Causal and Causally Separable Processes

Gianluca Francica

Wenjie Wei, Shengshi Pang

Indefinite causal order extends the conventional circuit paradigm by allowing local quantum operations to be connected without a predetermined global order. Within the process-matrix framework, it is characterized by causal nonseparability, whereas extensible causal separability (ECS) requires that, under arbitrary input-ancilla extensions, a process admit a recursive decomposition into components, each compatible with a particular operation acting first. Quantum circuits with classical control of causal order (QC-CC), in which previous outcomes dynamically determine which operation acts next, are known to generate ECS processes, but whether every ECS process admits such a realization has remained a longstanding open problem. We settle it through a generalized teleportation construction that realizes every multipartite ECS process as a QC-CC. We further establish consistency between ECS definitions for trivial and nontrivial global past and future systems. These results provide ECS with an exact operational interpretation and identify QC-CC as the complete circuit structure underlying this class of processes.

Ognyan Oreshkov, Christina Giarmatzi

The idea that events are equipped with a partial causal order is central to our understanding of physics in the tested regimes: given two pointlike events A and B , either A is in the causal past of B , B is in the causal past of A , or A and B are space-like separated. Operationally, the meaning of these order relations corresponds to constraints on the possible correlations between experiments performed in the vicinities of the respective events: if A is in the causal past of B , an experimenter at A could signal to an experimenter at B but not the other way around, while if A and B are space-like separated, no signaling is possible in either direction. In the context of a concrete physical theory, the correlations compatible with a given causal configuration may obey further constraints. For instance, space-like correlations in quantum mechanics arise from local measurements on joint quantum states, while time-like correlations are established via quantum channels. Similarly to other variables, however, the causal order of a set of events could be random, and little is understood about the constraints that causality implies in this case. A main difficulty concerns the fact that the order of events can now generally depend on the operations performed at the locations of these events, since, for instance, an operation at A could influence the order in which B and C occur in A ’s future. So far, no formal theory of causality compatible with such dynamical causal order has been developed. Apart from being of fundamental interest in the context of inferring causal relations, such a theory is imperative for understanding recent suggestions that the causal order of events in quantum mechanics can be indefinite. Here, we develop such a theory in the general multipartite case. Starting from a background-independent definition of causality, we derive an iteratively formulated canonical decomposition of multipartite causal correlations. For a fixed number of settings and outcomes for each party, these correlations form a polytope whose facets define causal inequalities. The case of quantum correlations in this paradigm is captured by the process matrix formalism. We investigate the link between causality and the closely related notion of causal separability of quantum processes, which we here define rigorously in analogy with the link between Bell locality and separability of quantum states. We show that causality and causal separability are not equivalent in general by giving an example of a physically admissible tripartite quantum process that is causal but not causally separable. We also show that there are causally separable quantum processes that become non-causal if extended by supplying the parties with entangled ancillas. This motivates the concepts of extensibly causal and extensibly causally separable (ECS) processes, for which the respective property remains invariant under extension. We characterize the class of ECS quantum processes in the tripartite case via simple conditions on the form of the process matrix. We show that the processes realizable by classically controlled quantum circuits are ECS and conjecture that the reverse also holds.

Richard Healey

Julian Wechs, Alastair A. Abbott, Cyril Branciard

The concept of causal (non)separability describes whether the causal order between parties that perform local quantum operations is well-defined or indefinite. Causal (non)separability in the general multipartite setting was introduced and studied in [Oreshkov and Giarmatzi, New J. Phys. 18, 093020 (2016); Wechs, Abbott, and Branciard, New J. Phys. 21, 013027 (2019)]. We resolve an open problem from these earlier works by showing -- using a novel "coherent teleportation technique" -- that a sufficient condition for causal separability identified in [Wechs, Abbott, and Branciard, New J. Phys. 21, 013027 (2019)] is also necessary, and thus provides a complete characterisation of multipartite causal separability. A consequence of this result is that all causally separable processes admit a realisation as generalised quantum circuits in which the order between the operations is classically controlled, known as "quantum circuits with classical control of causal order".

Aleks Kissinger, Sander Uijlen

Following on from the notion of (first-order) causality, which generalises the notion of being tracepreserving from CP-maps to abstract processes, we give a characterization for the most general kind of map which sends causal processes to causal processes. These new, second-order causal processes enable us to treat the input processes as 'local laboratories' whose causal ordering needs not be fixed in advance. Using this characterization, we give a fully-diagrammatic proof of a non-trivial theorem: namely that being causality-preserving on separable processes implies being 'completely' causality preserving. That is, causality is preserved even when the 'local laboratories' are allowed to have ancilla systems. An immediate consequence is that preserving causality is separable processes is equivalence to preserving causality for strongly non-signalling (a.k.a. localizable) processes.