Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Further consequences of Einstein locality

Luigi Schiavulli, F. Selleri

Published Jun 1, 1979• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00708526

Related papers

On the consequences of Einstein locality

F. Selleri

Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 1978•28 citations

Einstein Locality and the Quantum Mechanical Long-Distance Effects

F. Selleri

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1980•4 citations

A realistic view of the canonical Einstein$ndash$Podolsky$ndash$Rosen$ndash$Bohm experiment based on quantum theory and its consequences

Boon Leong Lan

A realistic view of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiment with spins based on quantum theory is presented. This view implies that there is no action at a distance. It also implies that the measurement result A ( B ) for particle 1 (2) depends on both magnet angles, and hence the probability of obtaining the result A ( B ) also depends on both magnet angles. In the light of these realistic implications, it is clear that what is wrong at least with local realistic theory is not the locality or no-action-at-a-distance assumption itself but rather the formal implementation of that assumption.

arXiv:quant-ph/0202151•Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Aug 1, 2002•5 citations

Einstein Rebooted, Bell's Theorem Refuted, Etc.

Gordon Watson

Rebooting Einstein's ideas about local-causality, an engineer brings local-causality to quantum theory via operators and variables in 3-space. Taking realism to be the view that external reality exists and has definite properties, his core principle is common-sense local realism (CLR): the union of local-causality (no causal influence propagates superluminally) and physical-realism (some physical properties change interactively). Endorsing Einstein-separability — system X is independent of what is done with system Y that is spatially separated from X — Bell's famous mission is advanced. That is, by means of parameters λ, a more complete specification of EPRB's physics is successful. A consequent locally-causal refutation of Bell's theorem allows EPRB correlations to be explained in a classical way, in line with Einstein's ideas, without reference to Hilbert space, quantum states, etc. Conclusion: Bell's theorem is based on a mathematical error; an error in reduction is inconsistent with Bell's opening assumptions.

•Sep 1, 2016•0 citations

Einstein Locality

Henry Pierce Stapp

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•2 citations

A minimal local extension of the quantum formalism

Thomas D. Angelidis

We propose a consistent local theory Th(g) extending the quantum formalism. As a consequence, a realistic and local (“common cause”) interpretation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm ideal experiment can now be given. The extended local theory Th(g) satisfies the Bell inequality τ. We call for an experiment to test the validity of τ∈Th(g) and submit it as a crucial test against the apparently false conjecture of nonlocality.

Mysteries, Puzzles, and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics•Jan 1, 1999•1 citation
A realistic view of the canonical EinsteinndashndashndashPodolskyndashndashndashRosenndashndashndashBohm experiment based on quantum theory and its consequences
A realistic view of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiment with spins based on quantum theory is presented. This view implies that there is no action at a distance. It also implies that the measurement result A ( B ) for particle 1 (2) depends on both magnet angles, and hence the probability of obtaining the result A ( B ) also depends on both magnet angles. In the light of these realistic implications, it is clear that what is wrong at least with local realistic theory is not the locality or no-action-at-a-distance assumption itself but rather the formal implementation of that assumption.
Rebooting Einstein's ideas about local-causality, an engineer brings local-causality to quantum theory via operators and variables in 3-space. Taking realism to be the view that external reality exists and has definite properties, his core principle is common-sense local realism (CLR): the union of local-causality (no causal influence propagates superluminally) and physical-realism (some physical properties change interactively). Endorsing Einstein-separability — system X is independent of what is done with system Y that is spatially separated from X — Bell's famous mission is advanced. That is, by means of parameters λ, a more complete specification of EPRB's physics is successful. A consequent locally-causal refutation of Bell's theorem allows EPRB correlations to be explained in a classical way, in line with Einstein's ideas, without reference to Hilbert space, quantum states, etc. Conclusion: Bell's theorem is based on a mathematical error; an error in reduction is inconsistent with Bell's opening assumptions.