Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Notes on Quaternion Quantum Mechanics Part I

David Finkelstein, J. M. Jauch, David Speiser

Published Jan 1, 1979• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-009-9351-8_15

Related papers

Notes on quaternion quantum mechanics, pt.1

David Speiser, David Finkelstein, J. M. Jauch

CERN eBooks•Jan 1, 1959•38 citations

Remarks on quaternion quantum mechanics

František Jenč

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 1966•3 citations

Quaternions in Quantum Mechanics

W. S. Anglin, Jim Lambek

Undergraduate texts in mathematics•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

Quaternion Quantum Mechanics Demystified

Douglas Sweetser

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Apr 9, 2011•0 citations

Holonomy in Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics

Jerzy Dajka, M. Szopa

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•May 1, 2003•1 citation

Quaternionic Dirac equation

A. J. Davies

The quaternionic generalization of the Dirac equation is investigated. From elementary considerations of unitarity and Lorentz invariance it is demonstrated that potentials with quaternionic parts are not consistent with representation independence. This result leads to the conclusion that either quaternionic quantum mechanics singles out a special class of Dirac representations, or that allowed potentials appearing in the problem have no j or k components. If the latter alternative is the case, consideration of nonrelativistic wave mechanics casts doubt on the existence of simple experimental tests of quaternionic quantum mechanics.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Apr 15, 1990•91 citations
The quaternionic generalization of the Dirac equation is investigated. From elementary considerations of unitarity and Lorentz invariance it is demonstrated that potentials with quaternionic parts are not consistent with representation independence. This result leads to the conclusion that either quaternionic quantum mechanics singles out a special class of Dirac representations, or that allowed potentials appearing in the problem have no j or k components. If the latter alternative is the case, consideration of nonrelativistic wave mechanics casts doubt on the existence of simple experimental tests of quaternionic quantum mechanics.