Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Coulomb Potential

Shi‐Hai Dong

Published Jan 1, 2011• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-1917-0_7

Related papers

Coulomb Potential and Hydrogen-Like Atoms

Stephen P. Martin

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

A quantum particle in a nonstationary Coulomb potential

V. V. Dodonov, Vladimir I. Man’ko, D. L. Osipov

•Jan 1, 1986•0 citations

Coulomb Potentials by Path Integration

Ch. Grosche

The path integral for the potential is evaluated in three different coordinate systems, i. e. in cartesian coordinates, in polar coordinates and in parabolic coordinates. The equivalence between the different approaches is shown and in each case the energyspectrum and the wave functions are explicitly calculated. Furthermore we discuss special cases, including the ring-potential, the Coulomb potential with an Aharonov-Bohm solenoid, and the genuine Coulomb problem. We also point out the separability of the path integral formulation of the ring-potential in spheroidal coordinates, and of the Coulomb potential in spheroidal and spheroconical coordinates, respectively.

Fortschritte der Physik/Progress of Physics•Jan 1, 1992•40 citations

Quantum potential

Eric Hand

Nature•Nov 1, 2009•4 citations

Disproof of a conjecture of D. Muhlerin and I. Zinnes

John D. Dollard

It is shown that the operator U(±)c(t) defined by Muhlerin and Zinnes [J. Math.Phys.11,1402 (1970)] in their account of Coulomb potential scattering theory is not an isometry when the Coulomb potential is weak enough. It is opined that for this reason their account of Coulomb potential scattering theory does not have a straightforward physical interpretation.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1975•4 citations

Coulomb Problem

Springer eBooks•Nov 13, 2005•0 citations
The path integral for the potential is evaluated in three different coordinate systems, i. e. in cartesian coordinates, in polar coordinates and in parabolic coordinates. The equivalence between the different approaches is shown and in each case the energyspectrum and the wave functions are explicitly calculated. Furthermore we discuss special cases, including the ring-potential, the Coulomb potential with an Aharonov-Bohm solenoid, and the genuine Coulomb problem. We also point out the separability of the path integral formulation of the ring-potential in spheroidal coordinates, and of the Coulomb potential in spheroidal and spheroconical coordinates, respectively.