Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Composite Systems

Tilak Sinha

Published Jun 18, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this final chapter we discuss composite systems in Quantum Mechanics. First, we lay out the necessary conditions that the state space of a composite system must satisfy by considering the trivial case of two juxtaposed systems. Then we point out the features that the interesting case of a composite system, whose parts interact with each other, must have. We then move to demonstrate how such a system can be naturally described (quantized) by employing tensor product spaces. The definition and the most relevant properties of tensor product spaces are introduced. Then the meaning of “interactions” in quantum mechanics is explored and the most nontrivial aspects of correlation and entanglement are discussed. Finally, in the last section, we introduce systems of identical particles. We describe how to represent the state space of such systems in terms of one-particle states, number operators and occupation number representations. Classification of identical particles into Bosons and Fermions is explained. Finally, introducing symmetric and antisymmetric states, the traditional quantization scheme using the symmetrization postulate is described. The permutation operator is introduced which is the main tool for dealing with identical particle systems in this language. We wind up by indicating how exchange degeneracy is removed which embodies the signature of indistinguishability.

DOI
10.1201/9781003090335-9

Related papers

Entanglement in systems of indistinguishable fermions

Mari Carmen Bañuls, J. I. Cirac, Michael M. Wolf

The characterization of entanglement is a fundamental issue for Quantum Information Theory. But the definition of entanglement depends on the notion of locality, and thus on the tensor product structure of the state space of the composite system. This notion is affected by the presence of superselection rules that restrict the accessible Hilbert space to a direct sum of subspaces. Indistinguishability of particles imposes one such restriction, namely to totally symmetric or totally antisymmetric states. The entanglement can in this case be defined with respect to partitions of modes in the second quantization formalism. For fermionic systems the Fock space of m modes is isomorphic to the space of m qubits, but the action of creation and annihilation operators is not local, due to their anticommutation. Conservation of the parity of fermion number imposes another relevant superselection rule. It requires that local physical observables commute with the local parity operator. Taking into account the considerations above, it is possible to define the set of separable states or equivalently the concept of entanglement for fermionic systems in a number of ways. Here we analyze systematically these possibilities and the relation among the various sets of separable states. We also discuss the behavior of the different classes when taking several copies of the state, as well as the characterization of the sets in terms of the usual criteria regarding the tensor product.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2009•17 citations

Identical Quantum Particles as Distinguishable Objects

Dennis Dieks, Andrea Lubberdink

Abstract According to classical physics particles are basic building blocks of the world. These classical particles are distinguishable objects, individuated by unique combinations of physical properties. By contrast, in quantum mechanics the received view is that particles of the same kind (“identical particles”) are physically indistinguishable from each other and lack identity. This doctrine rests on the quantum mechanical (anti)symmetrization postulates together with the “factorist” assumption that each single particle is represented in exactly one factor space of the tensor product Hilbert space of a many-particle system. Even though standard in theoretical physics and the philosophy of physics, the assumption of factorism and the ensuing indistinguishability of particles are problematic. Particle indistinguishability is irreconcilable with the everyday meaning of “particle”, and also with how this term is used in the practice of physics. Moreover, it is a consequence of the standard view that identical quantum particles remain indistinguishable even in the classical limit, which makes a smooth transition to the classical particle concept impossible. Lubberdink (1998; 2009) and Dieks and Lubberdink (2011) have proposed an alternative conception of quantum particles that does not rely on factorism and avoids these difficulties. We further explain and discuss this alternative framework here. One of its key consequences is that particles in quantum theory are not fundamental but emergent; another that once they have emerged, quantum particles are always physically distinguishable and thus possess a physically grounded identity.

Journal for General Philosophy of Science•Jun 24, 2020•47 citations

Four Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Are Three

Gabriele Carcassi, Lorenzo Maccone, C. Aidala

The tensor product postulate of quantum mechanics states that the Hilbert space of a composite system is the tensor product of the components' Hilbert spaces. All current formalizations of quantum mechanics that do not contain this postulate contain some equivalent postulate or assumption (sometimes hidden). Here we give a natural definition of a composite system as a set containing the component systems and show how one can logically derive the tensor product rule from the state postulate and from the measurement postulate. In other words, our Letter reduces by one the number of postulates necessary to quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2003.11007•Physical Review Letters•Mar 16, 2021•23 citations

- Many-particle Systems

Alastair I. M. Rae, Jim Napolitano

Although many of the principles of quantum mechanics can be adequately illustrated by considering systems that consist of only one particle subject to external forces, there are a number of important phenomena that are manifest only in systems containing two or more particles, and these will be the subject of the present chapter. We shall begin with some general statements and go on to consider the case of two interacting particles subject to no external forces, when we shall find that, in this case, the problem can be separated into one describing the behaviour of the centre of mass of the system and another describing the relative motion. We shall then consider the case of two noninteracting particles and show that these can often be treated independently as would be expected. In the case of indistinguishable particles, however, we shall find that a symmetry is imposed on the wave function that ensures that the behaviour of such particles is coupled even when they do not interact. We shall introduce the problem of interacting systems containing more than two identical particles, explaining what is meant by “fermions” and “bosons” and how their properties compare. These results will be illustrated by discussing the energy levels and optical spectra of the helium atom, starting with the approximation that the two electrons do not interact and extending the discussion to the realistic case using perturbation theory. The chapter closes with a consideration of the effects of particle indistinguishability on scattering theory.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 16, 2015•0 citations

Identical particles

Efstratios Manousakis

Abstract This chapter discusses the case of a many-body system of identical particles. It considers the consequencies of the symmetry of the Hamiltonian under particle permutations in this case. It discusses how to build many-body Boson and Fermion states. It then introduces the formalism of so-called second quantization, which is usefu, in the case of identical particles. It also expresses the many-body Hamiltonian in terms of creation and annihilation operators.

•Nov 1, 2015•0 citations

Second quantization

Yuli V. Nazarov, Jeroen Danon

In this chapter we describe a technique to deal with identical particles that is called second quantization . Despite being a technique, second quantization helps a lot in understanding physics. One can learn and endlessly repeat newspaper-style statements particles are fields , fields are particles without grasping their meaning. Second quantization brings these concepts to an operational level. Since the procedure of second quantization is slightly different for fermions and bosons, we have to treat the two cases separately. We start with considering a system of identical bosons, and introduce creation and annihilation operators (CAPs) that change the number of particles in a given many-particle state, thereby connecting different states in Fock space. We show how to express occupation numbers in terms of CAPs, and then get to the heart of the second quantization: the commutation relations for the bosonic CAPs. As a next step, we construct field operators out of the CAPs and spend quite some time (and energy) presenting the physics of the particles in terms of these field operators. Only afterward, do we explain why all this activity has been called second quantization. In Section 3.4 we then present the same procedure for fermions, and we mainly focus on what is different as compared to bosons. The formalism of second quantization is summarized in Table 3.1.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 3, 2013•0 citations
In this final chapter we discuss composite systems in Quantum Mechanics. First, we lay out the necessary conditions that the state space of a composite system must satisfy by considering the trivial case of two juxtaposed systems. Then we point out the features that the interesting case of a composite system, whose parts interact with each other, must have. We then move to demonstrate how such a system can be naturally described (quantized) by employing tensor product spaces. The definition and the most relevant properties of tensor product spaces are introduced. Then the meaning of “interactions” in quantum mechanics is explored and the most nontrivial aspects of correlation and entanglement are discussed. Finally, in the last section, we introduce systems of identical particles. We describe how to represent the state space of such systems in terms of one-particle states, number operators and occupation number representations. Classification of identical particles into Bosons and Fermions is explained. Finally, introducing symmetric and antisymmetric states, the traditional quantization scheme using the symmetrization postulate is described. The permutation operator is introduced which is the main tool for dealing with identical particle systems in this language. We wind up by indicating how exchange degeneracy is removed which embodies the signature of indistinguishability.
The characterization of entanglement is a fundamental issue for Quantum Information Theory. But the definition of entanglement depends on the notion of locality, and thus on the tensor product structure of the state space of the composite system. This notion is affected by the presence of superselection rules that restrict the accessible Hilbert space to a direct sum of subspaces. Indistinguishability of particles imposes one such restriction, namely to totally symmetric or totally antisymmetric states. The entanglement can in this case be defined with respect to partitions of modes in the second quantization formalism. For fermionic systems the Fock space of m modes is isomorphic to the space of m qubits, but the action of creation and annihilation operators is not local, due to their anticommutation. Conservation of the parity of fermion number imposes another relevant superselection rule. It requires that local physical observables commute with the local parity operator. Taking into account the considerations above, it is possible to define the set of separable states or equivalently the concept of entanglement for fermionic systems in a number of ways. Here we analyze systematically these possibilities and the relation among the various sets of separable states. We also discuss the behavior of the different classes when taking several copies of the state, as well as the characterization of the sets in terms of the usual criteria regarding the tensor product.
Abstract According to classical physics particles are basic building blocks of the world. These classical particles are distinguishable objects, individuated by unique combinations of physical properties. By contrast, in quantum mechanics the received view is that particles of the same kind (“identical particles”) are physically indistinguishable from each other and lack identity. This doctrine rests on the quantum mechanical (anti)symmetrization postulates together with the “factorist” assumption that each single particle is represented in exactly one factor space of the tensor product Hilbert space of a many-particle system. Even though standard in theoretical physics and the philosophy of physics, the assumption of factorism and the ensuing indistinguishability of particles are problematic. Particle indistinguishability is irreconcilable with the everyday meaning of “particle”, and also with how this term is used in the practice of physics. Moreover, it is a consequence of the standard view that identical quantum particles remain indistinguishable even in the classical limit, which makes a smooth transition to the classical particle concept impossible. Lubberdink (1998; 2009) and Dieks and Lubberdink (2011) have proposed an alternative conception of quantum particles that does not rely on factorism and avoids these difficulties. We further explain and discuss this alternative framework here. One of its key consequences is that particles in quantum theory are not fundamental but emergent; another that once they have emerged, quantum particles are always physically distinguishable and thus possess a physically grounded identity.
The tensor product postulate of quantum mechanics states that the Hilbert space of a composite system is the tensor product of the components' Hilbert spaces. All current formalizations of quantum mechanics that do not contain this postulate contain some equivalent postulate or assumption (sometimes hidden). Here we give a natural definition of a composite system as a set containing the component systems and show how one can logically derive the tensor product rule from the state postulate and from the measurement postulate. In other words, our Letter reduces by one the number of postulates necessary to quantum mechanics.
Although many of the principles of quantum mechanics can be adequately illustrated by considering systems that consist of only one particle subject to external forces, there are a number of important phenomena that are manifest only in systems containing two or more particles, and these will be the subject of the present chapter. We shall begin with some general statements and go on to consider the case of two interacting particles subject to no external forces, when we shall find that, in this case, the problem can be separated into one describing the behaviour of the centre of mass of the system and another describing the relative motion. We shall then consider the case of two noninteracting particles and show that these can often be treated independently as would be expected. In the case of indistinguishable particles, however, we shall find that a symmetry is imposed on the wave function that ensures that the behaviour of such particles is coupled even when they do not interact. We shall introduce the problem of interacting systems containing more than two identical particles, explaining what is meant by “fermions” and “bosons” and how their properties compare. These results will be illustrated by discussing the energy levels and optical spectra of the helium atom, starting with the approximation that the two electrons do not interact and extending the discussion to the realistic case using perturbation theory. The chapter closes with a consideration of the effects of particle indistinguishability on scattering theory.
In this chapter we describe a technique to deal with identical particles that is called second quantization . Despite being a technique, second quantization helps a lot in understanding physics. One can learn and endlessly repeat newspaper-style statements particles are fields , fields are particles without grasping their meaning. Second quantization brings these concepts to an operational level. Since the procedure of second quantization is slightly different for fermions and bosons, we have to treat the two cases separately. We start with considering a system of identical bosons, and introduce creation and annihilation operators (CAPs) that change the number of particles in a given many-particle state, thereby connecting different states in Fock space. We show how to express occupation numbers in terms of CAPs, and then get to the heart of the second quantization: the commutation relations for the bosonic CAPs. As a next step, we construct field operators out of the CAPs and spend quite some time (and energy) presenting the physics of the particles in terms of these field operators. Only afterward, do we explain why all this activity has been called second quantization. In Section 3.4 we then present the same procedure for fermions, and we mainly focus on what is different as compared to bosons. The formalism of second quantization is summarized in Table 3.1.