Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

de Broglie–Bohm, Delayed-Choice, Double-Slit Experiment, and Density Matrix

James S. Bell

Published Aug 1, 2001• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812386540_0013

Related papers

de Broglie–Bohm, Delayed-Choice, Double-Slit Experiment, and Density Matrix

James S. Bell

World Scientific series in 20th century physics•Sep 1, 1995•13 citations

The “Past” and the “Delayed-Choice” Double-Slit Experiment

JOHN ARCHIBALD WHEELER

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1978•417 citations

The Density Matrix in the de Broglie--Bohm Approach

O. J. E. Maroney

arXiv:quant-ph/0311149•Foundations of Physics•Mar 1, 2005•14 citations

De Broglie-Bohm, delayed-choice, double-slit experiment, and density matrix

James S. Bell

The de Broglie-Bohm version of quantum mechanics is applied to the delayed-choice double-slit experiment. The role of the density matrix is considered.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 19, 2009•80 citations

Delayed-Choice Experiments and Bohr's Elementary Quantum Phenomenon

Warner A. Miller, JOHN ARCHIBALD WHEELER

Advanced series in applied physics•Jan 1, 1997•23 citations

de Broglie–Bohm, delayed-choice double-slit experiment, and density matrix

James S. Bell

I will try to interest you in the de Broglie–Bohm version of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. It is, in my opinion, very instructive. It is experimentally equivalent to the usual version insofar as the latter is unambiguous. But it does not require, in its very formulation, a vague division of the world into ‘system’ and ‘apparatus,’ nor of history into ‘measurement’ and ‘nonmeasurement.’ So it applies to the world at large, and not just to idealized laboratory procedures. Indeed the de Broglie–Bohm theory is sharp where the usual one is fuzzy, and general where the usual one is special. This is not a systematic exposition, but only an illustration of the ideas with a particularly nice example, and then some remarks on the role of the density matrix – in tribute to the title of this conference. No one more eloquently than John A. Wheeler has presented the delayed-choice double slit experiment. A pulsed particle source S (see Fig. 1) is so feeble that not more than one particle is emitted per pulse. The associated wave pulse B falls on a screen with slits 1 and 2. The transmitted pulses B′ are focussed by off-centred lenses into intersecting plane wave trains which fall finally on particle counters C 1 and C 2 – unless a photographic plate P is pushed into the region where the two wave trains interpenetrate. The decision, to interpose the plate or not, is made only after the pulse has passed the slits.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 3, 2004•11 citations
I will try to interest you in the de Broglie–Bohm version of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. It is, in my opinion, very instructive. It is experimentally equivalent to the usual version insofar as the latter is unambiguous. But it does not require, in its very formulation, a vague division of the world into ‘system’ and ‘apparatus,’ nor of history into ‘measurement’ and ‘nonmeasurement.’ So it applies to the world at large, and not just to idealized laboratory procedures. Indeed the de Broglie–Bohm theory is sharp where the usual one is fuzzy, and general where the usual one is special. This is not a systematic exposition, but only an illustration of the ideas with a particularly nice example, and then some remarks on the role of the density matrix – in tribute to the title of this conference. No one more eloquently than John A. Wheeler has presented the delayed-choice double slit experiment. A pulsed particle source S (see Fig. 1) is so feeble that not more than one particle is emitted per pulse. The associated wave pulse B falls on a screen with slits 1 and 2. The transmitted pulses B′ are focussed by off-centred lenses into intersecting plane wave trains which fall finally on particle counters C 1 and C 2 – unless a photographic plate P is pushed into the region where the two wave trains interpenetrate. The decision, to interpose the plate or not, is made only after the pulse has passed the slits.