Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Princeton University Press eBooks

The Decoherence Effect

Published Dec 8, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv173f2pm.21

Related papers

Introducing Decoherence

The frontiers collection•Jul 27, 2007•0 citations

Completely positive non-Markovian decoherence

Jinhyoung Lee, Inbo Kim, Doyeol Ahn +2 more

We propose an effective Hamiltonian approach to investigate decoherence of a quantum system in a non-Markovian reservoir, naturally imposing the complete positivity on the reduced dynamics of the system. The formalism is based on the notion of an effective reservoir, i.e., certain collective degrees of freedom in the reservoir that are responsible for the decoherence. As examples for completely positive decoherence, we present three typical decoherence processes for a qubit such as dephasing, depolarizing, and amplitude damping. The effects of the non-Markovian decoherence are compared to the Markovian decoherence.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403018•Physical Review A•Aug 4, 2004•32 citations

Decoherence

Princeton University Press eBooks•Apr 7, 2026•0 citations

The concepts of stationary and dynamical decoherence and their time scales

János Polonyi

To study the phenomenon of decoherence the effective Lagrangian of a test particle interacting with an ideal gas is derived in the leading order of the perturbation expansion and in order $\ord{\partial^2_t}$. Two concepts of decoherence are distinguished and investigated in details: The general dynamical decoherence and the stationary decoherence, an approximation of the dynamical phenomenon corresponding to the assumption of a static test particle trajectory. Comparison of the stationary decoherence described by the present effective theory with the traditional description of decoherence based on collision theory reveals a qualitative similarity within their domain of applicability. However, the effective theory predicts comparable time scales for decoherence and dissipation in contrast to the deviation of this scales by many orders of magnitudes, estimated by referring to the collision approach. In particular the extremely fast decoherence predicted by the collisional approach can only be reproduced by the effective theory for parameter values which violate the applicability of both approaches. On the other hand, in harmonic systems, the true dynamical decoherence is indeed an extremely fast process involving a double exponential time dependence. It is argued that, in realistic systems, the dissipative effective dynamics is non-perturbative in nature and its asymptotic, relaxed state incorporates strong quantum fluctuations.

•May 3, 2016•0 citations

Decoherence

Jochen Pade

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Nov 7, 2013•0 citations

Microscopic and macroscopic effects in the decoherence of neutrino oscillations

Ting Cheng, M. Lindner, Werner Rodejohann B

Abstract We present a generic structure (the layer structure) for decoherence effects in neutrino oscillations, which includes decoherence from quantum mechanical and classical uncertainties. The calculation is done by combining the concept of open quantum system and quantum field theory, forming a structure composed of phase spaces from microscopic to macroscopic level. Having information loss at different levels, quantum mechanical uncertainties parameterize decoherence by an intrinsic mass eigenstate separation effect, while decoherence for classical uncertainties is typically dominated by a statistical averaging effect. With the help of the layer structure, we classify the former as state decoherence (SD) and the latter as phase decoherence (PD), then further conclude that both SD and PD result from phase wash-out effects of different phase structures on different layers. Such effects admit for simple numerical calculations of decoherence for a given width and shape of uncertainties. While our structure is generic, so are the uncertainties, nonetheless, a few notable ones are: the wavepacket size of the external particles, the effective interaction volume at production and detection, the energy reconstruction model and the neutrino production profile. Furthermore, we estimate the experimental sensitivities for SD and PD parameterized by the uncertainty parameters, for reactor neutrinos and decay-at-rest neutrinos, using a traditional rate measuring method and a novel phase measuring method.

arXiv:2204.10696•Journal of High Energy Physics•Aug 9, 2022•11 citations
We propose an effective Hamiltonian approach to investigate decoherence of a quantum system in a non-Markovian reservoir, naturally imposing the complete positivity on the reduced dynamics of the system. The formalism is based on the notion of an effective reservoir, i.e., certain collective degrees of freedom in the reservoir that are responsible for the decoherence. As examples for completely positive decoherence, we present three typical decoherence processes for a qubit such as dephasing, depolarizing, and amplitude damping. The effects of the non-Markovian decoherence are compared to the Markovian decoherence.
To study the phenomenon of decoherence the effective Lagrangian of a test particle interacting with an ideal gas is derived in the leading order of the perturbation expansion and in order $\ord{\partial^2_t}$. Two concepts of decoherence are distinguished and investigated in details: The general dynamical decoherence and the stationary decoherence, an approximation of the dynamical phenomenon corresponding to the assumption of a static test particle trajectory. Comparison of the stationary decoherence described by the present effective theory with the traditional description of decoherence based on collision theory reveals a qualitative similarity within their domain of applicability. However, the effective theory predicts comparable time scales for decoherence and dissipation in contrast to the deviation of this scales by many orders of magnitudes, estimated by referring to the collision approach. In particular the extremely fast decoherence predicted by the collisional approach can only be reproduced by the effective theory for parameter values which violate the applicability of both approaches. On the other hand, in harmonic systems, the true dynamical decoherence is indeed an extremely fast process involving a double exponential time dependence. It is argued that, in realistic systems, the dissipative effective dynamics is non-perturbative in nature and its asymptotic, relaxed state incorporates strong quantum fluctuations.
Abstract We present a generic structure (the layer structure) for decoherence effects in neutrino oscillations, which includes decoherence from quantum mechanical and classical uncertainties. The calculation is done by combining the concept of open quantum system and quantum field theory, forming a structure composed of phase spaces from microscopic to macroscopic level. Having information loss at different levels, quantum mechanical uncertainties parameterize decoherence by an intrinsic mass eigenstate separation effect, while decoherence for classical uncertainties is typically dominated by a statistical averaging effect. With the help of the layer structure, we classify the former as state decoherence (SD) and the latter as phase decoherence (PD), then further conclude that both SD and PD result from phase wash-out effects of different phase structures on different layers. Such effects admit for simple numerical calculations of decoherence for a given width and shape of uncertainties. While our structure is generic, so are the uncertainties, nonetheless, a few notable ones are: the wavepacket size of the external particles, the effective interaction volume at production and detection, the energy reconstruction model and the neutrino production profile. Furthermore, we estimate the experimental sensitivities for SD and PD parameterized by the uncertainty parameters, for reactor neutrinos and decay-at-rest neutrinos, using a traditional rate measuring method and a novel phase measuring method.