TYPICAL-MEDIUM THEORY OF MOTT–ANDERSON LOCALIZATION

Abstract

The Mott and the Anderson routes to localization have long been recognized as the two basic processes that can drive the metal-insulator transition (MIT).Theories separately describing each of these mechanisms were discussed long ago, but an accepted approach that can include both has remained elusive.The lack of any obvious static symmetry distinguishing the metal from the insulator poses another fundamental problem, since an appropriate static order parameter cannot be easily found.More recent work, however, has revisited the original arguments of Anderson and Mott, which stressed that the key diference between the metal end the insulator lies in the dynamics of the electron.This physical picture has suggested that the "typical" (geometrically averaged) escape rate τ -1 typ = exp ln τ -1 esc from a given lattice site should be regarded as the proper dynamical order parameter for the MIT, one that can naturally describe both the Anderson and the Mott mechanism for localization.This article provides an overview of the recent results obtained from the corresponding Typical-Medium Theory, which provided new insight into the the two-fluid character of the Mott-Anderson transition. I. FROM METAL TO INSULATOR: A NEW PERSPECTIVETo understand many, if not most exotic new materials, one has to tackle the difficult problem of understanding the metal-insulator quantum phase transition, as driven by the combined effects of strong electronic correlations and disorder.Traditional approaches to the problem, which emerged in the early 1980s, have focused on examining the perturbative effects of disorder within the Fermi liquid framework.Despite their mathematical elegance, these theories, unfortunately, prove ill-suited to describe several key physical processes, such as tendency to local magnetic moment formation and the approach to the Mott insulating state.In addition, such weak-coupling theories cannot easily describe strongly inhomogeneous phases, with behavior often dominated by broad distributions and rare disorder configurations.This new insight, which is largely driven by experimental advances, seems to suggest that an alternative theoretical picture may provide a better starting point.In this article we describe recent advances based on a new theoretical method, which offers a complementary perspective to the conventional weak-coupling theories.By revisiting the original ides of Anderson and Mott, it examines the typical escape rate from a given site as the fundamental dynamical order parameter to distinguish between a metal and an insulator.This article describes the corresponding Typical-Medium Theory (TMT) and discusses some of its recent results and potential applications.We fist discuss discuss, in some detail, several experimental and theoretical clues suggesting that a new theoretical paradigm is needed.The formulation of TMT for Anderson localization of noninteracting electrons is then discussed, with emphasis on available analytical results.Finally, we review recent progress in applying TMT to the Mott-Anderson transition for disordered Hubbard models, and discuss resulting the two-fluid behavior at the critical point. II. THEORETICAL CHALLENGES: BEYOND CINDERELLA'S SLIPPER?The existence of a sharp metal-insulator transition at T = 0 has been appreciated for many years [1].Experiments on many systems indeed have demonstrated that a well defined critical carrier concentration can easily be identified.On the theoretical side, ambiguities on how to describe or even think of the metal-insulator transition have made it difficult to directly address the nature of the critical region.In practice, one often employs the theoretical tools that are available, even if possibly inappropriate.Even worse, one often focuses on those systems and phenomena that fit an available theoretical mold, ignoring and brushing aside precisely those features that seem difficult to understand.This "Cinderella's slipper" approach is exactly what one should not do; unfortunately it happens all too often.A cure is, of course, given by soberly confronting the experimental reality: what seems paradoxical at first sight often proves to be the first clue to the solution.A. Traditional approaches to disordered interacting electrons