Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics

Quantum mechanics of rectilinear orbits of the Coulomb-Kepler problem (II.)

Alexander Rauh

Published Jan 1, 2018• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

As compared to the wave function adopted previously (Adv. Stud. \nin Theor. Phys. Vol.11, 2017, p.365), the new ansatz for fulills now \nenergy conservation rigorously with respect to a curve parameter w greater/equal 0. \nThe symmetry of implies that the mean position and mean velocity \nare parallel or anti-parallel, always. The model describes the scattering \nof a wave packet by the Coulomb potential over a finite time range, \nwhere in the mean only forward and back scattering is possible. The \ndecisive point is to elaborate the definition interval of w as a time equivalent \ncurve parameter. The mean initial position and velocity are built \ninto and form a two-dimensional parameter space P. As it turns out, \nwithin a subspace A _ P, curve parameter w and time t are in 1-1 correspondence \nfor all t greater/equal 0; moreover, one observes mean forward scattering \nwhen the mean initial velocity is directed towards the force center: the \nmean trajectory "tunnels" through the Coulomb singularity. On the \nother hand, in the parameter space complementary to A, the definition \ndomain of the curve parameter is limited and ends before the singularity \nis reached, which means that forward or backscattering cannot \nbe predicted by the given model where the time dependent Schrödinger \nequation is not generally solved.

DOI
10.12988/astp.2018.838

Related papers

Quantum mechanics of rectilinear orbits of the Coulomb-Kepler problem

Alexander Rauh

Based on coherent states of the reversed harmonic oscillator, a wave function is proposed with the following three properties: (1) The mean values of position, r0, and velocity, v0, are parallel to the x axis; (2) The wave function is extended by a curve parameter w ≥ 0 such that, as a function of w, the mean values rw and vw describe a rectilinear orbit along the x axis with the mean initial values r0 and v0; (3) The mean energy is constant with respect to w by the leading order of the perturbation parameter ∈. For comparison, the classical one-dimensional equation of motion is integrated. Exact analytical equivalence between classical and the ∈ = 0 quantum limit is found, both for positive and negative mean energy. The curve parameter w is in 1-1 correspondence with time t ≥ 0.

Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 2017•2 citations

ELEMENTARY SOLUTIONS OF THE QUANTUM PROBLEM OF THE MOTION OF A PARTICLE IN THE FIELD OF TWO COULOMB CENTERS.

Yu. N. Demkov

•Jan 1, 1968•3 citations

Singular interactions in quantum mechanics: solvable models

Gianfausto Dell’Antonio, Pavel Exner, Vladimir A. Geyler

This issue comprises two dozen research papers which are all in one sense or another devoted to models in which the interaction is singular and sharply localized; a typical example is a quantum particle interacting with a family of δ-type potentials. Such an idealization usually makes analysis of their properties considerably easier, sometimes allowing us to reduce it to a simple algebraic problem—this is why one speaks about solvable models. The subject can be traced back to the early days of quantum mechanics; however, the progress in this field was slow and uneven until the 1960s, mostly because singular interactions are often difficult to deal with mathematically and intuitive arguments do not work. After overcoming the initial difficulties the `classical' theory of point interactions was developed, and finally summarized in 1988 in a monograph by Albeverio, Gesztesy, Høegh-Krohn, and Holden, which you will find quoted in numerous places within this issue. A reliable way to judge theories is to observe the progress they make within one or two decades. In this case there is no doubt that the field has witnessed a continuous development and covered areas which nobody had thought of when the subject first emerged. The reader may see it in the second edition of the aforementioned book which was published by AMS Chelsea only recently and contained a brief survey of these new achievements. It is no coincidence that this topical issue appears at the same time; it has been conceived as its counterpart and a forum at which fresh results in the field can demonstrated. Let us briefly survey the contents of the issue. While the papers included have in common the basic subject, they represent a broad spectrum philosophically as well as technically, and any attempt to classify them is somewhat futile. Nevertheless, we will divide them into a few groups. The first comprises contributions directly related to the usual point-interaction ideology. M Correggi and one of the editors study a toy model of a decay under the influence of a time-periodic δ potential. E Demiralp describes the spectrum of a spherical harmonic oscillator amended with a concentric family of δ-shell interactions. Another of the editors presents an isoperimetric problem for point interactions arranged at vertices of a polygon. W Huddell and R Hughes show how singular perturbations of a one-dimensional Dirac operator can be approximated by regular potentials, and J Brasche constructs a family of Hamiltonians in which the singular interaction has a more complicated support, namely a Brownian path. Finally, B Pavlov and I Antoniou apply the singular perturbation technique to another classical Hamiltonian, that of a generalized Friedrichs model; no matter that the unperturbed observable is called momentum in their paper. The three papers in the following group are distinguished by the fact that they consider systems which are fully or partially periodic. F Bentosela and M Tater analyse scattering on a crystalline `slab' modelled by point interactions distributed periodically on a finite number of parallel plates. E de Prunelé studies evolution of wavepackets in crystal models of different geometries, and M Avdonin et al discuss a simple model of a spin-dependent scattering on a one-dimensional array of quantum dots. The next group of papers is devoted to a topic which was untouched at the time of the aforementioned first edition, namely quantum graphs, which became a subject of interest after numerous applications of such systems to semiconductor, carbon and other nanostructures. Most contributions here deal with the `usual' model in which the Hamiltonian is a Schrödinger operator supported by the graph. P Kuchment describes spectral properties of such graphs, in particular periodic ones and those with decorations. S Albeverio and K Pankrashkin present a modification of Krein's formula which is suitable for constructing Hamiltonians of quantum graphs using boundary conditions at vertices directly. Two papers are devoted to inverse problems in this context: M Harmer studies inverse scattering for the matrix Schrödinger operator on the halfline with applications to star graphs, while P Kurasov and M Nowaczyk give a mathematically rigorous version of the known Gutkin–Smilansky result on the inverse spectral problem. The paper by O Post contributes to the question of how graphs can be approximated by more realistic `fat' graphs, and describes a class leading to disconnected quantum graphs. Finally, S Kondej and one of the editors study scattering in the context of `leaky' graphs which takes quantum tunnelling into account. While most results in this field describe one-particle Hamiltonians, more complicated systems have also been studied. In this issue we have three examples. C Cacciapuito, R Carlone, and R Figari discuss decoherence in a simple model of two particles, one heavy and one light, interacting through a δ potential; they give a rigorous meaning to a formula derived by Joos and Zeh. A related model by R Figari and A Teta is used to describe ionization. M Hallnäs, E Langmann, and C Paufler treat a true N -body situation, namely a model of one-dimensional gas of distinguishable particles interacting through generalized point interactions; they write the Bethe ansatz and present the solution of a particular case. The last group is a collection of contributions which in one sense or another are outside quantum mechanics, either modifying its postulates or applying it to a different physical situation. The latter applies to the paper of D Noja and A Posilicano in which they study nonlinear wave equations with point perturbations and show the existence of a solution to the Cauchy problem. F Coutinho et al discuss one-dimensional point interactions with energy-dependent coupling constant, S Albeverio and S Kuzhel examine a class of point interactions which are not symmetric but P-symmetric, where P is the parity operator, and M Znojil and V Jakubský consider a `double-well' PT-symmetric model with two δ interactions with an imaginary coupling. The last two papers present mathematical constructions. Yu Shondin demonstrates a way to define an interaction more singular than the usual δ potentials obtained by means of self-adjoint extensions, and V Koshmanenko presents a construction of strongly singular perturbations leading to rather unusual `Hamiltonians'.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•May 18, 2005•6 citations

Elliptical orbits in quantum mechanics

Dale R. Snider

Solutions are found to Schrödinger’s equation with an inverse-r potential which well approximate the classical solution, an elliptical orbit.

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1983•11 citations

Quantum mechanics of hyperbolic orbits in the Kepler problem

Alexander Rauh, J Iirgen Parisi

The problem of deriving macroscopic properties from the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom is resumed by extending previous results in the literature, which predicted elliptic orbits, into the region of hyperbolic orbits. As a main tool, coherent states of the harmonic oscillator are used which are continued to imaginary frequencies. The Kustaanheimo-Stiefel (KS) map is applied to transform the original configuration space into the product space of four harmonic oscillators with a constraint. The relation derived between real time and oscillator (pseudo) time includes quantum corrections. In the limit $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$, the time-dependent mean values of position and velocity describe the classical motion on a hyperbola and a circular hodograph, respectively. Moreover, the connection between pseudotime and real time comes out in analogy to Kepler's equation for elliptic orbits. The mean-square-root deviations of position and velocity components behave similarly in time to the corresponding ones of a spreading Gaussian wave packet in free space. To check the approximate treatment of the constraint, its contribution to the mean energy is determined with the result that it is negligible except for energy values close to the parabolic orbit with eccentricity equal to 1. It is inevitable to introduce a suitable scalar product in ${\mathbb{R}}^{4}$ which makes both the transformed Hamiltonian and the velocity operators Hermitian. An elementary necessary criterion is given for the energy interval where the constraint can be approximated by averaging.

Physical Review A•Apr 12, 2011•8 citations

The Schrödinger Equation in Three–Dimensions

Şaki̇r Erkoç

Consider an isolated two–body system (see Figure 7.1 ). The Hamiltonian representing the system is

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 28, 2006•0 citations
As compared to the wave function adopted previously (Adv. Stud. \nin Theor. Phys. Vol.11, 2017, p.365), the new ansatz for fulills now \nenergy conservation rigorously with respect to a curve parameter w greater/equal 0. \nThe symmetry of implies that the mean position and mean velocity \nare parallel or anti-parallel, always. The model describes the scattering \nof a wave packet by the Coulomb potential over a finite time range, \nwhere in the mean only forward and back scattering is possible. The \ndecisive point is to elaborate the definition interval of w as a time equivalent \ncurve parameter. The mean initial position and velocity are built \ninto and form a two-dimensional parameter space P. As it turns out, \nwithin a subspace A _ P, curve parameter w and time t are in 1-1 correspondence \nfor all t greater/equal 0; moreover, one observes mean forward scattering \nwhen the mean initial velocity is directed towards the force center: the \nmean trajectory "tunnels" through the Coulomb singularity. On the \nother hand, in the parameter space complementary to A, the definition \ndomain of the curve parameter is limited and ends before the singularity \nis reached, which means that forward or backscattering cannot \nbe predicted by the given model where the time dependent Schrödinger \nequation is not generally solved.
Based on coherent states of the reversed harmonic oscillator, a wave function is proposed with the following three properties: (1) The mean values of position, r0, and velocity, v0, are parallel to the x axis; (2) The wave function is extended by a curve parameter w ≥ 0 such that, as a function of w, the mean values rw and vw describe a rectilinear orbit along the x axis with the mean initial values r0 and v0; (3) The mean energy is constant with respect to w by the leading order of the perturbation parameter ∈. For comparison, the classical one-dimensional equation of motion is integrated. Exact analytical equivalence between classical and the ∈ = 0 quantum limit is found, both for positive and negative mean energy. The curve parameter w is in 1-1 correspondence with time t ≥ 0.
This issue comprises two dozen research papers which are all in one sense or another devoted to models in which the interaction is singular and sharply localized; a typical example is a quantum particle interacting with a family of δ-type potentials. Such an idealization usually makes analysis of their properties considerably easier, sometimes allowing us to reduce it to a simple algebraic problem—this is why one speaks about solvable models. The subject can be traced back to the early days of quantum mechanics; however, the progress in this field was slow and uneven until the 1960s, mostly because singular interactions are often difficult to deal with mathematically and intuitive arguments do not work. After overcoming the initial difficulties the `classical' theory of point interactions was developed, and finally summarized in 1988 in a monograph by Albeverio, Gesztesy, Høegh-Krohn, and Holden, which you will find quoted in numerous places within this issue. A reliable way to judge theories is to observe the progress they make within one or two decades. In this case there is no doubt that the field has witnessed a continuous development and covered areas which nobody had thought of when the subject first emerged. The reader may see it in the second edition of the aforementioned book which was published by AMS Chelsea only recently and contained a brief survey of these new achievements. It is no coincidence that this topical issue appears at the same time; it has been conceived as its counterpart and a forum at which fresh results in the field can demonstrated. Let us briefly survey the contents of the issue. While the papers included have in common the basic subject, they represent a broad spectrum philosophically as well as technically, and any attempt to classify them is somewhat futile. Nevertheless, we will divide them into a few groups. The first comprises contributions directly related to the usual point-interaction ideology. M Correggi and one of the editors study a toy model of a decay under the influence of a time-periodic δ potential. E Demiralp describes the spectrum of a spherical harmonic oscillator amended with a concentric family of δ-shell interactions. Another of the editors presents an isoperimetric problem for point interactions arranged at vertices of a polygon. W Huddell and R Hughes show how singular perturbations of a one-dimensional Dirac operator can be approximated by regular potentials, and J Brasche constructs a family of Hamiltonians in which the singular interaction has a more complicated support, namely a Brownian path. Finally, B Pavlov and I Antoniou apply the singular perturbation technique to another classical Hamiltonian, that of a generalized Friedrichs model; no matter that the unperturbed observable is called momentum in their paper. The three papers in the following group are distinguished by the fact that they consider systems which are fully or partially periodic. F Bentosela and M Tater analyse scattering on a crystalline `slab' modelled by point interactions distributed periodically on a finite number of parallel plates. E de Prunelé studies evolution of wavepackets in crystal models of different geometries, and M Avdonin et al discuss a simple model of a spin-dependent scattering on a one-dimensional array of quantum dots. The next group of papers is devoted to a topic which was untouched at the time of the aforementioned first edition, namely quantum graphs, which became a subject of interest after numerous applications of such systems to semiconductor, carbon and other nanostructures. Most contributions here deal with the `usual' model in which the Hamiltonian is a Schrödinger operator supported by the graph. P Kuchment describes spectral properties of such graphs, in particular periodic ones and those with decorations. S Albeverio and K Pankrashkin present a modification of Krein's formula which is suitable for constructing Hamiltonians of quantum graphs using boundary conditions at vertices directly. Two papers are devoted to inverse problems in this context: M Harmer studies inverse scattering for the matrix Schrödinger operator on the halfline with applications to star graphs, while P Kurasov and M Nowaczyk give a mathematically rigorous version of the known Gutkin–Smilansky result on the inverse spectral problem. The paper by O Post contributes to the question of how graphs can be approximated by more realistic `fat' graphs, and describes a class leading to disconnected quantum graphs. Finally, S Kondej and one of the editors study scattering in the context of `leaky' graphs which takes quantum tunnelling into account. While most results in this field describe one-particle Hamiltonians, more complicated systems have also been studied. In this issue we have three examples. C Cacciapuito, R Carlone, and R Figari discuss decoherence in a simple model of two particles, one heavy and one light, interacting through a δ potential; they give a rigorous meaning to a formula derived by Joos and Zeh. A related model by R Figari and A Teta is used to describe ionization. M Hallnäs, E Langmann, and C Paufler treat a true N -body situation, namely a model of one-dimensional gas of distinguishable particles interacting through generalized point interactions; they write the Bethe ansatz and present the solution of a particular case. The last group is a collection of contributions which in one sense or another are outside quantum mechanics, either modifying its postulates or applying it to a different physical situation. The latter applies to the paper of D Noja and A Posilicano in which they study nonlinear wave equations with point perturbations and show the existence of a solution to the Cauchy problem. F Coutinho et al discuss one-dimensional point interactions with energy-dependent coupling constant, S Albeverio and S Kuzhel examine a class of point interactions which are not symmetric but P-symmetric, where P is the parity operator, and M Znojil and V Jakubský consider a `double-well' PT-symmetric model with two δ interactions with an imaginary coupling. The last two papers present mathematical constructions. Yu Shondin demonstrates a way to define an interaction more singular than the usual δ potentials obtained by means of self-adjoint extensions, and V Koshmanenko presents a construction of strongly singular perturbations leading to rather unusual `Hamiltonians'.
The problem of deriving macroscopic properties from the Hamiltonian of the hydrogen atom is resumed by extending previous results in the literature, which predicted elliptic orbits, into the region of hyperbolic orbits. As a main tool, coherent states of the harmonic oscillator are used which are continued to imaginary frequencies. The Kustaanheimo-Stiefel (KS) map is applied to transform the original configuration space into the product space of four harmonic oscillators with a constraint. The relation derived between real time and oscillator (pseudo) time includes quantum corrections. In the limit $\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$, the time-dependent mean values of position and velocity describe the classical motion on a hyperbola and a circular hodograph, respectively. Moreover, the connection between pseudotime and real time comes out in analogy to Kepler's equation for elliptic orbits. The mean-square-root deviations of position and velocity components behave similarly in time to the corresponding ones of a spreading Gaussian wave packet in free space. To check the approximate treatment of the constraint, its contribution to the mean energy is determined with the result that it is negligible except for energy values close to the parabolic orbit with eccentricity equal to 1. It is inevitable to introduce a suitable scalar product in R4{\mathbb{R}}^{4}R4 which makes both the transformed Hamiltonian and the velocity operators Hermitian. An elementary necessary criterion is given for the energy interval where the constraint can be approximated by averaging.