Abstract The concept of angular momentum in quantum mechanics has many counterintuitive aspects, such as assuming only certain discrete values and only certain orientations in space in the presence of external fields. Spin is more esoteric yet; it is hard to imagine how point‐particles with no spatial extent can have an intrinsic angular momentum. Nevertheless, spin is the most fundamental concept in magnetic resonance. Appreciation of the spin concept requires some understanding of the relativistic quantum mechanics developed by P. A. M. Dirac. The history of the evolution of the spin concept is traced—from the turn‐of‐the‐century observation of the Zeeman effect, through the old and new quantum mechanics, and on to Dirac's theory of the electron, which was published in the late 1920s. The special relativity theory is discussed, and there is a brief explanation of how spin emerges naturally in a relativistically correct formulation of quantum mechanics.
Abstract The concept of angular momentum in quantum mechanics has many counterintuitive aspects, such as assuming only certain discrete values and only certain orientations in space in the presence of external fields. Spin is more esoteric yet; it is hard to imagine how point‐particles with no spatial extent can have an intrinsic angular momentum. Nevertheless, spin is the most fundamental concept in magnetic resonance. Appreciation of the spin concept requires some understanding of the relativistic quantum mechanics developed by P. A. M. Dirac. The history of the evolution of the spin concept is traced—from the turn‐of‐the‐century observation of the Zeeman effect, through the old and new quantum mechanics, and on to Dirac's theory of the electron, which was published in the late 1920s. The special relativity theory is discussed, and there is a brief explanation of how spin emerges naturally in a relativistically correct formulation of quantum mechanics.
Abstract Conventional methods for teaching spin at a university level generally follow four main approaches. The first introduces spin into the Schrödinger equation artificially, leaving its physical meaning unclear. The second connects spin to the representation of the rotation group, which clarifies its nature but requires knowledge of group theory. The third approach derives from field theory, separating angular momentum into orbital and intrinsic parts, the latter corresponding to spin; however, this cannot be done within quantum mechanics alone. The fourth derives electron spin from Dirac’s 1928 relativistic equation, which, though correct, has led to the misconception that spin is a purely relativistic effect. A detailed analysis of Dirac’s 1928 papers shows that the concept of spin arises from the need to construct an equation linear in both energy and momentum to preserve Born’s probabilistic interpretation. This linearization of the Klein–Gordon equation reveals that spin is conceptually independent of relativity. Historical and pedagogical perspectives can together clarify conceptual difficulties and promote a deeper understanding of fundamental ideas in physics. Drawing on selected passages from Dirac’s original work, the present discussion offers broader conceptual and cultural considerations that introduce the notion of spin with limited mathematical requirements and can be applied independently of the didactic approach adopted.
Most students of science and engineering know that every elementary particle, such as electrons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, etc., has a quantum mechanical property called “spin” which can be measured (perhaps not easily, but at least in principle) and has a quantized value, including zero. The vast majority of these students mentally visualize spin as the angular momentum associated with the elementary particle spinning or rotating about its own axis (like a top or a planetary object). This mental picture, although convenient and comforting, is actually somewhat crude and certainly incomplete. Landau and Lifshitz, in their classic textbook on quantum mechanics [1], wrote “[the spin] property of elementary particles is peculiar to quantum theory. [It] has no classical interpretation... It would be wholly meaningless to imagine the ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum of an elementary particle as being the result of its rotation about its own axis.” The simplistic notion of self-rotation about an axis, shown in Fig. 1.1, can- not explain many features of spin, such as why its magnitude cannot assume continuous values and why it is quantized to certain specific values. It also causes serious problems if taken too literally. As we will see later (Problem 1.2), if we think of an electron as a solid sphere of radius equal to the Lorentz radius e2/(4πǫ0m0c 2) (where e is the electron’s charge, m0 is the mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ǫ0 is the dielectric constant of vacuum), then the velocity on the surface of a rotating electron would have to be many times the velocity of light in vacuum if such a rotation were to generate an angular momentum equal to the electron’s spin. Obviously that would not be permitted by the theory of relativity. Indeed, a deep understanding of quantum mechanics is required to understand how the spin property comes about. Its origin is in relativistic quantum mechanics and really was first appreciated by Paul Andrew Maurice Dirac when he derived the Dirac equation which is the cornerstone of relativistic quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman, noted for his distaste for mysticism in physics, wrote about the notion of “spin”: “It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is down deep in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Spin is well known to be an intrinsically relativistic property of particles. Nonetheless its effects are seen in many physical situations which are not obviously relativistic, perhaps the most obvious examples being magnets and the quantum mechanically permitted electronic configurations of the elements in the periodic table. The view of spin adopted in these and other problems is that the electron has a quantized spin ( s = 1/2) and that is a fundamental tenet of the theory, rather than something that has to be explained. In this chapter we are going to discuss the behaviour of spin-1/2 particles (electrons, protons and neutrons for example) without much direct reference to relativistic quantum theory and the origins of spin. This chapter should be instructive in its own right and as a guide to understanding spin when we come to discuss it in a fully relativistic context at various stages throughout this book. Unless otherwise specified, we will refer to electrons, but it should be borne in mind that the theory is equally applicable to any spin-1/2 particle. Students of quantum theory cannot delve very deeply into the subject without coming across the quantization of angular momentum. The orbital angular momentum usually surfaces in the theory leading up to the quantum description of the hydrogen atom.
In the introductory remarks to Chapter 5 mention was made of the 1925 proposal of Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit that to an electron there should be assigned an intrinsic angular momentum or spin S = (S x , S y , S z )—this in addition to its quantum angular momentum (or orbital angular momentum) M = (M x , M y , M z ) defined in (5.4.4). This is not to be taken to mean that an electron actually spins about an axis in some physical way. Experiments (in particular the noted Stern-Gerlach experiment) have provided adequate justification for the proposed concept of spin, a proposal also made by R. Bichowsky and H. Urey. Dirac has shown that the notion of spin is necessary if quantum mechanics and Einstein relativity are to be consistent theories. Chemical properties of atoms, and their ability to combine and form molecules, the splitting of spectral lines by a magnetic field applied to an atom (i.e., the Zeeman effect, which we discuss later), all depend on this important notion.
Angular momentum is essential to any advanced discussion of magnetic resonance spectroscopy. A brief history of the modern sub-atomic particle-spin concept is presented. The origin of the spin-1/2 angular momentum quantum number is detailed and angular momentum operators are constructed for spin-1/2 nuclei using the postulates of quantum mechanics that are then used to produce a set of very useful eigenvalue formulas. Angular momentum operators in spherical coordinate form are developed and operator matrices are constructed from Cartesian operators. The time-evolution of these operators is of much interest in later chapters and is explored in some detail here.
Angular momentum is essential to any advanced discussion of magnetic resonance spectroscopy. A brief history of the modern sub-atomic particle-spin concept is presented. The origin of the spin-1/2 angular momentum quantum number is detailed and angular momentum operators are constructed for spin-1/2 nuclei using the postulates of quantum mechanics which are then used to produce a set of very useful eigenvalue formulas. Angular momentum operators in spherical coordinate form are developed and operator matrices are constructed from Cartesian operators. The time-evolution of these operators is of much interest in later chapters and is explored in some detail here.