Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Even and odd coherent states and tomographic representation of quantum mechanics and quantum optics VI. Man'ko

V.V. Dodonov, V.I. Man'ko

Published Mar 13, 2003• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Even/odd coherent states can be generated from a vacuum in the following way \\a±)=D(a±)\\0), (9) where even/odd displacement operators read [1,7] D(a+) = cosh( Both even and odd coherent states are normalized eigenstates of operator a2 a2\\a±)=a2\\a±), (10) where a is an arbitrary complex number. It is worth mentioning that by applying \noperator a to an even coherent state |a+), one obtains an odd coherent state with \nthe same label a, but with a different normalization constant: a\\a+) = Q\\/tanh\\a\\ 2 |a_). (11) Similarly, \na\\a-) — axjcoth\\a\\2 |a+). (12) The decomposition of the even and odd coherent states in terms of number \nstates can be obtained by using equation (3) | a + ) = T V V ^ l V s ^ 1 + ( - ! ) " Q > ) , ( 1 3 ) |a_> - 7 V _ e - l a l 2 / 2 ^ 1 ^ 1 z l ^ Q n | n ) . ( 1 4 ) The even coherent state can only be expressed in terms of even number states \nand the odd coherent state can only be expressed in terms of odd number states. \nConsequently, the probability of finding an odd number of photons in the even \ncoherent states equals zero, as does the probability of finding an even number of \nphotons in the odd coherent states. Thus the probability distribution functions for \nthese states strongly oscillate: \\a\\4k \nfor n=2k P(+)(n) = \\ coshH 2 (2 fc ) ! \n0 for n=2k+l \n0 for n=2k P ( _)(n) = ( | a | W L sinh|a:| 2(2£; + l ) ! \nfor n=2k+l Expectation values of the first-order moments for the annihilation and creation \noperators in the even and odd coherent states are equal to zero ( a ± | a | a ± ) = 0 , (15) MULTIMODE EVEN AND ODD COHERENT STATES 223 due to Eqs. (11), (12), and the orthogonality property ( a ± | a T ) = 0. The expectation values of the second-order moments are (a±\\a2\\a±) = a2, (a+\\a*a\\a+) = \\a\\2 tanh | a | 2 , (a_|a + a|a_) = \\a\\2 coth | a | 2 . (16) Defining the quadratures of the electromagnetic field mode as Xx = (a + a f ) /2 , X2 = (a-a f ) /(2i), one obtains the following expressions for their variances in the even coherent state: 4 A X 2 = 2\\a\\2 tanh \\a\\2 + 2 |a | 2 cos 20 + 1, (17) 4 A X 2 = 2 |a | 2 tanh \\a\\2 - 2\\a\\2 cos 261 + 1. (18) We have introduced the modulus and phase of the complex coherent state amplitude as a=|a|e^. Eqs. (17) and (18) show that for 9=TT/2 the first quadrature \nhas some amount of squeezing for small values of |a | , while for 0=0 the second \nquadrature is squeezed. There is a possibility of squeezing alternatively in both the \nquadratures depending upon the phase of the complex amplitude a. For odd coherent states we get the same expressions as in (17) and (18), but tanh \\ a\\2 should \nbe replaced by coth \\ a\\2. Also, odd coherent states do not exhibit the property of \nsecond-order squeezing.

DOI
10.1201/9781482288223-9

Related papers

Multi-mode, multi-photon coherent states

Jacob Katriel, A. I. Solomon

A two-mode photon operator satisfying the canonical boson commutation relations is used to define two-mode coherent states for the Weyl, SU(2) and SU(1,l) groups. In all these cases squeezing is determined by an appropriate correlation, which we evaluate. The generalisation to multi-mode, many-photon states is indicated. In this letter we introduce a formalism for describing coherent states, tailored to the multi-mode case. We shall present the two-mode case for definiteness, although the generalisation to several modes will be obvious. Similarly, we show at the end of this note how to accommodate multi-photon states with little extra effort. States associ- ated with the Weyl group (two-mode coherent states), and the groups SU.(2) and SU(1,l) will be given; and we show that (for a specific representation) the last case reduces to the two-mode sqaeezed states of Caves and Schumaker (1986). In the conventional quantum optics approach, a mode of the electromagnetic field is represented by a creation (annihilation) operator a(at), with commutation relation (a, a') = 1. Our starting point in considering the two-mode case is to introduce a two-mode operator A analogous to the single-mode operator a. We do this by defining (Katriel and Hummer 1981) A = (max(Al, A2) + 1)'2ala2 , (1) Here al, a2 are the (annihilation) operators referring to each mode; they obey the basic commutation relation (ai, ait) = 6, but commute with each other. The number operators AI, A2 are defined in the usual way, Ai = aitai and functions of Ai will be evaluated in simultaneous eigenstates of rii, where of course they equal the functions of the corresponding eigenvalues. Now, we may show easily that (A, A') = 1. We note that AA = AtA = min(A1, h2). (The generalisation of (1) to three (or more) modes, which we shall not pursue, is immediate on replacing one of the two single-mode operators by a two-mode one.) Note that all the states defined here give variance-free single-mode operators; since At always creates equal numbers of 1 and 2 modes

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Dec 1, 1989•3 citations

Coherent states

J. C. Garrison, R. Y. Chiao

The elementary quantum theory of quasi-classical states for mechanical harmonic oscillators is applied to the radiation oscillators describing light, and thus used to define quasi-classical states of light. These states are called “coherent”, because the expectation value of any normally ordered product of creation and annihilation operators factorizes for them. A theoretical discussion of possible sources for coherent states is followed by experimental evidence for their existence. The mathematical properties of coherent states, e.g., nonorthogonality and overcompleteness, are explained in order to use them to represent states and operators. These representations provide a suitable replacement for the classical phase space description of light, which is forbidden by the uncertainty principle. The quantum phase space approach leads to the definition of the Wigner distribution, the Q-function, the P-function, and Gaussian mixed states.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jun 5, 2008•0 citations

Non-classical Properties of Even and Odd Coherent States

Christopher C. Gerry

We present a detailed discussion of even and odd coherent states defined as eigenstates of the single mode two-photon annihilation operator a 2. We study the non-classical properties such as squeezing, higher-order squeezing, and photon antibunching. Also discussed are the various quantum quasiprobability distributions, namely the P function, which is shown to be highly singular, the Q function, and the Wigner, which can take on negative values for these states. Finally, we present a discussion of a possible mechanism for the generation of such states based on the competition between parametric amplification and the incoherent losses from two-photon resonant absorption.

Journal of Modern Optics•Jun 1, 1993•130 citations

Photon-added squeezed vacuum (one-photon) state as an even (odd) nonlinear coherent state

Nai-Le Liu, Zhihu Sun, Hong-Yi Fan

We show that the photon-added squeezed vacuum a m S ( z )|0 and the photon-added squeezed one-photon state a m S ( z )|1 , where m is a non-negative integer, may be regarded as even and odd nonlinear coherent states, respectively. To achieve this, we derive an operator-valued function f ( N , m ) of the number operator N = a a such that a m S ( z )| i ( i = 0,1) are eigenstates of f ( N , m ) a 2 . Based on this, and using the unified method developed by Shanta et al , we find that a m S ( z )| i can be equivalently expressed in exponential forms. The eigenstates of f ( N ,- m ) a 2 are also constructed and their nonclassical features are studied in detail.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Feb 28, 2000•10 citations

Second-order squeezed states

Paulina Marian

We examine the generalized squeezed states defined as eigenstates of a linear combination of the lowering and raising operators ${\mathrm{a}}^{2}$ and (${\mathrm{a}}^{\mathrm{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}}$${)}^{2}$, respectively. This approach is entirely equivalent to the minimum-uncertainty method applied to the amplitude-squared operators. We solve the eigenvalue equation in Glauber's coherent-state representation and find two independent solutions. Their Fock-state expansions, one containing only even and the other only odd number states, reveal a strong nonclassical character. We show that the calculation of the mean photon number is sufficient to obtain the expectation values of interest. Consequently, photon statistics is investigated in both cases by using the generating function of the photon-number distribution. We find the conditions under which the second-order squeezed states display photon antibunching and quadrature squeezing. Also discussed is the preservation of their amplitude-squared squeezing by linear amplification at gains exceeding 2. Analytically, our results are simple formulas in terms of Kummer and Gauss hypergeometric functions that allow straightforward numerical calculations.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1997•14 citations

The internal structure of the eigenstates of the higher order of the annihilation operators for any optical field

Liang Mai

The eigenstates of the higher order of the annihilation operator for any optical field all have even and odd structure just like the even and odd coherent states. According to this result, it is pointed out how to use the eigenstates of a M to generate the eigenstates a 2M for the monomode optical fields.

Chinese journal of atomic and molecular physics•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations
Even/odd coherent states can be generated from a vacuum in the following way \a±)=D(a±)\0), (9) where even/odd displacement operators read [1,7] D(a+) = cosh( Both even and odd coherent states are normalized eigenstates of operator a2 a2\a±)=a2\a±), (10) where a is an arbitrary complex number. It is worth mentioning that by applying \noperator a to an even coherent state |a+), one obtains an odd coherent state with \nthe same label a, but with a different normalization constant: a\a+) = Q\/tanh\a\ 2 |a_). (11) Similarly, \na\a-) — axjcoth\a\2 |a+). (12) The decomposition of the even and odd coherent states in terms of number \nstates can be obtained by using equation (3) | a + ) = T V V ^ l V s ^ 1 + ( - ! ) " Q > ) , ( 1 3 ) |a_> - 7 V _ e - l a l 2 / 2 ^ 1 ^ 1 z l ^ Q n | n ) . ( 1 4 ) The even coherent state can only be expressed in terms of even number states \nand the odd coherent state can only be expressed in terms of odd number states. \nConsequently, the probability of finding an odd number of photons in the even \ncoherent states equals zero, as does the probability of finding an even number of \nphotons in the odd coherent states. Thus the probability distribution functions for \nthese states strongly oscillate: \a\4k \nfor n=2k P(+)(n) = \ coshH 2 (2 fc ) ! \n0 for n=2k+l \n0 for n=2k P ( )(n) = ( | a | W L sinh|a:| 2(2£; + l ) ! \nfor n=2k+l Expectation values of the first-order moments for the annihilation and creation \noperators in the even and odd coherent states are equal to zero ( a ± | a | a ± ) = 0 , (15) MULTIMODE EVEN AND ODD COHERENT STATES 223 due to Eqs. (11), (12), and the orthogonality property ( a ± | a T ) = 0. The expectation values of the second-order moments are (a±\a2\a±) = a2, (a+\a*a\a+) = \a\2 tanh | a | 2 , (a|a + a|a_) = \a\2 coth | a | 2 . (16) Defining the quadratures of the electromagnetic field mode as Xx = (a + a f ) /2 , X2 = (a-a f ) /(2i), one obtains the following expressions for their variances in the even coherent state: 4 A X 2 = 2\a\2 tanh \a\2 + 2 |a | 2 cos 20 + 1, (17) 4 A X 2 = 2 |a | 2 tanh \a\2 - 2\a\2 cos 261 + 1. (18) We have introduced the modulus and phase of the complex coherent state amplitude as a=|a|e^. Eqs. (17) and (18) show that for 9=TT/2 the first quadrature \nhas some amount of squeezing for small values of |a | , while for 0=0 the second \nquadrature is squeezed. There is a possibility of squeezing alternatively in both the \nquadratures depending upon the phase of the complex amplitude a. For odd coherent states we get the same expressions as in (17) and (18), but tanh \ a\2 should \nbe replaced by coth \ a\2. Also, odd coherent states do not exhibit the property of \nsecond-order squeezing.
A two-mode photon operator satisfying the canonical boson commutation relations is used to define two-mode coherent states for the Weyl, SU(2) and SU(1,l) groups. In all these cases squeezing is determined by an appropriate correlation, which we evaluate. The generalisation to multi-mode, many-photon states is indicated. In this letter we introduce a formalism for describing coherent states, tailored to the multi-mode case. We shall present the two-mode case for definiteness, although the generalisation to several modes will be obvious. Similarly, we show at the end of this note how to accommodate multi-photon states with little extra effort. States associ- ated with the Weyl group (two-mode coherent states), and the groups SU.(2) and SU(1,l) will be given; and we show that (for a specific representation) the last case reduces to the two-mode sqaeezed states of Caves and Schumaker (1986). In the conventional quantum optics approach, a mode of the electromagnetic field is represented by a creation (annihilation) operator a(at), with commutation relation (a, a') = 1. Our starting point in considering the two-mode case is to introduce a two-mode operator A analogous to the single-mode operator a. We do this by defining (Katriel and Hummer 1981) A = (max(Al, A2) + 1)'2ala2 , (1) Here al, a2 are the (annihilation) operators referring to each mode; they obey the basic commutation relation (ai, ait) = 6, but commute with each other. The number operators AI, A2 are defined in the usual way, Ai = aitai and functions of Ai will be evaluated in simultaneous eigenstates of rii, where of course they equal the functions of the corresponding eigenvalues. Now, we may show easily that (A, A') = 1. We note that AA = AtA = min(A1, h2). (The generalisation of (1) to three (or more) modes, which we shall not pursue, is immediate on replacing one of the two single-mode operators by a two-mode one.) Note that all the states defined here give variance-free single-mode operators; since At always creates equal numbers of 1 and 2 modes
The elementary quantum theory of quasi-classical states for mechanical harmonic oscillators is applied to the radiation oscillators describing light, and thus used to define quasi-classical states of light. These states are called “coherent”, because the expectation value of any normally ordered product of creation and annihilation operators factorizes for them. A theoretical discussion of possible sources for coherent states is followed by experimental evidence for their existence. The mathematical properties of coherent states, e.g., nonorthogonality and overcompleteness, are explained in order to use them to represent states and operators. These representations provide a suitable replacement for the classical phase space description of light, which is forbidden by the uncertainty principle. The quantum phase space approach leads to the definition of the Wigner distribution, the Q-function, the P-function, and Gaussian mixed states.
We present a detailed discussion of even and odd coherent states defined as eigenstates of the single mode two-photon annihilation operator a 2. We study the non-classical properties such as squeezing, higher-order squeezing, and photon antibunching. Also discussed are the various quantum quasiprobability distributions, namely the P function, which is shown to be highly singular, the Q function, and the Wigner, which can take on negative values for these states. Finally, we present a discussion of a possible mechanism for the generation of such states based on the competition between parametric amplification and the incoherent losses from two-photon resonant absorption.
We show that the photon-added squeezed vacuum a m S ( z )|0 and the photon-added squeezed one-photon state a m S ( z )|1 , where m is a non-negative integer, may be regarded as even and odd nonlinear coherent states, respectively. To achieve this, we derive an operator-valued function f ( N , m ) of the number operator N = a a such that a m S ( z )| i ( i = 0,1) are eigenstates of f ( N , m ) a 2 . Based on this, and using the unified method developed by Shanta et al , we find that a m S ( z )| i can be equivalently expressed in exponential forms. The eigenstates of f ( N ,- m ) a 2 are also constructed and their nonclassical features are studied in detail.
We examine the generalized squeezed states defined as eigenstates of a linear combination of the lowering and raising operators a2{\mathrm{a}}^{2}a2 and (${\mathrm{a}}^{\mathrm{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}}$)2{)}^{2})2, respectively. This approach is entirely equivalent to the minimum-uncertainty method applied to the amplitude-squared operators. We solve the eigenvalue equation in Glauber's coherent-state representation and find two independent solutions. Their Fock-state expansions, one containing only even and the other only odd number states, reveal a strong nonclassical character. We show that the calculation of the mean photon number is sufficient to obtain the expectation values of interest. Consequently, photon statistics is investigated in both cases by using the generating function of the photon-number distribution. We find the conditions under which the second-order squeezed states display photon antibunching and quadrature squeezing. Also discussed is the preservation of their amplitude-squared squeezing by linear amplification at gains exceeding 2. Analytically, our results are simple formulas in terms of Kummer and Gauss hypergeometric functions that allow straightforward numerical calculations.