This introductory chapter provides an overview of light. In particle language, a beam of light is a stream of photons—small massless particles with energy and momentum that travel at high speeds. In wave language, a beam of light is a series of waves of changing electric and magnetic field strength that have phase, amplitude, and wavelength, and—like photons—travel at high speeds. To intuitively describe what light does, one has to jump back and forth between these two interpretations. Sometimes, the results of experiments with light are more easily predicted or intuited using the mathematics and metaphors appropriate to waves; and sometimes the results are better explained using the mathematics and metaphors appropriate to particles.
This introductory chapter provides an overview of light. In particle language, a beam of light is a stream of photons—small massless particles with energy and momentum that travel at high speeds. In wave language, a beam of light is a series of waves of changing electric and magnetic field strength that have phase, amplitude, and wavelength, and—like photons—travel at high speeds. To intuitively describe what light does, one has to jump back and forth between these two interpretations. Sometimes, the results of experiments with light are more easily predicted or intuited using the mathematics and metaphors appropriate to waves; and sometimes the results are better explained using the mathematics and metaphors appropriate to particles.
Scientific inquiry took millennia to ascertain the true nature of light, and it is not possible here to attempt to recapitulate all of the philosophizing, hypotheses, arguments, and experimentation involved in that great debate. The main point of controversy was whether light should be considered as a particle or as a wave. Empedocles of Acragas (492–432 b.c.e .) was of the opinion that light is a “streaming substance” emitted by luminous bodies, and that light travels at a finite speed ( Sambursky, 1958 ). In the seventeenth century, Isaac Newton postulated that light is composed of particles and that color is connected with the size of those particles; however, his contemporary Christiaan Huygens argued that light is a wave that transfers energy but not substance ( Einstein & Infeld, 1966 , p. 105ff). It turns out that light is indeed a wave propagating via electric and magnetic fields, but in addition to exhibiting properties of waves (such as interference) it also exhibits properties of particles (such as momentum and localization). When treating light as particles, the individual quanta are called photons .
In quantum mechanics, light cannot be described in terms of waves and particles at the same time. However, the question about light "as it really is" implies a description that is independent from the constraints of measurement. It is rather preferable to incorporate both aspects in a causal ontological theory, especially if it simplifies explanation and improves predictions. Hence, the photon can be described as an extended longitudinal association of discrete indivisible constituents, which are held together by the effect of their own waves on each other. The same waves can then be used to interpret the force of interactions between different pulses of light, or between light and matter. The concept of wavemediated interaction between sub-photonic entities is entirely consistent with the observations of quantum mechanics. The key is to assume that elementary sources of waves never collide, and that they have constant parameters. Novel experimental implications follow from this approach. For example, the speed of propagation of changes within magnetic or electrostatic fields may not be equal to the speed of light. Also, interference fringes should be detectable beyond the volume of overlap of two non-entangled beams, but only in special experimental settings.
In this introductory chapter we focus on the interaction of optical fields with matter because it forms the basis of signal amplification in all optical amplifiers. According to our present understanding, optical fields are made of photons with properties precisely described by the laws of quantum field theory [1]. One consequence of this wave–particle duality is that optical fields can be described, in certain cases, as electromagnetic waves using Maxwell's equations and, in other cases, as a stream of massless particles (photons) such that each photon contains an energy h ν, where h is the Planck constant and ν, is the frequency of the optical field. In the case of monochromatic light, it is easy to relate the number of photons contained in an electromagnetic field to its associated energy density. However, this becomes difficult for optical fields that have broad spectral features, unless full statistical features of the signal are known [2]. Fortunately, in most cases that we deal with, such a detailed knowledge of photon statistics is not necessary or even required [3, 4]. Both the linear and the nonlinear optical studies carried out during the last century have shown us convincingly that a theoretical understanding of experimental observations can be gained just by using wave features of the optical fields if they are intense enough to contain more than a few photons [5]. It is this semiclassical approach that we adopt in this book. In cases where such a description is not adequate, one could supplement the wave picture with a quantum description.
It has already been noted (section 2.8) that high frequency electromagnetic radiation can exhibit particle-like behaviour. For example, in the sensitive type of detector known as a photomultiplier tube (described in Wehr and Richards, Physics of the Atom , 2nd edn, Addison-Wesley, section 10.5), a beam of low-intensity X-rays is detected as a sequence of isolated sharp pulses, such as would be produced by a stream of particles arriving at the detector. As was pointed out, it is not surprising that it is usually high-frequency radiation which travels in particle form; as shown in figure 2.39, a wave group of high-frequency radiation can be compressed into a very short time span. However, when we speak of a particle, we mean something more than an entity which arrives in a short time span. A particle has a definite size, or more exactly it has a well-defined energy and momentum. It was discovered around about 1900 that the same is true of an X-ray wave packet: all packets of a given frequency radiation carry the same energy and momentum. This revolutionary discovery means that we must treat the wave packets as particles on exactly the same footing as more familiar particles such as electrons. The electromagnetic particle is called a photon . There is a wealth of experimental evidence which may be used to define the properties of a photon. We shall be highly selective, however, and simply present two particularly clear-cut experiments, the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering, which enable one to define the energy and momentum of the photon in terms of the frequency and wave number of the corresponding wave. These experiments will be described in detail in section 4.1.
In the preceding chapters, we discussed the manipulation and observation of atomic variables associated with the internal degrees of freedom. A complete separation between internal and external degrees of freedom, like position and momentum, is not always possible, however. It therefore appears appropriate to include a discussion of the mechanical effects of light, which have received increasing attention in recent years. The transfer of momentum between photons and atoms, first observed more than sixty years ago, had to wait for the wide availability of lasers to become a useful experimental tool. In particular the cooling of atoms and atomic ions to very low temperatures has found numerous applications. Light-induced forces That light exerts mechanical forces on massive particles like atoms may appear surprising. To motivate the existence of such an effect two different approaches are possible. The first approach considers the light as a collection of photons that carry, apart from energy and angular momentum, linear momentum as well. Photons interacting with atoms can therefore change the momentum of the atoms. The second approach considers light as a wave, i.e., an inhomogeneous electromagnetic field interacting with the atomic dipole moment. Both approaches provide a possible description for the numerous phenomena that can occur in this context, but in many situations, one of them turns out to be more intuitive or more useful for calculations than the other.
In early 1999, a news article in the prestigious journal Nature led off with the announcement, "An experiment with atoms at nanokelvin temperatures has produced the remarkable observation of light pulses traveling at velocities of only 17 m/s." The review continued with the understatement, "Observation of light pulses propagating at a speed no faster than a swiftly moving bicycle...comes as a surprise." These findings (and their review) marked the beginning of the current wave of interest in the field that has come to be called "slow light.â" When we refer to "the speed of light," we typically mean c, the phase velocity of light in a vacuum, or the speed of propagation of the phase fronts of monochromatic light. The phase fronts travel more slowly through a material, propagating at the speed c/n, where n is the index of refraction of the medium. However, this ordinary slowing of the phase velocity is not slow light. "Slow light" and "fast light" refer to changes in the group velocity of light in a medium. A pulse of light can be decomposed mathematically into a group of monochromatic waves at slightly different frequencies, as in Fig. 19.1. In a dispersive material, these monochromatic waves travel at different speeds. When one views the propagation of the pulse as a whole, its apparent velocity depends on the extent of the spread of individual monochromatic-wave velocities. Each monochromatic wave travels at its own phase velocity, while the pulse travels at the group velocity. Of course, the group velocity of a pulse of light is not a new concept. The field of slow and fast light has drawn on theory and developments from the work of Sommerfeld and Brillouin from 1907 to 1914, experiments with early laser amplifiers in 1966, and other work done through the end of the 20th century. (For more of the history behind slow and fast light, see Refs. 8 and 9.)