to Satisfaction of the Bell Inequality without Assuming Non-Locality or Non-Reality

Louis Sica

The original Bell inequality was obtained in a statistical derivation assuming three mutually cross-correlated random variables (four in the later version). Given that observations destroy the particles, the physical realization of three variables from an experiment producing two particles per trial requires two separate trial runs. One assumed variable value (for particle 1) occurs at a fixed instrument setting in both trial runs while a second variable (for particle 2) occurs at alternative instrument settings in the two trial runs. Given that measurements on the two particles occurring in each trial are themselves correlated, measurements from independent realizations at mutually exclusive settings on particle 2 are conditionally independent, i.e., conditionally dependent on particle 1, through probability. This situation is realized from variables defined by Bell using entangled particle pairs. Two correlations have the form that Bell computed from entanglement, but a third correlation from conditionally independent measurements has a different form. When the correlations are computed using quantum probabilities, the Bell inequality is satisfied without recourse to assumptions of non-locality, or non-reality.

Advances in Pure Mathematics•Jan 1, 2022•3 citations

Single-particle Bell-type Inequality

Afshin Shafiee, Mehdi Golshani

It is generally believed that Bell's inequality holds for the case of entangled states, including two correlated particles or special states of a single particle. Here, we derive a single-particle Bell's inequality for two correlated spin states at two successive times, appealing to the statistical independence condition in an ideal experiment, for a locally causal hidden variables theory. We show that regardless of the locality assumption, the inequality can be violated by some quantum predictions.

arXiv:quant-ph/9907017•Annales de la fondation Louis de Broglie/Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie•Jul 6, 1999•5 citations

Quantum nonlocality and Bell's inequalities

de Wm Willem Muynck, Willy De Baere

A number of additional assumptions is discussed playing a role in derivations of the Bell inequalities along with the locality condition. An analogy between quantum mechanics and statistical thermodynamics is exploited to demonstrate that the ex istence of conditional probabilities p(ai|,Lambda)generally assumed in stochastic hidden variables theories, may be questionable within the domain of application of quan tum mechanics. It is demonstrated how this could block derivations of the Bell inequalities and of the Kochen-Specker theorem. The analogy also provides a pos sible understanding of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics as evidenced by the Borchers-Schlieder theorem.

Annals of the Israel Physical Society•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Relaxed Bell inequality as a trade-off relation between measurement dependence and hiddenness

Gen Kimura, Yugo Susuki, Kei Morisue

Quantum correlations that violate the Bell inequality cannot be explained by any local-hidden-variable theory that is measurement independent. However, this violation merely signifies the incompatibility of the underlying assumptions of reality, locality, and measurement independence, without providing a quantitative measure of the extent to which each assumption is violated. In contrast, Hall introduced a measure for each of the following assumptions: indeterminism, signaling, and measurement dependence, and Hall also generalized the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality, which provides a quantitative trade-off relationship between these assumptions. In this paper, we consider the introduction of hidden variables to be an essential assumption of Bell's theorem and introduce a quantification of hidden variables, which we term ``hiddenness.'' We derive a trade-off relation between hiddenness and measurement dependence that applies to any local-hidden-variable theory.

arXiv:2206.06196•Physical Review A•Aug 18, 2023•7 citations

Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories

Abner Shimony

The study of hidden-variable interpretations of quantum mechanics was transformed by two papers of Bell. In his 1966 paper in Reviews of Modern Physics [1] he analysed the argument of von Neumann [2] and the more powerful arguments of Jauch and Piron [3] and of Gleason [4], all leading to similar conclusions about the nonassignability of simultaneous values to all the observables of a nontrivial quantum system; and he showed that these arguments do not exclude what may be called “contextualistic” hidden-variable theories, in which the value of an observable O is allowed to depend not only upon the hidden state λ, but also upon the set C of compatible observables measured along with O . In Bell's 1964 paper in Physics [5] (written later than the other, in spite of the earlier publication date) he gave a new kind of argument against a hidden-variable interpretation of quantum mechanics, by showing that no hidden-variables theory which satisfies a certain condition of locality can agree with all the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics. The main purpose of this lecture is to discuss an experiment, designed by Clauser, Horne, Holt and myself [6], which is based on Bell's proof of the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and local hidden-variable theories. Before doing this, however, I wish to make several comments.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 26, 1993•115 citations
INTRODUCTION The main purpose of this chapter is to prove a lemma about random variables, and then to apply this lemma to the characterization of local theories of hidden variables by Bell (1964, 1966) and Wigner (1970), which are focused around Bell's inequality. We use the results of the lemma in two different ways. The first is to show that the assumptions of Bell and Wigner can be weakened to conditional statistical independence rather than conditional determinism because determinism follows from conditional independence and the other assumptions that are made about systems of two spin-½ particles. The second direction is to question the attempt of Clauser and Home (1974) to derive a Bell-type inequality for local stochastic theories of hidden variables which use an assumption of conditional statistical independence for observables. The main thrust of our analysis obviously arises from the probabilistic lemma we prove. Roughly speaking, this lemma asserts that if two random variables have strict correlation, that is, the absolute value of the correlation is one, and it is in addition assumed that their expectations are conditionally independent when a third random variable λ is given, then the conditional variance of X and Y given λ is zero. In other words, given the hidden variable λ the observables X and Y are strictly determined. The lemma itself, of course, depends on no assumptions about quantum mechanics. It may be regarded as a limitation on any theories that assume both strict correlation between observables and their conditional independence on the basis of some prior or hidden variable.
The main purpose of this paper is to provide a new proof of the impossibility of local theories of hidden variables based on simpler and more general assumptions than those used by Bell (1964, 1966), Wigner (1970), and Suppes and Zanotti (1976). In particular, no assumptions requiring specific quantum mechanical calculations are required. They are replaced by the principle of exchangeability and the principle of identical conditional distributions given the hidden variable. The results may be most easily discussed in terms of a system of two spin-½ particles initially in the singlet state, but generalizations to other quantum mechanical systems of a similar nature are apparent. In essential terms, the analysis of Bell, stated in a particularly clear form by Wigner, depends upon the following assumptions, which we state in intuitive form. (Mathematically explicit axioms are formulated in Appendix A.) 1. Axial symmetry . For any direction of the measuring apparatus the expected spin is 0, where spin is measured by +1 and -1 for spin +½ and spin -½, respectively. Further, the expected product of the spin measurements is the same for different orientations of the measuring apparatuses, as long as the angle between the measuring apparatuses remains the same. 2. Opposite measurement for same orientation . The correlation between the spin measurements is – 1 if the two measuring apparatuses have the same orientation. 3. Independence of λ . The expectation of any function of λ is independent of the orientation of the measuring apparatus.
The original Bell inequality was obtained in a statistical derivation assuming three mutually cross-correlated random variables (four in the later version). Given that observations destroy the particles, the physical realization of three variables from an experiment producing two particles per trial requires two separate trial runs. One assumed variable value (for particle 1) occurs at a fixed instrument setting in both trial runs while a second variable (for particle 2) occurs at alternative instrument settings in the two trial runs. Given that measurements on the two particles occurring in each trial are themselves correlated, measurements from independent realizations at mutually exclusive settings on particle 2 are conditionally independent, i.e., conditionally dependent on particle 1, through probability. This situation is realized from variables defined by Bell using entangled particle pairs. Two correlations have the form that Bell computed from entanglement, but a third correlation from conditionally independent measurements has a different form. When the correlations are computed using quantum probabilities, the Bell inequality is satisfied without recourse to assumptions of non-locality, or non-reality.
It is generally believed that Bell's inequality holds for the case of entangled states, including two correlated particles or special states of a single particle. Here, we derive a single-particle Bell's inequality for two correlated spin states at two successive times, appealing to the statistical independence condition in an ideal experiment, for a locally causal hidden variables theory. We show that regardless of the locality assumption, the inequality can be violated by some quantum predictions.
A number of additional assumptions is discussed playing a role in derivations of the Bell inequalities along with the locality condition. An analogy between quantum mechanics and statistical thermodynamics is exploited to demonstrate that the ex istence of conditional probabilities p(ai|,Lambda)generally assumed in stochastic hidden variables theories, may be questionable within the domain of application of quan tum mechanics. It is demonstrated how this could block derivations of the Bell inequalities and of the Kochen-Specker theorem. The analogy also provides a pos sible understanding of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics as evidenced by the Borchers-Schlieder theorem.
Quantum correlations that violate the Bell inequality cannot be explained by any local-hidden-variable theory that is measurement independent. However, this violation merely signifies the incompatibility of the underlying assumptions of reality, locality, and measurement independence, without providing a quantitative measure of the extent to which each assumption is violated. In contrast, Hall introduced a measure for each of the following assumptions: indeterminism, signaling, and measurement dependence, and Hall also generalized the Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality, which provides a quantitative trade-off relationship between these assumptions. In this paper, we consider the introduction of hidden variables to be an essential assumption of Bell's theorem and introduce a quantification of hidden variables, which we term ``hiddenness.'' We derive a trade-off relation between hiddenness and measurement dependence that applies to any local-hidden-variable theory.
The study of hidden-variable interpretations of quantum mechanics was transformed by two papers of Bell. In his 1966 paper in Reviews of Modern Physics [1] he analysed the argument of von Neumann [2] and the more powerful arguments of Jauch and Piron [3] and of Gleason [4], all leading to similar conclusions about the nonassignability of simultaneous values to all the observables of a nontrivial quantum system; and he showed that these arguments do not exclude what may be called “contextualistic” hidden-variable theories, in which the value of an observable O is allowed to depend not only upon the hidden state λ, but also upon the set C of compatible observables measured along with O . In Bell's 1964 paper in Physics [5] (written later than the other, in spite of the earlier publication date) he gave a new kind of argument against a hidden-variable interpretation of quantum mechanics, by showing that no hidden-variables theory which satisfies a certain condition of locality can agree with all the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics. The main purpose of this lecture is to discuss an experiment, designed by Clauser, Horne, Holt and myself [6], which is based on Bell's proof of the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and local hidden-variable theories. Before doing this, however, I wish to make several comments.