Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Time Evolution of Quantum Systems

Luciano Maiani, Omar Benhar

Published Nov 18, 2015• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In general, the expectation values of observable quantities depend on time. In quantum mechanics, these values are given by the expression: < X >t=< A(t)|X(t)|A(t) >. (10.1) There is an intrinsic ambiguity in determining the time dependence on the various elements (bra, ket and operator) which comprise the right hand side of equation (10.1) because we can transfer this dependence from one element to another, while keeping unchanged the expectation value < X >t, which is all we can measure on the system. The ambiguity gives rise to different descriptions of the motion, connected to unitary time-dependent transformations, thus equivalent to each other. In the following sections, we describe the Schro¨dinger and Heisenberg representations. Subsequently we will introduce a third description of the motion or interactions: the Dirac representation, also called the interaction representation, which is particularly useful in the case of weakly interacting systems.

DOI
10.1201/b19021-15

Related papers

Quantum Dynamics and Pictures

Z. Ficek

This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.

•Mar 3, 2017•0 citations

Quantum Dynamics

Uri Peskin

Explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonians are ubiquitous in applications of quantum theory. It is therefore necessary to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation directly. The system’s dynamics is associated with a unitary time-evolution operator (a propagator), formally given as an infinite Dyson series. Time-dependent observables are invariant under unitary time-dependent transformations, where it is sometimes useful to transform the time-evolution from the states into the corresponding operators. This is carried out in part (in full) by transforming to the interaction (Heisenberg) picture. The corresponding equations of motion for the time-dependent operators are introduced. For quadratic potential energy functions, the time evolution of quantum expectation values coincides with the corresponding classical dynamics. This is demonstrated and analyzed in detail for Gaussian wave packets and a coherent state. Finally, we derive exact and approximate expressions for time-dependent transition probabilities and transition rates between quantum states. The validity of time-dependent perturbation theory is analyzed by comparison to exact dynamics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 11, 2023•0 citations

Alternative Formulations

Bernard d’Espagnat

The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

The Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract The second chapter introduces the notion of wave functions and their equation of motion proposed by Erwin Schrödinger. The interpretation and normalization of the wave function are discussed, leading to the continuity equation. The chapter also introduces basic mathematical operations that can be carried out for wave functions and operators, describing e.g., how to calculate scalar products and commutators, as well as expectation values and variances of observables. With these tools at hand, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is re-examined, focusing on the example of a Gaussian wave packet, which is studied both in position space and momentum space. We also discuss the time evolution of general states and of the exemplary wave packet. Finally, we will see how classical physics is recovered as a limiting case of the quantum-mechanical description

•Sep 7, 2023•0 citations

Time evolution of quantum systems

Dževad Belkić

In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 15, 2020•0 citations

Time Evolution

Gary E. Bowman

The time-dependent Schrödinger equation forms the chapter's starting point. For a time-independent Hamiltonian, a quantum state may be time evolved with the standard, unitary time evolution operator. After obtaining this operator, an algorithm is provided by which a state may be time evolved, and measurement probabilities determined. A spin 1/2 example illustrates time evolution concretely. All this makes close contact with the discussion of unitary operators in Chapter 10. The time dependence of expectation values forms the next topic, followed by the concept of a constant of the motion, which is carefully contrasted with that of a stationary state. The energy-time uncertainty relations, which rest on a quite different conceptual footing than the ‘standard’ uncertainty relations, occupy the rest of the chapter. An example from spin 1/2 illustrates the energy-time uncertainty relations.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Nov 1, 2007•0 citations
In general, the expectation values of observable quantities depend on time. In quantum mechanics, these values are given by the expression: < X >t=< A(t)|X(t)|A(t) >. (10.1) There is an intrinsic ambiguity in determining the time dependence on the various elements (bra, ket and operator) which comprise the right hand side of equation (10.1) because we can transfer this dependence from one element to another, while keeping unchanged the expectation value < X >t, which is all we can measure on the system. The ambiguity gives rise to different descriptions of the motion, connected to unitary time-dependent transformations, thus equivalent to each other. In the following sections, we describe the Schro¨dinger and Heisenberg representations. Subsequently we will introduce a third description of the motion or interactions: the Dirac representation, also called the interaction representation, which is particularly useful in the case of weakly interacting systems.
This chapter demonstrates how one can find the time evolution of the operators from the knowledge of the time evolution of the state vector, and vice versa. It introduces a unitary operator and discusses the concept of a unitary transformation to show how one could transfer the time dependence from the state vectors to the operators. The possibility that either the state vectors or the operators can depend explicitly on time will lead to introduce the Schrodinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures. The chapter discusses the fundamental differences between these pictures. It also discusses the Ehrenfest theorem, which shows under which conditions quantum mechanics predicts the same results for measured physical quantities as classical physics. It illustrates unitary transformations of an arbitrary operator Â(t) which can depend explicitly on time. Quantum mechanics produces the same result as classical mechanics for a system in which particles are represented by well-localized wave functions.
Explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonians are ubiquitous in applications of quantum theory. It is therefore necessary to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation directly. The system’s dynamics is associated with a unitary time-evolution operator (a propagator), formally given as an infinite Dyson series. Time-dependent observables are invariant under unitary time-dependent transformations, where it is sometimes useful to transform the time-evolution from the states into the corresponding operators. This is carried out in part (in full) by transforming to the interaction (Heisenberg) picture. The corresponding equations of motion for the time-dependent operators are introduced. For quadratic potential energy functions, the time evolution of quantum expectation values coincides with the corresponding classical dynamics. This is demonstrated and analyzed in detail for Gaussian wave packets and a coherent state. Finally, we derive exact and approximate expressions for time-dependent transition probabilities and transition rates between quantum states. The validity of time-dependent perturbation theory is analyzed by comparison to exact dynamics.
The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.
Abstract The second chapter introduces the notion of wave functions and their equation of motion proposed by Erwin Schrödinger. The interpretation and normalization of the wave function are discussed, leading to the continuity equation. The chapter also introduces basic mathematical operations that can be carried out for wave functions and operators, describing e.g., how to calculate scalar products and commutators, as well as expectation values and variances of observables. With these tools at hand, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is re-examined, focusing on the example of a Gaussian wave packet, which is studied both in position space and momentum space. We also discuss the time evolution of general states and of the exemplary wave packet. Finally, we will see how classical physics is recovered as a limiting case of the quantum-mechanical description
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.
The time-dependent Schrödinger equation forms the chapter's starting point. For a time-independent Hamiltonian, a quantum state may be time evolved with the standard, unitary time evolution operator. After obtaining this operator, an algorithm is provided by which a state may be time evolved, and measurement probabilities determined. A spin 1/2 example illustrates time evolution concretely. All this makes close contact with the discussion of unitary operators in Chapter 10. The time dependence of expectation values forms the next topic, followed by the concept of a constant of the motion, which is carefully contrasted with that of a stationary state. The energy-time uncertainty relations, which rest on a quite different conceptual footing than the ‘standard’ uncertainty relations, occupy the rest of the chapter. An example from spin 1/2 illustrates the energy-time uncertainty relations.