In this essay, we examine the feasibility of quantum computation of Gr\"obner basis which is a fundamental tool of algebraic geometry. The classical method for computing Gr\"obner basis is based on Buchberger's algorithm, and our question is how to adopt quantum algorithm there. A Quantum algorithm for finding the maximum is usable for detecting head terms of polynomials, which are required for the computation of S-polynomials. The reduction of S-polynomials with respect to a Gr\"obner basis could be done by the quantum version of Gauss-Jordan elimination of matrices which represents polynomials. However, the frequent occurrence of zero-reductions of polynomials is an obstacle to the effective application of quantum algorithms. This is because zero-reductions of polynomials occur in non-full-rank matrices, for which quantum linear systems algorithms (through the inversion of matrices) are inadequate, as ever-known quantum linear solvers (such as Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd) require the clandestine computations of the inverses of eigenvalues. Such algorithms should be used in limited situations with the guarantee that the matrices could be inverted. For example, the transformation from the non-reduced Gr\"obner basis to the reduced one is of this sort, and the quantum algorithms surely achieve the partial speedup of the computations.
In this essay, we examine the feasibility of quantum computation of Gr"obner basis which is a fundamental tool of algebraic geometry. The classical method for computing Gr"obner basis is based on Buchberger's algorithm, and our question is how to adopt quantum algorithm there. A Quantum algorithm for finding the maximum is usable for detecting head terms of polynomials, which are required for the computation of S-polynomials. The reduction of S-polynomials with respect to a Gr"obner basis could be done by the quantum version of Gauss-Jordan elimination of matrices which represents polynomials. However, the frequent occurrence of zero-reductions of polynomials is an obstacle to the effective application of quantum algorithms. This is because zero-reductions of polynomials occur in non-full-rank matrices, for which quantum linear systems algorithms (through the inversion of matrices) are inadequate, as ever-known quantum linear solvers (such as Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd) require the clandestine computations of the inverses of eigenvalues. Such algorithms should be used in limited situations with the guarantee that the matrices could be inverted. For example, the transformation from the non-reduced Gr"obner basis to the reduced one is of this sort, and the quantum algorithms surely achieve the partial speedup of the computations.
Our main concern in this article is how to apply quantum algorithms to compute Groebner basis through Faugere's F4 and F5 algorithms, which are regarded as the most effective algorithms for this purpose. We give examples and pseudo-codes for these algorithms and investigate where we can apply quantum algorithms. As a result, we have the designs (or the pseudo-codes) of quantum versions of the F4 and F5 algorithms by replacing classical algorithms with quantum ones. The quantum versions of F4 and F5 algorithms are, in nature, the extensions of the quantum Gaussian-Jordan elimination of Diepp, since the computations of Groebner bases are practicable through the matrix representations. In the computation of Groebner bases, quantum algorithms serve to construct the matrices as small as possible (according to the fundamental idea of F4 and F5) and to find the pivotal element as quickly as possible.
In this paper we present two algorithms for reducing systems of multivariate polynomial equations over the finite field F 2 to the canonical triangular form called lexicographical Gröbner basis. This triangular form is the most appropriate for finding solutions of the system. On the other hand, the system of polynomials over F 2 whose variables also take values in F 2 (Boolean polynomials) completely describes the unitary matrix generated by a quantum circuit. In particular, the matrix itself can be computed by counting the number of solutions (roots) of the associated polynomial system. Thereby, efficient construction of the lexicographical Gröbner bases over F 2 associated with quantum circuits gives a method for computing their circuit matrices that is alternative to the direct numerical method based on linear algebra. We compare our implementation of both algorithms with some other software packages available for computing Gröbner bases over F 2.
We propose a hybrid quantum-classical implementation of the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm for the matrix inversion (linear-systems) problem, a key subroutine in quantum computing. Rather than claiming a new complexity result, we provide an assumption-explicit proof sketch, aligned with established literature, that contextualizes matrix inversion as Bounded-Error Quantum Polynomial Time (BQP)-complete and offers reduction-based intuition via Grover-type amplitude amplification. We implement HHL for 2 × 2, 4 × 4, and 8 × 8 Hermitian matrices using Qiskit and evaluate performance using simulator-based experiments with calibrated noise models and executions on IBM Quantum and IonQ backends. To enhance robustness on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware, we integrate measurement-error mitigation, zero-noise extrapolation, and post-selection, and we quantify performance using fidelity and mean squared error. Results from noiseless simulation, calibrated-noise simulation, and real-device execution show that mitigation improves reconstruction fidelity for small Hermitian systems, particularly for deeper circuits. These findings support mitigation-aware feasibility on current NISQ devices; however, they do not establish present-day runtime advantage over optimized classical solvers. The proposed workflow is relevant to quantum optimization, quantum machine learning, and quantum chemistry, where linear-system primitives arise frequently. Future work will focus on reducing phase-estimation depth (e.g., iterative or semiclassical variants), improving compilation and benchmarking transparency, and re-evaluating larger instances on higher-fidelity hardware.
There has been significant progress in the development of quantum algorithms for solving linear systems of equations with a growing body of applications to Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and CFD-like problems. This work extends previous work by developing a non-linear hybrid quantum-classical CFD solver and using it to generate fully converged solutions. The hybrid solver uses the SIMPLE CFD algorithm, which is common in many industrial CFD codes, and applies it to the 2-dimensional lid driven cavity test case. A theme of this work is the classical processing time needed to prepare the quantum circuit with a focus on the decomposition of the CFD matrix into a linear combination of unitaries (LCU). CFD meshes with up to 65x65 nodes are considered with the largest producing a LCU containing 32,767 Pauli strings. A new method for rapidly re-computing the coefficients in a LCU is proposed, although this reduces, rather than eliminates, the classical scaling issues. The quantum linear equation solver uses the Harrow, Hassidim, Lloyd (HHL) algorithm via a state-vector emulator. Test matrices are sampled from the classical CFD solver to investigate the solution accuracy that can be achieved with HHL. For the smallest 5x5 and 9x9 CFD meshes, full non-linear hybrid CFD calculations are performed. The impacts of approximating the LCU and the varying the number of ancilla rotations in the eigenvalue inversion circuit are studied. Preliminary timing results indicate that the classical computer preparation time needed for a hybrid solver is just as important to the achievement of quantum advantage in CFD as the time on the quantum computer. The reported HHL solutions and LCU decompositions provide a benchmark for future research. The CFD test matrices used in this study are available upon request.
This expository paper reviews some of the recent uses of computational algebraic geometry in classical and quantum optimization. The paper assumes an elementary background in algebraic geometry and adiabatic quantum computing (AQC), and concentrates on presenting concrete examples (with Python codes tested on a quantum computer) of applying algebraic geometry constructs: solving binary optimization, factoring, and compiling. Reversing the direction, we also briefly describe a novel use of quantum computers to compute Groebner bases for toric ideals. We also show how Groebner bases play a role in studying AQC at a fundamental level within a Morse theory framework. We close by placing our work in perspective, by situating this leg of the journey, as part of a marvelous intellectual expedition that began with our ancients over 4000 years ago.
Abstract In a sense, gate-based quantum computers are just machines that apply (extremely) large matrices to input states (vectors), and so it is natural to ask whether linear algebra applications can benefit from quantum computing. In the case of solving linear systems, this question has been answered with an emphatic ‘yes’. In 2009, Aram Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, and Seth Lloyd proposed a quantum algorithm to solve linear systems exponentially faster than the best classical counterpart. The quantum linear systems solver is ubiquitously known by the initials of its inventors, ‘HHL’. As well as detailing HHL, this chapter also explores some of the quantum machine learning applications that have been proposed based on HHL along with results showing that these algorithms are often ‘dequantised’ in the problem space of interest – i.e., there exists an efficient classical ‘quantum-inspired’ algorithm.