Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

Deborah Jin

John L. Bohn

Published Jan 1, 2017• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Deborah Jin—“Debbie” to everybody—was a bright star in the field of experimental atomic, molecular, and optical (AMO) physics. She died on 15 September 2016 in Boulder, Colorado, after battling cancer. She was 47. Deborah Jin PPT|High resolutionBorn in Stanford, California, on 15 November 1968, Debbie was raised in Florida, in a home with physics in the air. Her parents and her older brother studied physics; only her younger sister, an attorney, escaped untouched by the bug.Debbie pursued physics as an undergraduate at Princeton University and showed remarkable skill for doing both actual and class work, which earned her the university’s 1990 Allen G. Shenstone Prize in experimental physics. In 1995 she received her PhD, under the guidance of Tom Rosenbaum, from the University of Chicago. For her thesis, she explored the nature of anisotropies in heavy-fermion superconductors such as UPt3. That experience also taught her important life skills, such as hanging through the floor of the laboratory above in order to load her samples into a dilution refrigerator.Debbie was lured away from solid-state physics by the siren call of JILA at the University of Colorado, where Eric Cornell was “confident” that the first experimental achievement of Bose–Einstein condensation was around the corner. Having no experience in lasers or optics, Debbie nevertheless boldly changed fields and learned a new skill set on the job. In the end, Cornell was right, and Debbie led the first critical studies of the nature of Bose–Einstein condensates. To reward her success, Cornell sent Debbie to deliver a plenary talk at the American Physical Society’s division of AMO physics meeting in 1996. As a first-year postdoc, in front of an audience of some 800 scientists, Debbie went, in a half hour, from being unknown to embodying the future of cold-atom physics.Although she was flooded with job offers, Debbie decided to remain at JILA, in a permanent position with NIST. That not only would give her access to a great research facility with outstanding colleagues, it would also solve a two-body problem by allowing her husband (me, also an AMO physicist) to remain gainfully employed. In 1997 Debbie turned her attention away from the “boring” study of bosons to the study of ultracold, quantum-degenerate Fermi gases because, as she would say, “fermions are real individualists!” That was a much harder experimental challenge: The evaporative cooling methods that produced Bose–Einstein condensates require frequent collisions for rethermalization, so they did not work for fermions, which nominally hardly collide at ultralow temperatures. Nevertheless, Debbie, along with graduate student Brian DeMarco, surmounted that difficulty and produced the first quantum Fermi gas within 18 months of inheriting an empty lab.Debbie’s achievements came full circle in a way when in 2003 she, graduate student Cindy Regal, and postdoc Markus Greiner coaxed ultracold fermions into Cooper-like pairs to form a Fermi superfluid. Their work answered important, long-standing questions about how the system evolves into a condensate of diatomic molecules as an interaction parameter is tuned. Ironically, although the techniques were different, Debbie’s work was again focused on fermions (potassium-40 atoms) as opposed to the “heavy electrons,” dressed by lattice interactions, in her graduate studies.In 2008, in collaboration with Jun Ye, Debbie achieved another long-standing experimental goal of welding together pairs of ultracold atoms to form ultracold, ground-state polar molecules. With that revolutionary achievement came fundamental new observations of unusual chemical kinetics, since the reactants could be placed into single quantum states in all degrees of freedom—rotation, vibration, spin, and even the relative motion of the molecules. Reaction rates could be influenced by flipping a nuclear spin or applying modest electric fields.In addition to being exceptionally smart and hardworking, Debbie possessed unparalleled common sense and an ability to focus on the important details. Her successes were frequently rewarded; the walls of her office groaned with the weight of plaques denoting the many awards she garnered. In her videotaped talks you can still see her brilliance shine through, in both the science and the remarkable skill with which she explained it; you can also see her famous dimples.In the face of tremendous professional success, Debbie remained humble and good-natured. She would grant an interview to a high school student as readily as she would to a professional journalist. She mentored 16 PhD students and lots of postdocs, and she made time to talk to them frequently—about physics and about life in general. Hanging out during group cookouts or ski trips was an important part of life in the Jin group.Debbie was aware of being a role model for women but did not dwell on it; instead, she preferred to let her achievements speak for themselves, while she worked where she could to help young women scientists. In one notable example, she spent a week in Paris as a recipient of the 2013 L’Oréal-UNESCO Award for Women in Science. Despite the exhausting schedule, Debbie reveled in the chance to interact with the young women from around the world who were receiving postdoctoral fellowships. She encouraged them to be fermions themselves and to pursue their individual talents and interests to the best of their ability.Away from science, Debbie was a warm and dedicated mother. She also played violin and ukulele; enjoyed camping, skiing, and other outdoor activities; and was an effective utility player for the JILA softball team. She touched thousands of people in and out of science who will miss her terribly.© 2017 American Institute of Physics.

DOI
10.1063/pt.3.3435

Related papers

Deborah S. Jin 1968–2016: Trailblazer of ultracold science

Kang-Kuen Ni, Markus Greiner, Silke Ospelkaus

Deborah Jin, a pioneer in modern atomic and molecular physics, passed away on September 15, 2016, at age 47, after a courageous fight with cancer. She was a world renowned scientist at JILA (formerly known as the Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics) in Boulder, Colorado, a joint institute of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of Colorado. Her research field was the world of atoms and molecules and their quantum mechanical behavior at temperatures close to absolute zero. Although she was a pioneer in her field, Jin was also humble and modest. She was a role model to many physicists worldwide through her enthusiastic and methodical approach to science.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences•Dec 30, 2016•4 citations

The Fermionic Cousin of Bose–Einstein Condensate Makes its Debut

Barbara Goss Levi

Experimenters have been romping in the BEC playground ever since a gaseous Bose–Einstein condensate was first produced four years ago. It was almost inevitable, then, that researchers would also want to explore its fermionic cousin—the quantum degenerate state one expects to get by cooling a gas of atoms with half-integer spins. Whereas the integer-spin atoms (bosons) in a Bose–Einstein condensate all pile into the lowest energy state, the half-integer spin atoms (fermions) are prevented from doing so by the Pauli exclusion principle, which prohibits two identical fermions from occupying the same quantum state. Instead, the atoms fill all the lowest energy levels up to the Fermi energy, just as electrons do in a solid. The crossover into this quantum degenerate state is gradual, compared to the abrupt phase transition into a Bose condensate. But that crossover has now been convincingly detected by Deborah Jin, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Brian DeMarco, a physics graduate student at the University of Colorado at Boulder, both working at JILA.

Physics Today•Oct 1, 1999•1 citation

The creation and study of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapour

Carl Wieman

I will discuss the work of the JILA/University of Colorado group on the creation and study of Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) in a gas of very cold rubidium atoms. Over the years, a large number of students and postdocs have contributed to this work, with Eric Cornell and myself as the coleaders of the project. The data reported in this paper were obtained by Mike Anderson, Eric Burt, Jason Ensher, Rich Ghrist, Deborah Jin, Mike Matthews and Chris Myatt. Theoretical contributions have been provided by Murray Holland, Jinx Cooper, Brett Esry and Chris Greene. In the first part of this paper, I will briefly discuss how we create and observe BEC; in the second portion, I will discuss some of the work on BEC that has been carried out at JILA in the past year.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Dec 15, 1997•2 citations

A Fermi gas of atoms

Deborah Jin

WHEN the 2001 Nobel Prize for Physics was awarded to Eric Cornell and Carl Wieman from JILA in Boulder, Colorado, and to Wolfgang Ketterle from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, they were recognized for creating and studying Bose–Einstein condensates – dilute gases of atoms that are all in the same quantum state. Their remarkable achievement enabled "quantum gases" to be studied experimentally for the first time, and jump-started new sub-fields of research, including gaseous superfluidity, atom lasers and matter–wave optics.

Physics World•Apr 1, 2002•9 citations

Adilet Imambekov

Dmitry A. Abanin, L. I. Glazman, Eugene Demler

A rising star in the field of quantum many-body physics, Adilet Imambekov died on 18 July 2012 at age 30 while climbing Khan Tengri mountain in Kazakhstan. Despite his youth, Adilet made key contributions to the field of strongly correlated systems; in particular, he devised a new conceptual framework for describing universal dynamics of one-dimensional quantum systems. Adilet’s work was distinguished by a combination of deep physical insight, mathematical rigor, and elegance.Born on 2 September 1981, Adilet grew up in Zhambyl (now Taraz) and Almaty, Kazakhstan. His extraordinary abilities were evident by age 14, when he won national physics and mathematics competitions, then attended one of the former Soviet Union’s best science high schools, Kolmogorov Lyceum in Moscow. Adilet became the first student in 14 years to graduate with highest honors. As a physics Olympiads competitor, he took first-place prizes in the 1997 and 1998 National Russian Olympiads and received a gold medal at the 1998 International Physics Olympiad.Adilet continued his studies at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. In his junior year, he passed several Landau Theoretical Minimum exams. He then received his basic theoretical physics training as a member of the Laudau Institute’s theoretical group.After going to Harvard University in 2002 for his PhD studies, Adilet joined the group of one of us (Demler) and concentrated on many-body physics of cold atoms. His first work, which still serves as a guide for new experiments, predicted numerous exotic states for bosons with nonzero spin in an optical lattice.With his unique ability to fuse ideas from solid-state physics, atomic physics, and mathematics, Adilet was able to make progress in difficult problems when other attempts failed. His approach to the problem of interference between low-dimensional Bose condensates provides a good example. Adilet came up with a beautiful mapping of the problem at hand onto a seemingly unrelated one of statistical properties of random surfaces. His work became instrumental for the interpretation of subsequent experiments in which a new universal dynamical phenomenon, prethermalization, was demonstrated.Adilet uniquely combined mathematical intuition with deep insight into the physics of quantum phenomena. He went to Yale University to work with another of us (Glazman) as a postdoc in 2007 and became interested in the dynamics of 1D quantum fluids, conventionally described by the widely known Luttinger liquid theory. In simplifying the problem, the standard theory artificially imposes symmetry that distorts a fluid’s true dynamic response functions; Adilet’s contributions were essential to building a theory free of such artificial assumptions. He combined the existing perturbative results with his own analysis of an integrable Lieb–Liniger model and foresaw the emerging universal dynamic properties of a fluid.Less than a year later, Adilet built what he called the nonlinear Luttinger liquid theory, which universally describes low-energy excitations of a fluid made of particles with a generic, nonlinear dispersion relation. The theory’s beauty is in its simplicity and versatility. It answered the existing questions about the dynamic responses while also providing a platform for tackling other, more difficult issues. While Adilet was making big strides toward developing a theory of quantum quenches and a kinetic theory of nonlinear Luttinger liquid, he joined Rice University as a junior faculty member in 2009.Remarkably, Adilet’s demeanor did not change despite the challenges of being a tenure-track faculty member. He remained warm and open. He quickly forged collaborations with his Rice colleagues and ventured into, for him, a new area of solid-state optics.Adilet pursued his interests with utmost commitment. For example, when he began graduate school at Harvard, he became fascinated with climbing, mountaineering, and endurance sports. He started training nearly every day, which included running along the Charles River and rock climbing in New Hampshire when possible. Within a few years, he conquered two challenging mountains in Alaska and China and became rather well known among climbers. He also twice qualified for the Boston Marathon, and in May 2012 he won his only Ironman triathlon competition.Each of us cherished every opportunity to talk to or collaborate with Adilet. He had a wonderful sense of humor and often brightened even the most challenging and confusing physics topic with an unexpected joke.Adilet’s commitment and love of life inspired many of his friends to pursue their own dreams. He showed by example that little is impossible if you are dedicated. Before going on his last trip to Kazakhstan, Adilet was talking to one of us about how one should attempt to get the most valuable result in the most intellectually challenging problem rather than concentrating on getting every paper published: “There is simply too little time,” he said. Indeed, Adilet was given very little time. But it was enough for him to make long-lasting contributions to physics and to deeply affect the lives of those who were fortunate enough to know him. Adilet Imambekov DANIEL E. PROBER, YALE UNIVERSITYPPT|High resolution© 2013 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Mar 29, 2013•0 citations

Former student pays tribute to Wineland

D. Kielpinski

Not only is David Wineland a great scientist, as the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences recently confirmed, he is also an exceptional human being.I had the privilege of working for Dave as a PhD student from 1997 to 2001, developing one of the first quantum computers. Our team used individual trapped ions: charged atoms suspended in vacuum by electric fields. Since the early 1970s, Dave had developed a huge range of techniques for trapping ions and controlling their quantum behavior. Our task was to go from controlling a single ion to controlling two, three, or four.The team consisted of NIST staff member Christopher Monroe (now a professor at the University of Maryland’s Joint Quantum Institute and a world leader in his own right), four postdoctoral researchers, a student nearing PhD completion, and me—the junior student. A standard university lab is lucky to have one or two postdoctoral researchers managing a herd of PhD students. Here the postdocs were the backbone of the team.Dave’s quiet, understated, but ever-present guidance was the key that helped me, as a fumbling junior student, find my way among such a crowd of experts. Dave valued everyone, and we all responded to his attitude by giving our best to the team. Of course, we wanted to advance in our careers, but we also wanted to help each other the way Dave helped each of us. His concern for all was reflected in the patience that the senior researchers showed with me.My experience is just one example of Dave’s exceptional conduct toward his colleagues. Through vicissitudes of competition or technical obstacles to research, Dave has good words for everyone, from junior members of his team to internationally recognized scientists. He is the first to recognize the contributions of others and often the last to point out his own. Many members of the quantum physics community have even feared that his modesty has cost him some appreciation, so this long-deserved Nobel Prize is all the sweeter.One can hardly overstate Dave’s influence on the atomic and quantum physics communities over the past five decades. As with Norman Ramsey, his own PhD adviser a generation earlier, it sometimes seems like half of the field’s best researchers have worked with Dave, and the best young physicists in the field still flock to his lab.Dave’s team continues to grow in size and quality and is outstripped only by his own creativity and dedication. Any day now, I fully expect him to astonish me and the rest of his colleagues with yet another new and unlikely idea that somehow turns out beautifully. I hope many more junior PhD students have the same good fortune that I did, the day I came to work for Dave.© 2013 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Dec 28, 2012•0 citations
Deborah Jin—“Debbie” to everybody—was a bright star in the field of experimental atomic, molecular, and optical (AMO) physics. She died on 15 September 2016 in Boulder, Colorado, after battling cancer. She was 47. Deborah Jin PPT|High resolutionBorn in Stanford, California, on 15 November 1968, Debbie was raised in Florida, in a home with physics in the air. Her parents and her older brother studied physics; only her younger sister, an attorney, escaped untouched by the bug.Debbie pursued physics as an undergraduate at Princeton University and showed remarkable skill for doing both actual and class work, which earned her the university’s 1990 Allen G. Shenstone Prize in experimental physics. In 1995 she received her PhD, under the guidance of Tom Rosenbaum, from the University of Chicago. For her thesis, she explored the nature of anisotropies in heavy-fermion superconductors such as UPt3. That experience also taught her important life skills, such as hanging through the floor of the laboratory above in order to load her samples into a dilution refrigerator.Debbie was lured away from solid-state physics by the siren call of JILA at the University of Colorado, where Eric Cornell was “confident” that the first experimental achievement of Bose–Einstein condensation was around the corner. Having no experience in lasers or optics, Debbie nevertheless boldly changed fields and learned a new skill set on the job. In the end, Cornell was right, and Debbie led the first critical studies of the nature of Bose–Einstein condensates. To reward her success, Cornell sent Debbie to deliver a plenary talk at the American Physical Society’s division of AMO physics meeting in 1996. As a first-year postdoc, in front of an audience of some 800 scientists, Debbie went, in a half hour, from being unknown to embodying the future of cold-atom physics.Although she was flooded with job offers, Debbie decided to remain at JILA, in a permanent position with NIST. That not only would give her access to a great research facility with outstanding colleagues, it would also solve a two-body problem by allowing her husband (me, also an AMO physicist) to remain gainfully employed. In 1997 Debbie turned her attention away from the “boring” study of bosons to the study of ultracold, quantum-degenerate Fermi gases because, as she would say, “fermions are real individualists!” That was a much harder experimental challenge: The evaporative cooling methods that produced Bose–Einstein condensates require frequent collisions for rethermalization, so they did not work for fermions, which nominally hardly collide at ultralow temperatures. Nevertheless, Debbie, along with graduate student Brian DeMarco, surmounted that difficulty and produced the first quantum Fermi gas within 18 months of inheriting an empty lab.Debbie’s achievements came full circle in a way when in 2003 she, graduate student Cindy Regal, and postdoc Markus Greiner coaxed ultracold fermions into Cooper-like pairs to form a Fermi superfluid. Their work answered important, long-standing questions about how the system evolves into a condensate of diatomic molecules as an interaction parameter is tuned. Ironically, although the techniques were different, Debbie’s work was again focused on fermions (potassium-40 atoms) as opposed to the “heavy electrons,” dressed by lattice interactions, in her graduate studies.In 2008, in collaboration with Jun Ye, Debbie achieved another long-standing experimental goal of welding together pairs of ultracold atoms to form ultracold, ground-state polar molecules. With that revolutionary achievement came fundamental new observations of unusual chemical kinetics, since the reactants could be placed into single quantum states in all degrees of freedom—rotation, vibration, spin, and even the relative motion of the molecules. Reaction rates could be influenced by flipping a nuclear spin or applying modest electric fields.In addition to being exceptionally smart and hardworking, Debbie possessed unparalleled common sense and an ability to focus on the important details. Her successes were frequently rewarded; the walls of her office groaned with the weight of plaques denoting the many awards she garnered. In her videotaped talks you can still see her brilliance shine through, in both the science and the remarkable skill with which she explained it; you can also see her famous dimples.In the face of tremendous professional success, Debbie remained humble and good-natured. She would grant an interview to a high school student as readily as she would to a professional journalist. She mentored 16 PhD students and lots of postdocs, and she made time to talk to them frequently—about physics and about life in general. Hanging out during group cookouts or ski trips was an important part of life in the Jin group.Debbie was aware of being a role model for women but did not dwell on it; instead, she preferred to let her achievements speak for themselves, while she worked where she could to help young women scientists. In one notable example, she spent a week in Paris as a recipient of the 2013 L’Oréal-UNESCO Award for Women in Science. Despite the exhausting schedule, Debbie reveled in the chance to interact with the young women from around the world who were receiving postdoctoral fellowships. She encouraged them to be fermions themselves and to pursue their individual talents and interests to the best of their ability.Away from science, Debbie was a warm and dedicated mother. She also played violin and ukulele; enjoyed camping, skiing, and other outdoor activities; and was an effective utility player for the JILA softball team. She touched thousands of people in and out of science who will miss her terribly.© 2017 American Institute of Physics.
Deborah Jin, a pioneer in modern atomic and molecular physics, passed away on September 15, 2016, at age 47, after a courageous fight with cancer. She was a world renowned scientist at JILA (formerly known as the Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics) in Boulder, Colorado, a joint institute of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of Colorado. Her research field was the world of atoms and molecules and their quantum mechanical behavior at temperatures close to absolute zero. Although she was a pioneer in her field, Jin was also humble and modest. She was a role model to many physicists worldwide through her enthusiastic and methodical approach to science.
Experimenters have been romping in the BEC playground ever since a gaseous Bose–Einstein condensate was first produced four years ago. It was almost inevitable, then, that researchers would also want to explore its fermionic cousin—the quantum degenerate state one expects to get by cooling a gas of atoms with half-integer spins. Whereas the integer-spin atoms (bosons) in a Bose–Einstein condensate all pile into the lowest energy state, the half-integer spin atoms (fermions) are prevented from doing so by the Pauli exclusion principle, which prohibits two identical fermions from occupying the same quantum state. Instead, the atoms fill all the lowest energy levels up to the Fermi energy, just as electrons do in a solid. The crossover into this quantum degenerate state is gradual, compared to the abrupt phase transition into a Bose condensate. But that crossover has now been convincingly detected by Deborah Jin, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Brian DeMarco, a physics graduate student at the University of Colorado at Boulder, both working at JILA.
I will discuss the work of the JILA/University of Colorado group on the creation and study of Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) in a gas of very cold rubidium atoms. Over the years, a large number of students and postdocs have contributed to this work, with Eric Cornell and myself as the coleaders of the project. The data reported in this paper were obtained by Mike Anderson, Eric Burt, Jason Ensher, Rich Ghrist, Deborah Jin, Mike Matthews and Chris Myatt. Theoretical contributions have been provided by Murray Holland, Jinx Cooper, Brett Esry and Chris Greene. In the first part of this paper, I will briefly discuss how we create and observe BEC; in the second portion, I will discuss some of the work on BEC that has been carried out at JILA in the past year.
WHEN the 2001 Nobel Prize for Physics was awarded to Eric Cornell and Carl Wieman from JILA in Boulder, Colorado, and to Wolfgang Ketterle from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, they were recognized for creating and studying Bose–Einstein condensates – dilute gases of atoms that are all in the same quantum state. Their remarkable achievement enabled "quantum gases" to be studied experimentally for the first time, and jump-started new sub-fields of research, including gaseous superfluidity, atom lasers and matter–wave optics.
A rising star in the field of quantum many-body physics, Adilet Imambekov died on 18 July 2012 at age 30 while climbing Khan Tengri mountain in Kazakhstan. Despite his youth, Adilet made key contributions to the field of strongly correlated systems; in particular, he devised a new conceptual framework for describing universal dynamics of one-dimensional quantum systems. Adilet’s work was distinguished by a combination of deep physical insight, mathematical rigor, and elegance.Born on 2 September 1981, Adilet grew up in Zhambyl (now Taraz) and Almaty, Kazakhstan. His extraordinary abilities were evident by age 14, when he won national physics and mathematics competitions, then attended one of the former Soviet Union’s best science high schools, Kolmogorov Lyceum in Moscow. Adilet became the first student in 14 years to graduate with highest honors. As a physics Olympiads competitor, he took first-place prizes in the 1997 and 1998 National Russian Olympiads and received a gold medal at the 1998 International Physics Olympiad.Adilet continued his studies at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. In his junior year, he passed several Landau Theoretical Minimum exams. He then received his basic theoretical physics training as a member of the Laudau Institute’s theoretical group.After going to Harvard University in 2002 for his PhD studies, Adilet joined the group of one of us (Demler) and concentrated on many-body physics of cold atoms. His first work, which still serves as a guide for new experiments, predicted numerous exotic states for bosons with nonzero spin in an optical lattice.With his unique ability to fuse ideas from solid-state physics, atomic physics, and mathematics, Adilet was able to make progress in difficult problems when other attempts failed. His approach to the problem of interference between low-dimensional Bose condensates provides a good example. Adilet came up with a beautiful mapping of the problem at hand onto a seemingly unrelated one of statistical properties of random surfaces. His work became instrumental for the interpretation of subsequent experiments in which a new universal dynamical phenomenon, prethermalization, was demonstrated.Adilet uniquely combined mathematical intuition with deep insight into the physics of quantum phenomena. He went to Yale University to work with another of us (Glazman) as a postdoc in 2007 and became interested in the dynamics of 1D quantum fluids, conventionally described by the widely known Luttinger liquid theory. In simplifying the problem, the standard theory artificially imposes symmetry that distorts a fluid’s true dynamic response functions; Adilet’s contributions were essential to building a theory free of such artificial assumptions. He combined the existing perturbative results with his own analysis of an integrable Lieb–Liniger model and foresaw the emerging universal dynamic properties of a fluid.Less than a year later, Adilet built what he called the nonlinear Luttinger liquid theory, which universally describes low-energy excitations of a fluid made of particles with a generic, nonlinear dispersion relation. The theory’s beauty is in its simplicity and versatility. It answered the existing questions about the dynamic responses while also providing a platform for tackling other, more difficult issues. While Adilet was making big strides toward developing a theory of quantum quenches and a kinetic theory of nonlinear Luttinger liquid, he joined Rice University as a junior faculty member in 2009.Remarkably, Adilet’s demeanor did not change despite the challenges of being a tenure-track faculty member. He remained warm and open. He quickly forged collaborations with his Rice colleagues and ventured into, for him, a new area of solid-state optics.Adilet pursued his interests with utmost commitment. For example, when he began graduate school at Harvard, he became fascinated with climbing, mountaineering, and endurance sports. He started training nearly every day, which included running along the Charles River and rock climbing in New Hampshire when possible. Within a few years, he conquered two challenging mountains in Alaska and China and became rather well known among climbers. He also twice qualified for the Boston Marathon, and in May 2012 he won his only Ironman triathlon competition.Each of us cherished every opportunity to talk to or collaborate with Adilet. He had a wonderful sense of humor and often brightened even the most challenging and confusing physics topic with an unexpected joke.Adilet’s commitment and love of life inspired many of his friends to pursue their own dreams. He showed by example that little is impossible if you are dedicated. Before going on his last trip to Kazakhstan, Adilet was talking to one of us about how one should attempt to get the most valuable result in the most intellectually challenging problem rather than concentrating on getting every paper published: “There is simply too little time,” he said. Indeed, Adilet was given very little time. But it was enough for him to make long-lasting contributions to physics and to deeply affect the lives of those who were fortunate enough to know him. Adilet Imambekov DANIEL E. PROBER, YALE UNIVERSITYPPT|High resolution© 2013 American Institute of Physics.
Not only is David Wineland a great scientist, as the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences recently confirmed, he is also an exceptional human being.I had the privilege of working for Dave as a PhD student from 1997 to 2001, developing one of the first quantum computers. Our team used individual trapped ions: charged atoms suspended in vacuum by electric fields. Since the early 1970s, Dave had developed a huge range of techniques for trapping ions and controlling their quantum behavior. Our task was to go from controlling a single ion to controlling two, three, or four.The team consisted of NIST staff member Christopher Monroe (now a professor at the University of Maryland’s Joint Quantum Institute and a world leader in his own right), four postdoctoral researchers, a student nearing PhD completion, and me—the junior student. A standard university lab is lucky to have one or two postdoctoral researchers managing a herd of PhD students. Here the postdocs were the backbone of the team.Dave’s quiet, understated, but ever-present guidance was the key that helped me, as a fumbling junior student, find my way among such a crowd of experts. Dave valued everyone, and we all responded to his attitude by giving our best to the team. Of course, we wanted to advance in our careers, but we also wanted to help each other the way Dave helped each of us. His concern for all was reflected in the patience that the senior researchers showed with me.My experience is just one example of Dave’s exceptional conduct toward his colleagues. Through vicissitudes of competition or technical obstacles to research, Dave has good words for everyone, from junior members of his team to internationally recognized scientists. He is the first to recognize the contributions of others and often the last to point out his own. Many members of the quantum physics community have even feared that his modesty has cost him some appreciation, so this long-deserved Nobel Prize is all the sweeter.One can hardly overstate Dave’s influence on the atomic and quantum physics communities over the past five decades. As with Norman Ramsey, his own PhD adviser a generation earlier, it sometimes seems like half of the field’s best researchers have worked with Dave, and the best young physicists in the field still flock to his lab.Dave’s team continues to grow in size and quality and is outstripped only by his own creativity and dedication. Any day now, I fully expect him to astonish me and the rest of his colleagues with yet another new and unlikely idea that somehow turns out beautifully. I hope many more junior PhD students have the same good fortune that I did, the day I came to work for Dave.© 2013 American Institute of Physics.