Quantum computing is computationally more powerful than classical one due to the features of superposition and entanglement of quantum bits (qubits). However, because of the non-cloning property, measuring qubits in superposition forces them to collapse onto classical ones, which makes traditional run-time techniques for debugging and analyzing hardware circuits infeasible. To overcome this issue, previous works proposed the concept of quantum dynamic runtime assertion. Stabilizer is an approach adopted for correcting quantum errors. The quantum state can remain unchanged after several Pauli operations. We call these Pauli operations a stabilizer. In this work, we propose to use the quantum stabilizers for dynamic runtime assertions, which requires less quantum gates and increases the detect accuracy on Noisy intermediate scale quantum(NISQ).
Quantum computing is computationally more powerful than classical one due to the features of superposition and entanglement of quantum bits (qubits). However, because of the non-cloning property, measuring qubits in superposition forces them to collapse onto classical ones, which makes traditional run-time techniques for debugging and analyzing hardware circuits infeasible. To overcome this issue, previous works proposed the concept of quantum dynamic runtime assertion. Stabilizer is an approach adopted for correcting quantum errors. The quantum state can remain unchanged after several Pauli operations. We call these Pauli operations a stabilizer. In this work, we propose to use the quantum stabilizers for dynamic runtime assertions, which requires less quantum gates and increases the detect accuracy on Noisy intermediate scale quantum(NISQ).
In this paper, we propose quantum circuits for runtime assertions, which can be used for both software debugging and error detection. Runtime assertion is challenging in quantum computing for two key reasons. First, a quantum bit (qubit) cannot be copied, which is known as the non-cloning theorem. Second, when a qubit is measured, its superposition state collapses into a classical state, losing the inherent parallel information. In this paper, we overcome these challenges with runtime computation through ancilla qubits, which are used to indirectly collect the information of the qubits of interest. We design quantum circuits to assert classical states, entanglement, and superposition states.
In this paper, we propose quantum circuits to enable dynamic assertions for classical values, entanglement, and superposition. This enables a dynamic debugging primitive, driven by a programmer’s understanding of the correct behavior of the quantum program. We show that besides generating assertion errors, the assertion logic may also force the qubits under test to be into the desired state. Besides debugging, our proposed assertion logic can also be used in noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) systems to filter out erroneous results, as demonstrated on a 20-qubit IBM Q quantum computer. Our proposed assertion circuits have been implemented as functions in the open-source Qiskit tool.
In this paper, we propose quantum circuits for runtime assertions, which can be used for both software debugging and error detection. Runtime assertion is challenging in quantum computing for two key reasons. First, a quantum bit (qubit) cannot be copied, which is known as the non-cloning theorem. Second, when a qubit is measured, its superposition state collapses into a classical state, losing the inherent parallel information. In this paper, we overcome these challenges with runtime computation through ancilla qubits, which are used to indirectly collect the information of the qubits of interest. We design quantum circuits to assert classical states, entanglement, and superposition states. Our experimental results show that they are effective in debugging as well as improving the success rate for various quantum algorithms on IBM Q quantum computers.
In this paper, we propose quantum circuits to enable dynamic assertions for classical values, entanglement, and superposition. This enables a dynamic debugging primitive, driven by a programmer’s understanding of the correct behavior of the quantum program. We show that besides generating assertion errors, the assertion logic may also force the qubits under test to be into the desired state. Besides debugging, our proposed assertion logic can also be used in noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) systems to filter out erroneous results, as demonstrated on a 20-qubit IBM Q quantum computer. Our proposed assertion circuits have been implemented as functions in the open-source Qiskit tool.
Functional validation is necessary to detect any errors during quantum computation. There are promising avenues to debug quantum circuits using runtime assertions. However, the existing approaches rely on the expertise of the verification engineers to manually design and insert the assertions in suitable locations. In this paper, we propose automated generation and placement of quantum assertions based on static analysis and random sampling of quantum circuits. Specifically, this paper makes two important contributions. We automatically uncover special properties of a quantum circuit, such as purely classical states, superposition states, and entangled states using statistical methods. We also perform automated placement of quantum assertions to maximize the functional coverage as well as minimize the hardware overhead. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the generated assertions in error detection using a suite of quantum benchmarks, including Shor's factoring algorithm and Grover's search algorithm.
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers consisting of tens of inherently noisy quantum bits (qubits) suffer from reliability problems. Qubits and their gates are susceptible to various types of errors. Due to limited numbers of qubits and high error rates, quantum error correction cannot be applied. Physical constraints of quantum hardware including the error rates are used to guide the design and the layout of quantum circuits. The error rates determine the selection of qubits and their operations. The resulting circuit is executed on the quantum computer. This study explores the risk of unexpected changes in the error rates of NISQ computers post-calibration. We show that unexpected changes in error rates can alter the output state of a quantum circuit. To detect these changes, we propose the insertion of test points into the quantum circuit to enable online monitoring of the physical qubit behavior. We utilize classical, superposition, and uncompute test points. Furthermore, we use a gate error coverage metric to assess the quality of the tests. We verify the effectiveness of the proposed scheme on different IBM quantum computers (IBM Q), in addition to a noisy simulation that shows the scalability of the proposed approach.