Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Princeton University Press eBooks

Thermal equilibrium states and phases

Published Nov 10, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv173f2jj.9

Related papers

Quantum mechanical description of thermal equilibrium states as eigenstates of relative-phase interactions

Tsunehiro Kobayashi

Physics Letters A•Nov 1, 1995•9 citations

Uniformity of the phase space and fluctuations in thermal equilibrium

Arkadiusz Majka, W. Wiślicki

arXiv:cond-mat/0211061•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Apr 25, 2003•6 citations

Thermal Equilibrium of a Macroscopic Quantum System in a Pure State

Sheldon Goldstein, David A. Huse, Joel L. Lebowitz +1 more

We consider the notion of thermal equilibrium for an individual closed macroscopic quantum system in a pure state, i.e., described by a wave function. The macroscopic properties in thermal equilibrium of such a system, determined by its wave function, must be the same as those obtained from thermodynamics, e.g., spatial uniformity of temperature and chemical potential. When this is true we say that the system is in macroscopic thermal equilibrium (MATE). Such a system may, however, not be in microscopic thermal equilibrium (MITE). The latter requires that the reduced density matrices of small subsystems be close to those obtained from the microcanonical, equivalently the canonical, ensemble for the whole system. The distinction between MITE and MATE is particularly relevant for systems with many-body localization for which the energy eigenfuctions fail to be in MITE while necessarily most of them, but not all, are in MATE. We note, however, that for generic macroscopic systems, including those with MBL, most wave functions in an energy shell are in both MATE and MITE. For a classical macroscopic system, MATE holds for most phase points on the energy surface, but MITE fails to hold for any phase point.

arXiv:1506.07494•Physical Review Letters•Sep 4, 2015•58 citations

Thermal Equilibrium

Peter Hertel

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

A density-matrix approach to thermal equilibrium states

Stella M. Peltier

The European Physical Journal A•Jun 1, 1987•0 citations

Thermal Effect in Lipkin Model. I: Thermal Equilibrium State and Phase Transition

A. Kuriyama, João da Providência, Y. Tsue +1 more

We study the thermal effect with the use of Lipkin model. We define the density and entropy operator associated with the mixed state representation of Lipkin model, which has been developed with the aid of auxiliary fermion field. We investigate the thermal equilibrium state and its phase transition. In super phase, the thermal effect breaks the particle-hole pairs with coupled angular momentum 0 and does not lift up nucleons from the lower level to upper one, contrary to the case of normal phase.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 1995•1 citation
We consider the notion of thermal equilibrium for an individual closed macroscopic quantum system in a pure state, i.e., described by a wave function. The macroscopic properties in thermal equilibrium of such a system, determined by its wave function, must be the same as those obtained from thermodynamics, e.g., spatial uniformity of temperature and chemical potential. When this is true we say that the system is in macroscopic thermal equilibrium (MATE). Such a system may, however, not be in microscopic thermal equilibrium (MITE). The latter requires that the reduced density matrices of small subsystems be close to those obtained from the microcanonical, equivalently the canonical, ensemble for the whole system. The distinction between MITE and MATE is particularly relevant for systems with many-body localization for which the energy eigenfuctions fail to be in MITE while necessarily most of them, but not all, are in MATE. We note, however, that for generic macroscopic systems, including those with MBL, most wave functions in an energy shell are in both MATE and MITE. For a classical macroscopic system, MATE holds for most phase points on the energy surface, but MITE fails to hold for any phase point.
We study the thermal effect with the use of Lipkin model. We define the density and entropy operator associated with the mixed state representation of Lipkin model, which has been developed with the aid of auxiliary fermion field. We investigate the thermal equilibrium state and its phase transition. In super phase, the thermal effect breaks the particle-hole pairs with coupled angular momentum 0 and does not lift up nucleons from the lower level to upper one, contrary to the case of normal phase.