In this chapter, the concepts of states and ensembles are critically reviewed. Among other things, it is shown that if the state of every composite quantum system contains all information that can be known about a system, states cannot be pure states. In Section 15.1, we criticize the standard practice of treating the state vector (that is, a pure state) as the complete description of a (single, or frequently prepared) quantum system. Section 15.2 shows that the density operator contains objective information about single quantum systems. This conclusion is reinforced in Section 15.3, which discusses Gibbs’ in his time revolutionary notion of fictitious ensembles for representing single macroscopic systems in equilibrium. The final Section 15.4 shows that pure states for objects in a bounded region of space are also questionable from the perspective of relativistic quantum field theory.
In this chapter, the concepts of states and ensembles are critically reviewed. Among other things, it is shown that if the state of every composite quantum system contains all information that can be known about a system, states cannot be pure states. In Section 15.1, we criticize the standard practice of treating the state vector (that is, a pure state) as the complete description of a (single, or frequently prepared) quantum system. Section 15.2 shows that the density operator contains objective information about single quantum systems. This conclusion is reinforced in Section 15.3, which discusses Gibbs’ in his time revolutionary notion of fictitious ensembles for representing single macroscopic systems in equilibrium. The final Section 15.4 shows that pure states for objects in a bounded region of space are also questionable from the perspective of relativistic quantum field theory.
From the outset statistical mechanics will be framed in the language of quantum theory. The typical macroscopic system is composed of multiple constituents, and hence described in some many-particle Hilbert space. In general, not much is known about such a system, certainly not the precise preparation of all its microscopic details. Thus, its description requires a more general notion of a quantum state, a so-called mixed state. This chapter begins with a brief review of the basic axioms of quantum theory regarding observables, pure states, measurements, and time evolution. Particular attention is paid to the use of projection operators and to the most elementary quantum system, a two-level system. The chapter then motivates the introduction of mixed states and examines in detail their mathematical representation and properties. It also dwells on the description of composite systems, introducing, in particular, the notions of statistical independence and correlations.
In this chapter the basic concepts of quantum theory are formulated via a self-consistent set of six postulates. These six postulates deal with the following: operator images of physical observables; properties of state vectors and wave functions; the connection with experimental measurements; coordinate-space forms of those operators having classical analogs; the primary dynamical equation of quantum mechanics; and the completeness of the eigenvectors of observables. The postulates are the framework on which the edifice of quantum mechanics is constructed. A separate section is devoted to the statement of each postulate and to a few examples chosen to illustrate or apply it. A comprehensive set of applications is presented in Chapters 6 and 7, where various 1-D systems are used as the vehicles for illustrating the postulates. The basic theory of this chapter is extended and developed in Chapters 8 and 9. Since probability is a key interpretational concept, a brief introduction to this topic is given in an appendix. We emphasize that our formulation of quantum theory (in this chapter and throughout this book) is restricted to the case of pure states. This is not a major restriction. It means that, when we consider ensembles of individual quantum systems (e.g., single particles, atoms, nuclei, etc.), all of the systems in the ensemble are assumed to be in the same quantum state, not necessarily an eigenstate of a quantal operator. Ensembles for which this assumption does not hold are described by a density operator or density matrix rather than by a pure state; treatments of such cases can be found in references cited later.
Abstract The fundamentals of the theory of density matrices are reviewed. The density matrix is introduced first in terms of state vectors for pure states over which a probability distribution is given. It is then shown that the applications of the density matrix do not require knowledge of the particular probability distribution over pure states that may have been used for its original determination. It is stressed that density matrices, like state vectors, describe ensembles rather than single systems, as determinism in quantum theory (except for some conservation laws) is of a statistical character only. The entropy of a quantum‐mechanical system is defined as the average per system of the entropy of an ensemble of systems described by the quantum‐mechanical (pure or mixed) state. For pure states this entropy is zero, in agreement with the fact that state vectors constitute the maximal information that can be given about a quantum‐mechanical system. As the entropy should be independent of the particular probability distribution over pure states that may have been used to form the mixed state, it is calculated from statistical considerations about an imaginary ensemble in which the eigenvalues of the density matrix are probabilities over pure states given by the eigenfunctions of the density matrix. The entropy is calculated for a mixture of two nonorthogonal states. The time evolution of the density matrix, in general, is not a unitary transformation, as observable systems are not closed and therefore in the Hamiltonian contain unknown external parameters that are not the same for the entire mixture. Therefore transitions between pure states and mixed states take place. Those from pure to mixed states take place spontaneously and irreversibly under increase of entropy. Transitions from mixed states to pure states can be fabricated; an example is given. As Wigner's thought experiment of mixing coherently the two beams from a Stern‐Gerlach apparatus according to estimates of Bohm should be impossible by loss of coherence in the gradient magnetic field, it is indicated how Wigner's ideas may be realized by using, instead, polarized light beams from birefringent crystals. After a brief review of the quantum theory of measurements and the various arguments usually given for the reducibility of state after the measurement, Wigner's argument against blind use of these arguments is interpreted as a limit of validity of the familiar probability rule of quantum theory, which should not be applied after an unsuccessful measurement. By splitting light beams coherently by glass plates, one can by the same apparatus have measurements both of the relative intensities of two coherent beams, and of interference effects between the two beams. This shows that complementarity applies to the individual systems in the beam, as they reach the glass plate where a choice must be made between two complementary possibilities of future measurement. Finally, by describing Schrödinger's cat by a density matrix and asking about its time dependence, it is shown that, if it were possible to measure the interference effects between living and dead cats used by some people as a justification for writing down a state vector for the cat, then this measurement could be used to revive some dead cats.
The state of a quantum mechanical system is represented by a nonzero vector in a separable Hilbert space. The word ‘represented’ means that knowledge of the state vector gives complete information on the properties of the system. In quantum mechanics, the state vectors are denoted using Dirac's notation. Several quantum systems possess a property called spin. Spin is a purely quantum mechanical feature which has no direct classical counterpart. The set of density matrices is a convex subset of the space of Hermitian operators whose ‘extreme’ points represent pure states. In quantum mechanics, observed quantities are called observables. A continuous spectrum is such that it contains no isolated points. The chapter discusses the case of measurement of observables with discrete spectrum.
This chapter presents a systematic treatment of quantum theory in terms of six groups of postulates on the fundamental properties of quantum systems: postulate on the description of pure states, postulate on the description of observables and their values, postulate on the transition from classical to quantum systems, postulates on the probabilistic relationship between states and observables, postulates on the time evolution of the system and postulate on states after measurement. It extends the basic theory to discuss mixed states, superselection rules and many-particle systems. The chapter presents a brief discussion of conceptual problems in quantum mechanics. A maximum amount of information about the system corresponds to a set of simultaneously measured values of a complete set of discrete observables of the system. Such an amount of information characterises a state of the system. States characterised by such a maximum amount of information about the system are called pure states.
Photon number state representation, especially the single-photon state representation, and the coherent state representation are widely used to specify the state of a radiation field. The concept of density operator or density matrix is introduced in the process of calculating the expectation value of a quantum observable. People then introduce and distinguish the pure state and mixed state. The quantum states of composite system, especially the state of two-photon field, are studied by introducing an 2-D Hilbert space constructed as the direct or tensor product of the Hilbert spaces of two subsystems. A simple model for the creation of single-photon state and multi-photon state is given with details. The concepts of product state, entangled state, and mixed state are introduced and distinguished. Coherent states form a complete set of vector space. Similar to number states, coherent states can be used as a vector basis for characterizing radiation field, except coherent states are nonorthogonal vectors in general.