Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Magnetic Properties of Some Itinerant-Electron Systems at T > 0

Élliott H. Lieb, Michael Aizenman

Published Jan 1, 2002• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-55925-9_10

Related papers

Magnetic Properties of Some Itinerant-Electron Systems at T > 0

Michael Aizenman, Élliott H. Lieb

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

An itinerant electron model with crystalline or magnetic long range order

Tom Kennedy, Élliott H. Lieb

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Sep 1, 1986•254 citations

Nontrivial magnetic order: Localized versus itinerant systems (invited) (abstract)

L. P. Gor’kov, Alexander Sokol

Recently the interest in non-Neel ground states for antiferromagnetically interacting localized spin systems has been revived. We discuss to what extent the generalization of such states is possible for itinerant electrons. Multiple spin correlation functions can be used to enumerate nontrivial order parameters for localized spins. This approach can be applied to itinerant systems without any modification. However, for the transition which breaks translational symmetry, electronic states far away from the Fermi surface are important and, hence, there is no distinct energetic mechanism for the nontrivial magnetic ordering. The only exception is the Fermi surface with the nesting property. As it is shown, among all phases known for localized spins only p-type spin nematic and chiral spin states can appear as a result of a Fermi liquid breakdown with respect to the electron-hole condensation near the Fermi surface. All other phases with zero local average spin known for localized systems, either are accompanied by the charge density wave or persistent orbital currents creating orbital magnetic moments, or can not appear as a result of a phase transition driven by such mechanism. Although two aforementioned phases are equivalent to their counterparts for localized spins from the symmetry viewpoint, the driving order parameter in an itinerant case is not a multiple spin average, but a wave function of the electron-hole condensate.

Journal of Applied Physics•May 15, 1993•0 citations

Ferromagnetism in an itinerant electron system

D. F. Wang

Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation•Jul 1, 1996•0 citations

Gaussian-Basis Monte Carlo Method for Numerical Study on Ground States of Itinerant and Strongly Correlated Electron Systems(Condensed matter: electronic structure and electrical, magnetic, and optical properties)

Takeshi Aimi, Masatoshi Imada

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Aug 15, 2007•0 citations

Magnetic properties of a one-dimensional interacting Fermi system

G. I. Japaridze, A. A. Nersesyan

Physics Letters A•Sep 1, 1981•20 citations
Recently the interest in non-Neel ground states for antiferromagnetically interacting localized spin systems has been revived. We discuss to what extent the generalization of such states is possible for itinerant electrons. Multiple spin correlation functions can be used to enumerate nontrivial order parameters for localized spins. This approach can be applied to itinerant systems without any modification. However, for the transition which breaks translational symmetry, electronic states far away from the Fermi surface are important and, hence, there is no distinct energetic mechanism for the nontrivial magnetic ordering. The only exception is the Fermi surface with the nesting property. As it is shown, among all phases known for localized spins only p-type spin nematic and chiral spin states can appear as a result of a Fermi liquid breakdown with respect to the electron-hole condensation near the Fermi surface. All other phases with zero local average spin known for localized systems, either are accompanied by the charge density wave or persistent orbital currents creating orbital magnetic moments, or can not appear as a result of a phase transition driven by such mechanism. Although two aforementioned phases are equivalent to their counterparts for localized spins from the symmetry viewpoint, the driving order parameter in an itinerant case is not a multiple spin average, but a wave function of the electron-hole condensate.