Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

C&EN Global Enterprise

Zapata Computing

Sam Lemonick

Published Nov 16, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

When computational chemist Alán Aspuru-Guzik told his business partner Christopher Savoie that he had an idea for a quantum computing software company, Savoie was skeptical, he admits. This was 2017, and quantum computing was (and arguably still is) in its infancy. Savoie asked Aspuru-Guzik what a state-of-the-art quantum computer could do. Not much more than a pocket calculator, Aspuru-Guzik told him. But the two had worked together successfully at Kyulux on machine-learning methods to advance organic light-emitting diode technology, so Savoie visited Aspuru-Guzik’s lab, then at Harvard University. By the time they’d finished lunch, Savoie says, he was convinced that Aspuru-Guzik and his collaborators—Yudong Cao, Peter Johnson, Jonathan P. Olson, and Jhonathan Romero Fontalvo—were on to something. By the afternoon, Aspuru-Guzik was calling quantum computing researchers to introduce Savoie as the new CEO of Zapata Computing. Quantum computing proponents have made huge promises, especially in chemistry. A traditional computer represents

DOI
10.1021/cen-09844-cover11

Related papers

Preparing for the Quantum Future: Perspectives of an Entrepreneurial Innovator

Rafael Sotelo, Terrill L. Frantz

Commercial use of quantum computing technology is in our future, and the CEO of one quantum technology company is positioning his company to deliver a first-mover advantage for enterprises. However, the focus is on satisfying customers today, so he is—without pause—preparing customers to leverage the most advanced quantum technology today and into the future. Christopher Savoie, a serial entrepreneur and a founder of Zapata Computing, recently discussed his views on innovation processes, forming companies around emergent technologies, and how he is building a business within the nascent quantum computing industry.

IEEE Engineering Management Review•Aug 5, 2022•5 citations

Quantum information is exciting and important

Charles Day

For the March–April 2007 issue of Computing in Science & Engineering, I wrote an essay entitled “Quantum Computing Is Exciting and Important—Really!” The essay’s inspiration came from a sardonic disclaimer that Rolf Landauer (1927–99) proposed be added to papers about quantum computing: This proposal, like all proposals for quantum computation, relies on speculative technology, does not in current form take into account all possible sources of noise, unreliability and manufacturing error, and probably will not work. Fourteen years ago I argued that even if Landauer’s skepticism remained valid, the quest to build a quantum computer had already paid off. As supporting evidence, I cited the work of David Wineland and his collaborators at the NIST lab in Boulder, Colorado. Having developed logic gates based on trapped ions, they repurposed the technology to make new, entanglement-based clocks of unprecedented precision (see Physics Today, October 2005, page 24).I also cited the work of Princeton University’s Jason Petta. In developing quantum dots as a platform for quantum computing, he and his collaborators at Harvard University measured the puny fluctuating magnetic field of 106 gallium and arsenic nuclei inside a quantum dot (see Physics Today, March 2006, page 16).Theorists were just as productive, I noted. The work of Caltech’s Alexei Kitaev and others on topological quantum computation has spawned rich and fruitful explorations of the mathematical similarities of field theory, knots, and the fractional quantum Hall effect (see Physics Today, October 2005, page 21). Princeton’s Robert Calderbank applied the theory of quantum error correction to understand radar polarimetry.Physicists continue to advance the field of quantum information. Perhaps the most spectacular recent feat is that of Jian-Wei Pan of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) and his collaborators. In 2017 their experiment aboard the satellite Micius beamed down pairs of entangled photons to the Chinese cities of Delingha and Lijiang, which are 1200 km apart. “Never has the spooky action of quantum mechanics been observed at so great a distance,” wrote Ashley Smart in his news story (Physics Today, August 2017, page 14).This past summer, the team known as Google AI Quantum and collaborators reported the use of a quantum processor in combination with a classical computer to calculate the binding energy of chains of 6, 8, 10, and 12 atoms of hydrogen and the cis–trans isomerization energy of a diazene molecule, HNNH.The Google team’s calculations are not beyond the abilities of a classical computer. However, in October 2019 the Google team published a report in Nature that described achieving so-called quantum supremacy: Its 53-qubit device made of Josephson junctions took 200 seconds to solve a sampling problem that would take a classical system 104 years. This past December, USTC’s Pan and his collaborators reported a similar feat in Science: Their 76-qubit device based on entangled photons solved a sampling problem 1014 times faster than a classical device could.If Landauer were alive today, would he concede that a quantum computer probably will work? That’s hard to say. The sampling problems tackled by the Google and USTC teams were expressly devised as benchmarks of quantum supremacy. They fall short of a universal quantum computer capable of, say, proving that the Hubbard model is sufficient to account for high-Tc superconductivity or the particles that result when protons and antiprotons collide at 14 TeV in an upgraded LHC.Despite his skepticism about quantum computing, Landauer was a pioneer in investigating the quantum limits of information. One of his most cited papers is his 1961 derivation of the minimum about heat that is dissipated when one bit of information is erased: kT log 2. Section:ChooseTop of page <<© 2021 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Mar 1, 2021•2 citations

Chemistry is quantum computing’s killer app

Katherine Bourzac

In an IBM lab in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., a circuit board sits at the bottom of a large tub cooled to temperatures colder than those of outer space. Shiny, solderlike zigzags of niobium cover the board, connecting 16 unusual computing elements. These elements, called quantum bits, or qubits, may form the basis of future computers that will solve problems by taking advantage of quantum mechanics. So far, quantum computers like IBM’s 16-qubit system can solve only simple problems, all of them easy enough to be handled by traditional computers. This spring, IBM set a quantum-computing record by modeling beryllium hydride—which contains a mere three atoms (Nature 2017, DOI: 10.1038/nature23879). Earlier prototypes modeled hydrogen and factored the number 15. As quantum computers become more sophisticated, they will allow chemists to solve problems that are intractable on today’s desktops and even supercomputers. In fact, physicists expect that chemistry simulations will be quantum

C&EN Global Enterprise•Oct 30, 2017•8 citations

Alán Aspuru-Guzik

special to C EN Bec Roldan

Alán Aspuru-Guzik’s nearly 2 decades of research can’t be narrowed down to a single scientific field. But the flurry of ideas coming from his lab fits, if precariously, under a grander theme: expansion. “I’m very interested in exploring life,” he says. “When there are opportunities that expand my horizon, I will take them.” For Aspuru-Guzik, a professor of chemistry and computer science at the University of Toronto, the possibilities of the unknown are what have driven his laboratory to the interfaces of quantum computing, machine learning, and chemistry. Aspuru-Guzik blurs the lines between everything: theoretical and experimental chemistry, art and science, and creativity and stiffness. “For Alán, disciplines are artificial,” says Joel Yuen-Zhou, who received his PhD from Aspuru- Guzik’s lab in 2012 and now serves as an associate professor of chemistry at the University of California San Diego. Aspuru-Guzik’s interests span art, literature, music, and science, which made him

C&EN Global Enterprise•Sep 23, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Computing Resource Estimate of Molecular Energy Simulation

James Daniel Whitfield, Jacob Biamonte, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik

Over the last century, ingenious physical and mathematical insights paired with rapidly advancing technology have allowed the field of quantum chemistry to advance dramatically. However, efficient methods for the exact simulation of quantum systems on classical computers do not exist. The present paper reports an extension of one of the authors’ previous work [Aspuru-Guzik et al., Science 309 p. 1704, (2005)] where it was shown that the chemical Hamiltonian can be efficiently simulated using a quantum computer. In particular, we report in detail how a set of molecular integrals can be used to create a quantum circuit that allows the energy of a molecular system with fixed nuclear geometry to be extracted using the phase estimation algorithm proposed by Abrams and Lloyd [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 p. 5165, (1999)]. We extend several known results related to this idea and present numerical examples of the state preparation procedure required in the algorithm. With future quantum devices in mind, we provide a complete example using the Hydrogen molecule, of how a chemical Hamiltonian can be simulated using a quantum computer. Some of the results we present here represent an extension of our recent collaboration appearing in B. P. Lanyon et al. [Nature Chem., advance online publication, doi: 10.1038/nchem.483 (2010)].

•Jan 21, 2010•4 citations

Work with what you’ve got

Boaz Barak

Quantum computing combines great promise with daunting challenges — the road to devices that solve real-world problems is still long. Now, an implementation of a quantum algorithm maps the problems we want to solve to the devices we already have.

Nature Physics•Feb 4, 2021•0 citations
When computational chemist Alán Aspuru-Guzik told his business partner Christopher Savoie that he had an idea for a quantum computing software company, Savoie was skeptical, he admits. This was 2017, and quantum computing was (and arguably still is) in its infancy. Savoie asked Aspuru-Guzik what a state-of-the-art quantum computer could do. Not much more than a pocket calculator, Aspuru-Guzik told him. But the two had worked together successfully at Kyulux on machine-learning methods to advance organic light-emitting diode technology, so Savoie visited Aspuru-Guzik’s lab, then at Harvard University. By the time they’d finished lunch, Savoie says, he was convinced that Aspuru-Guzik and his collaborators—Yudong Cao, Peter Johnson, Jonathan P. Olson, and Jhonathan Romero Fontalvo—were on to something. By the afternoon, Aspuru-Guzik was calling quantum computing researchers to introduce Savoie as the new CEO of Zapata Computing. Quantum computing proponents have made huge promises, especially in chemistry. A traditional computer represents
Commercial use of quantum computing technology is in our future, and the CEO of one quantum technology company is positioning his company to deliver a first-mover advantage for enterprises. However, the focus is on satisfying customers today, so he is—without pause—preparing customers to leverage the most advanced quantum technology today and into the future. Christopher Savoie, a serial entrepreneur and a founder of Zapata Computing, recently discussed his views on innovation processes, forming companies around emergent technologies, and how he is building a business within the nascent quantum computing industry.
For the March–April 2007 issue of Computing in Science & Engineering, I wrote an essay entitled “Quantum Computing Is Exciting and Important—Really!” The essay’s inspiration came from a sardonic disclaimer that Rolf Landauer (1927–99) proposed be added to papers about quantum computing: This proposal, like all proposals for quantum computation, relies on speculative technology, does not in current form take into account all possible sources of noise, unreliability and manufacturing error, and probably will not work. Fourteen years ago I argued that even if Landauer’s skepticism remained valid, the quest to build a quantum computer had already paid off. As supporting evidence, I cited the work of David Wineland and his collaborators at the NIST lab in Boulder, Colorado. Having developed logic gates based on trapped ions, they repurposed the technology to make new, entanglement-based clocks of unprecedented precision (see Physics Today, October 2005, page 24).I also cited the work of Princeton University’s Jason Petta. In developing quantum dots as a platform for quantum computing, he and his collaborators at Harvard University measured the puny fluctuating magnetic field of 106 gallium and arsenic nuclei inside a quantum dot (see Physics Today, March 2006, page 16).Theorists were just as productive, I noted. The work of Caltech’s Alexei Kitaev and others on topological quantum computation has spawned rich and fruitful explorations of the mathematical similarities of field theory, knots, and the fractional quantum Hall effect (see Physics Today, October 2005, page 21). Princeton’s Robert Calderbank applied the theory of quantum error correction to understand radar polarimetry.Physicists continue to advance the field of quantum information. Perhaps the most spectacular recent feat is that of Jian-Wei Pan of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) and his collaborators. In 2017 their experiment aboard the satellite Micius beamed down pairs of entangled photons to the Chinese cities of Delingha and Lijiang, which are 1200 km apart. “Never has the spooky action of quantum mechanics been observed at so great a distance,” wrote Ashley Smart in his news story (Physics Today, August 2017, page 14).This past summer, the team known as Google AI Quantum and collaborators reported the use of a quantum processor in combination with a classical computer to calculate the binding energy of chains of 6, 8, 10, and 12 atoms of hydrogen and the cis–trans isomerization energy of a diazene molecule, HNNH.The Google team’s calculations are not beyond the abilities of a classical computer. However, in October 2019 the Google team published a report in Nature that described achieving so-called quantum supremacy: Its 53-qubit device made of Josephson junctions took 200 seconds to solve a sampling problem that would take a classical system 104 years. This past December, USTC’s Pan and his collaborators reported a similar feat in Science: Their 76-qubit device based on entangled photons solved a sampling problem 1014 times faster than a classical device could.If Landauer were alive today, would he concede that a quantum computer probably will work? That’s hard to say. The sampling problems tackled by the Google and USTC teams were expressly devised as benchmarks of quantum supremacy. They fall short of a universal quantum computer capable of, say, proving that the Hubbard model is sufficient to account for high-Tc superconductivity or the particles that result when protons and antiprotons collide at 14 TeV in an upgraded LHC.Despite his skepticism about quantum computing, Landauer was a pioneer in investigating the quantum limits of information. One of his most cited papers is his 1961 derivation of the minimum about heat that is dissipated when one bit of information is erased: kT log 2. Section:ChooseTop of page <<© 2021 American Institute of Physics.
In an IBM lab in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., a circuit board sits at the bottom of a large tub cooled to temperatures colder than those of outer space. Shiny, solderlike zigzags of niobium cover the board, connecting 16 unusual computing elements. These elements, called quantum bits, or qubits, may form the basis of future computers that will solve problems by taking advantage of quantum mechanics. So far, quantum computers like IBM’s 16-qubit system can solve only simple problems, all of them easy enough to be handled by traditional computers. This spring, IBM set a quantum-computing record by modeling beryllium hydride—which contains a mere three atoms (Nature 2017, DOI: 10.1038/nature23879). Earlier prototypes modeled hydrogen and factored the number 15. As quantum computers become more sophisticated, they will allow chemists to solve problems that are intractable on today’s desktops and even supercomputers. In fact, physicists expect that chemistry simulations will be quantum
Alán Aspuru-Guzik’s nearly 2 decades of research can’t be narrowed down to a single scientific field. But the flurry of ideas coming from his lab fits, if precariously, under a grander theme: expansion. “I’m very interested in exploring life,” he says. “When there are opportunities that expand my horizon, I will take them.” For Aspuru-Guzik, a professor of chemistry and computer science at the University of Toronto, the possibilities of the unknown are what have driven his laboratory to the interfaces of quantum computing, machine learning, and chemistry. Aspuru-Guzik blurs the lines between everything: theoretical and experimental chemistry, art and science, and creativity and stiffness. “For Alán, disciplines are artificial,” says Joel Yuen-Zhou, who received his PhD from Aspuru- Guzik’s lab in 2012 and now serves as an associate professor of chemistry at the University of California San Diego. Aspuru-Guzik’s interests span art, literature, music, and science, which made him
Over the last century, ingenious physical and mathematical insights paired with rapidly advancing technology have allowed the field of quantum chemistry to advance dramatically. However, efficient methods for the exact simulation of quantum systems on classical computers do not exist. The present paper reports an extension of one of the authors’ previous work [Aspuru-Guzik et al., Science 309 p. 1704, (2005)] where it was shown that the chemical Hamiltonian can be efficiently simulated using a quantum computer. In particular, we report in detail how a set of molecular integrals can be used to create a quantum circuit that allows the energy of a molecular system with fixed nuclear geometry to be extracted using the phase estimation algorithm proposed by Abrams and Lloyd [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 p. 5165, (1999)]. We extend several known results related to this idea and present numerical examples of the state preparation procedure required in the algorithm. With future quantum devices in mind, we provide a complete example using the Hydrogen molecule, of how a chemical Hamiltonian can be simulated using a quantum computer. Some of the results we present here represent an extension of our recent collaboration appearing in B. P. Lanyon et al. [Nature Chem., advance online publication, doi: 10.1038/nchem.483 (2010)].