Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Quantum Universe

Vladimir G. Ivancevic, Tijana T. Ivancevic

Published Oct 1, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812819284_0004

Related papers

Quantum Universe

Viatcheslav Mukhanov

Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk•Sep 28, 2016•4 citations

Fundamentals of universality in one-way quantum computation

M Van den Nest, Wolfgang Dür, A Miyake +1 more

In this paper, we build a framework allowing for a systematic investigation of the fundamental issue: ' Which quantum states serve as universal resources for measurement-based (one-way) quantum computation? ' We start our study by re-examining what is exactly meant by 'universality' in quantum computation, and what the implications are for universal one-way quantum computation. Given the framework of a measurement-based quantum computer, where quantum information is processed by local operations only, we find that the most general universal one-way quantum computer is one which is capable of accepting arbitrary classical inputs and producing arbitrary quantum outputs—we refer to this property as CQ-universality. We then show that a systematic study of CQ-universality in one-way quantum computation is possible by identifying entanglement features that are required to be present in every universal resource. In particular, we find that a large class of entanglement measures must reach its supremum on every universal resource. These insights are used to identify several families of states as being not universal, such as one-dimensional (1D) cluster states, Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states, W states, and ground states of non-critical 1D spin systems. Our criteria are strengthened by considering the efficiency of a quantum computation, and we find that entanglement measures must obey a certain scaling law with the system size for all efficient universal resources. This again leads to examples of non-universal resources, such as, e.g. ground states of critical 1D spin systems. On the other hand, we provide several examples of efficient universal resources, namely graph states corresponding to hexagonal, triangular and Kagome lattices. Finally, we consider the more general notion of encoded CQ-universality, where quantum outputs are allowed to be produced in an encoded form. Again we provide entanglement-based criteria for encoded universality. Moreover, we present a general procedure to construct encoded universal resources.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702116•New Journal of Physics•Jun 29, 2007•97 citations

Quantum Universe

Viatcheslav Mukhanov

Physics-Uspekhi•Sep 28, 2016•5 citations

Quantum Theory of the Universe Based on Bayesian Probability

Matsuo Sato

We formulate a quantum theory of the Universe based on Bayesian probability. In this theory, the probability of the Universe is not a frequency probability, which can be obtained by observing experimental results several times, but is a Bayesian probability, which can define a probability of an event that occurs just once. As an example, by applying the quantum theory of the Universe to an action of a scalar field theory in the four dimensions as a toy model for the theory of the Universe, we explicitly obtain the probability of the Universe and the action of matters in the Universe.

arXiv:1907.13437•Jul 23, 2019•0 citations

Toward a Universal Quantum Computer

Yu Shi

Given the existence of a universal quantum Turing machine, there is no conflict in the definition of a universal quantum computer between being universal and the need for a halt qubit, as previously claimed. It is also pointed out that there exists a universal, i.e. programmable, quantum circuit which can perform an arbitrary quantum computation, by repeating the operation of a fixed gate array.

•Aug 24, 1999•0 citations

The Quantum Universe

J. Ambjoern, A. Goerlich, Jerzy Jurkiewicz +1 more

Acta Physica Polonica B•Dec 1, 2008•7 citations
In this paper, we build a framework allowing for a systematic investigation of the fundamental issue: ' Which quantum states serve as universal resources for measurement-based (one-way) quantum computation? ' We start our study by re-examining what is exactly meant by 'universality' in quantum computation, and what the implications are for universal one-way quantum computation. Given the framework of a measurement-based quantum computer, where quantum information is processed by local operations only, we find that the most general universal one-way quantum computer is one which is capable of accepting arbitrary classical inputs and producing arbitrary quantum outputs—we refer to this property as CQ-universality. We then show that a systematic study of CQ-universality in one-way quantum computation is possible by identifying entanglement features that are required to be present in every universal resource. In particular, we find that a large class of entanglement measures must reach its supremum on every universal resource. These insights are used to identify several families of states as being not universal, such as one-dimensional (1D) cluster states, Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states, W states, and ground states of non-critical 1D spin systems. Our criteria are strengthened by considering the efficiency of a quantum computation, and we find that entanglement measures must obey a certain scaling law with the system size for all efficient universal resources. This again leads to examples of non-universal resources, such as, e.g. ground states of critical 1D spin systems. On the other hand, we provide several examples of efficient universal resources, namely graph states corresponding to hexagonal, triangular and Kagome lattices. Finally, we consider the more general notion of encoded CQ-universality, where quantum outputs are allowed to be produced in an encoded form. Again we provide entanglement-based criteria for encoded universality. Moreover, we present a general procedure to construct encoded universal resources.
We formulate a quantum theory of the Universe based on Bayesian probability. In this theory, the probability of the Universe is not a frequency probability, which can be obtained by observing experimental results several times, but is a Bayesian probability, which can define a probability of an event that occurs just once. As an example, by applying the quantum theory of the Universe to an action of a scalar field theory in the four dimensions as a toy model for the theory of the Universe, we explicitly obtain the probability of the Universe and the action of matters in the Universe.