Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

World Scientific series in 20th century physics

Diffraction

Published Jun 1, 2001• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812811875_0001

Related papers

Diffraction and Interference

Steven Beeson, James W. Mayer

Springer eBooks•Oct 20, 2007•3 citations

Experimental Limits of Ghost Diffraction: Popper’s Thought Experiment

Paul‐Antoine Moreau, Peter A. Morris, Ermes Toninelli +5 more

Quantum ghost diffraction harnesses quantum correlations to record diffraction or interference features using photons that have never interacted with the diffractive element. By designing an optical system in which the diffraction pattern can be produced by double slits of variable width either through a conventional diffraction scheme or a ghost diffraction scheme, we can explore the transition between the case where ghost diffraction behaves as conventional diffraction and the case where it does not. For conventional diffraction the angular extent increases as the scale of the diffracting object is reduced. By contrast, we show that no matter how small the scale of the diffracting object, the angular extent of the ghost diffraction is limited (by the transverse extent of the spatial correlations between beams). Our study is an experimental realisation of Popper's thought experiment on the validity of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. We discuss the implication of our results in this context and explain that it is compatible with, but not proof of, the Copenhagen interpretation.

Scientific Reports•Aug 29, 2018•16 citations

Diffraction et interférence

Joe McEvoy, Oscar Zarate

EDP Sciences eBooks•Nov 4, 2020•0 citations

Correlations in interference and diffraction

LU-MING DUAN GUANG-CAN GUO

Quantum formalism of Fraunhofer diffraction is obtained.The state of the diffraction optical field is connected with the state of the incident optical field by a diffraction factor.Based on this formalism, correlations of the diffraction modes are calculated with different kinds of incident optical fields.Influence of correlations of the incident modes on the diffraction pattern is analyzed and an explanation of the "ghost" diffraction is proposed.

Journal of Modern Optics•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Diffraction et interférence

Joe McEvoy, Oscar Sergio Zárate

EDP Sciences eBooks•Nov 4, 2020•0 citations

Correlations in interference and diffraction

L.-M. Duan, Guang‐Can Guo

Quantum formalism of Fraunhofer diffraction is obtained. The state of the diffraction optical field is connected with the state of the incident optical field by a diffraction factor. Based on this formalism, correlations of the diffraction modes are calculated with different kinds of incident optical fields. Influence of correlations of the incident modes on the diffraction pattern is analysed and an explanation of ‘ghost’ diffraction is proposed.

arXiv:quant-ph/9706042•Journal of Modern Optics•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations
Quantum ghost diffraction harnesses quantum correlations to record diffraction or interference features using photons that have never interacted with the diffractive element. By designing an optical system in which the diffraction pattern can be produced by double slits of variable width either through a conventional diffraction scheme or a ghost diffraction scheme, we can explore the transition between the case where ghost diffraction behaves as conventional diffraction and the case where it does not. For conventional diffraction the angular extent increases as the scale of the diffracting object is reduced. By contrast, we show that no matter how small the scale of the diffracting object, the angular extent of the ghost diffraction is limited (by the transverse extent of the spatial correlations between beams). Our study is an experimental realisation of Popper's thought experiment on the validity of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. We discuss the implication of our results in this context and explain that it is compatible with, but not proof of, the Copenhagen interpretation.