Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks

Quantum Retrodiction

John Jeffers, Stephen Mark Barnett, David Thomas Pegg, Ottavia Jedrkiewicz, R. Loudon

Published Feb 24, 2006• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

In this paper we have described the retrodictive quantum formalism. We have defined the operator which describes preparation devices, and the retrodictive state, which is simply the normalised measurement POM element. These enable simple evaluation of preparation probabilities given the results of some later measurement event. We have shown how to apply the formalism to both closed and open quantum systems.

DOI
10.1007/0-306-47114-0_22

Related papers

Atomic retrodiction

Stephen Mark Barnett, David Thomas Pegg, John Jeffers +1 more

Measurement of a quantum system provides information concerning the state in which it was prepared. In this paper we show how the retrodictive formalism can be used to evaluate the probability associated with any one of a given set of preparation events. We illustrate our method by calculating the retrodictive density operator for a two-level atom coupled to the electromagnetic field.

arXiv:quant-ph/0107019•Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics•Aug 2, 2000•21 citations

Quantum retrodiction in open systems

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett, John Jeffers

Quantum retrodiction involves finding the probabilities for various preparation events given a measurement event. This theory has been studied for some time but mainly as an interesting concept associated with time asymmetry in quantum mechanics. Recent interest in quantum communications and cryptography, however, has provided retrodiction with a potential practical application. For this purpose quantum retrodiction in open systems should be more relevant than in closed systems isolated from the environment. In this paper we study retrodiction in open systems and develop a general master equation for the backward time evolution of the measured state, which can be used for calculating preparation probabilities. We solve the master equation, by way of example, for the driven two-level atom coupled to the electromagnetic field.

arXiv:quant-ph/0208082•Physical Review A•Aug 12, 2002•45 citations

Retrodictive State Generation and Quantum Measurement

David Thomas Pegg

Retrodictive quantum states are states that propagate backwards in time from a measurement event. Although retrodictive quantum mechanics appears to be very different from the usual predictive formalism, in that propagation of states into the past appears to violate causality, this is not so. Indeed causality is not manifest in the time direction of propagation of quantum states at all. Instead, causality is ensured by the different normalization conditions applied to the preparation and measurement device operators. It is this difference that introduces the arrow of time into quantum mechanics. Retrodictive states are useful for applications such as measurement, predictive quantum state engineering and quantum communication. Here we show how any optical retrodictive state that can be expressed to a good approximation in a finite‐dimensional Hilbert space can be generated from predictive coherent states, a lossless multiport device and photodetectors. The composition of the retrodictive state can be controlled by adjusting the input predictive coherent states. This allows, for example, projection synthesis for an optical state to be achieved with the exotic reciprocal binomial reference state replaced by a simple coherent state.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

Retrodiction as a tool for micromaser field measurements

John Jeffers, S. M. Barnett, David Thomas Pegg

We use retrodictive quantum theory to describe cavity field measurements by successive atomic detections in the micromaser. We calculate the state of the micromaser cavity field prior to detection of sequences of atoms in either the excited or ground state, for atoms that are initially prepared in the excited state. This provides the POM elements, which describe such sequences of measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/0207086•Journal of Modern Optics•Apr 1, 2002•5 citations

Bayes' theorem and quantum retrodiction

Stephen Mark Barnett, David Thomas Pegg, John Jeffers

We derive on the basis of Bayes' theorem a simple but general expression for the retrodicted premeasurement state associated with the result of any measurement. The retrodictive density operator is the normalized probability operator measure element associated with the result. We examine applications to quantum optical cryptography and to the optical beam splitter.

arXiv:quant-ph/0106139•Journal of Modern Optics•Sep 1, 2000•74 citations

Retrodiction in quantum optics

David Thomas Pegg, Stephen Mark Barnett

The usual formalism of quantum mechanics is predictive with state vectors being assigned on the basis of past preparation procedures. The retrodictive formalism, in which some state vectors are assigned on the basis of future measurement results is less usual, although it has been known for some time. Although at first sight this formalism may appear to be anticausal and subject to paradoxes, if used carefully it still predicts the same measurable correlations as the more usual approach despite different assignments of state vectors to states in the interval between preparation and measurement of the system. Here we use a procedure which involves retrodiction to examine some quantum optical processes, including a recent state truncation process. The collapse of the state vector occurs at a different time from that for the usual approach underlining the difficulty in regarding the collapse as a real physical process.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Aug 1, 1999•39 citations
In this paper we have described the retrodictive quantum formalism. We have defined the operator which describes preparation devices, and the retrodictive state, which is simply the normalised measurement POM element. These enable simple evaluation of preparation probabilities given the results of some later measurement event. We have shown how to apply the formalism to both closed and open quantum systems.
Quantum retrodiction involves finding the probabilities for various preparation events given a measurement event. This theory has been studied for some time but mainly as an interesting concept associated with time asymmetry in quantum mechanics. Recent interest in quantum communications and cryptography, however, has provided retrodiction with a potential practical application. For this purpose quantum retrodiction in open systems should be more relevant than in closed systems isolated from the environment. In this paper we study retrodiction in open systems and develop a general master equation for the backward time evolution of the measured state, which can be used for calculating preparation probabilities. We solve the master equation, by way of example, for the driven two-level atom coupled to the electromagnetic field.
Retrodictive quantum states are states that propagate backwards in time from a measurement event. Although retrodictive quantum mechanics appears to be very different from the usual predictive formalism, in that propagation of states into the past appears to violate causality, this is not so. Indeed causality is not manifest in the time direction of propagation of quantum states at all. Instead, causality is ensured by the different normalization conditions applied to the preparation and measurement device operators. It is this difference that introduces the arrow of time into quantum mechanics. Retrodictive states are useful for applications such as measurement, predictive quantum state engineering and quantum communication. Here we show how any optical retrodictive state that can be expressed to a good approximation in a finite‐dimensional Hilbert space can be generated from predictive coherent states, a lossless multiport device and photodetectors. The composition of the retrodictive state can be controlled by adjusting the input predictive coherent states. This allows, for example, projection synthesis for an optical state to be achieved with the exotic reciprocal binomial reference state replaced by a simple coherent state.
The usual formalism of quantum mechanics is predictive with state vectors being assigned on the basis of past preparation procedures. The retrodictive formalism, in which some state vectors are assigned on the basis of future measurement results is less usual, although it has been known for some time. Although at first sight this formalism may appear to be anticausal and subject to paradoxes, if used carefully it still predicts the same measurable correlations as the more usual approach despite different assignments of state vectors to states in the interval between preparation and measurement of the system. Here we use a procedure which involves retrodiction to examine some quantum optical processes, including a recent state truncation process. The collapse of the state vector occurs at a different time from that for the usual approach underlining the difficulty in regarding the collapse as a real physical process.