Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

Mermin habitually answers opinions, real and abstract

Sabine Hossenfelder

Published Sep 1, 2009• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.4797210

Related papers

Mermin habitually answers opinions, real and abstract

Fletcher J. Goldin

Physics Today•Sep 1, 2009•0 citations

Mermin habitually answers opinions, real and abstract

Amin N. Dharamsi

(First paragraph) Because QFT is so neglected by the public (and by many physicists), I am writing a book that presents it without equations. A draft copy of the work, The Theory That Escaped Einstein, can be found through an internet search. Feedback is appreciated.

Physics Today•Sep 1, 2009•1 citation

Debunking the Mermin Contraption

Allen D. Allen

Physics Essays•Jun 1, 1992•0 citations

The Presence of David Mermin

Daniel M. Greenberger, Abner Shimony

Foundations of Physics•Oct 1, 2003•0 citations

Mermin habitually answers opinions, real and abstract

A. Burov

David Mermin seems to advocate the view of theoretical paradoxes and controversies of quantum mechanics and field theory as problems of “tools” of a linguistic or otherwise technical nature. His advice is not to “make life harder than it needs to be.” First, philosophical reduction of a fundamental science to a human tool goes against the main quest of science – the quest for objective truth about the universe. Second, the suggested advice seems more conducive to peace of mind than to scientific inquiry. Paradoxes and contradictions have always been a rich source of inspiration and contemplation for those who are seeking new knowledge.© 2009 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Sep 1, 2009•0 citations

Mermin's Mouse

Detlef Dürr

•Jul 1, 2014•0 citations
David Mermin seems to advocate the view of theoretical paradoxes and controversies of quantum mechanics and field theory as problems of “tools” of a linguistic or otherwise technical nature. His advice is not to “make life harder than it needs to be.” First, philosophical reduction of a fundamental science to a human tool goes against the main quest of science – the quest for objective truth about the universe. Second, the suggested advice seems more conducive to peace of mind than to scientific inquiry. Paradoxes and contradictions have always been a rich source of inspiration and contemplation for those who are seeking new knowledge.© 2009 American Institute of Physics.