Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

From EPR-Schrödinger Paradox to Nonlocality Based on Perfect Correlations

Jean Bricmont, Sheldon Goldstein, Douglas L. Hemmick

Published May 7, 2022• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10701-022-00568-8

Related papers

Schrödinger’s Paradox and Proofs of Nonlocality Using Only Perfect Correlations

Jean Bricmont, Sheldon Goldstein, Douglas Hemmick

arXiv:1808.01648•Journal of Statistical Physics•Aug 20, 2019•8 citations

From EPR-Schr\"odinger paradoxes to proofs of non locality

Jean Bricmont, Sheldon Goldstein, Douglas L. Hemmick

•May 2, 2020•0 citations

Relativistic Nonlocality and the EPR Paradox

Thomas W. Chamberlain

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 7, 2014•0 citations

Schrödinger’s Paradox and Nonlocality

Douglas L. Hemmick, Asif M. Shakur

SpringerBriefs in physics•Sep 30, 2011•0 citations

From EPR, Schrödinger paradox to nonlocality based on perfect correlation

Jean Bricmont, Sheldon Goldstein, Douglas L. Hemmick

We give a conceptually simple proof of nonlocality using only the perfect correlations between results of measurements on distant systems discussed by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen---correlations that EPR thought proved the incompleteness of quantum mechanics. Our argument relies on an extension of EPR by Schrödinger.

arXiv:2005.00859•May 2, 2020•1 citation

The entangled measurement state is not a paradoxical superposition of the detector

Art Hobson

The entangled state that results when a detector measures a superposed quantum system has spawned decades of concern about the problem of definite outcomes or "Schrodinger's cat." This state seems to describe a detector in an indefinite or "smeared" situation of indicating two macroscopic configurations simultaneously. This would be paradoxical. Since all entangled states are known to have nonlocal properties, and since measurements have obvious nonlocal characteristics, it's natural to turn to nonlocality experiments for insight into this question. Unlike the measurement situation where the phase is fixed at zero for perfect correlations, nonlocality experiments cover the full range of superposition phases and can thus show precisely what entangled states superpose. For two-state systems, these experiments reveal that the measurement state is not a superposition of two macroscopically different detector states but instead a superposition of two coherent correlations between distinct detector states and corresponding system states. In the measurement situation (i.e. at zero phase), and assuming the Schrodinger's cat scenario, the entangled state can be read as follows: An undecayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with an alive cat, AND a decayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with a dead cat, where "AND" indicates the superposition. This is not paradoxical.

arXiv:1912.05439•Dec 9, 2019•0 citations
The entangled state that results when a detector measures a superposed quantum system has spawned decades of concern about the problem of definite outcomes or "Schrodinger's cat." This state seems to describe a detector in an indefinite or "smeared" situation of indicating two macroscopic configurations simultaneously. This would be paradoxical. Since all entangled states are known to have nonlocal properties, and since measurements have obvious nonlocal characteristics, it's natural to turn to nonlocality experiments for insight into this question. Unlike the measurement situation where the phase is fixed at zero for perfect correlations, nonlocality experiments cover the full range of superposition phases and can thus show precisely what entangled states superpose. For two-state systems, these experiments reveal that the measurement state is not a superposition of two macroscopically different detector states but instead a superposition of two coherent correlations between distinct detector states and corresponding system states. In the measurement situation (i.e. at zero phase), and assuming the Schrodinger's cat scenario, the entangled state can be read as follows: An undecayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with an alive cat, AND a decayed nucleus is perfectly correlated with a dead cat, where "AND" indicates the superposition. This is not paradoxical.