Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Role of weak values in strong measurements

F. De Zela

Published Apr 4, 2022• 12 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The physical meaning of the quantum weak value still remains a matter of debate. Originally introduced by Aharonov et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988).] as another counterintuitive feature of quantum mechanics, it eventually evolved into a practical tool that is widely used. The theoretical framework in which weak values were introduced was given by von Neumann's model of quantum measurements. In this model, a system is submitted to measurement by coupling it to a ``pointer,'' or meter. In the weak-coupling regime, one may perform a low-order Taylor expansion for the evolution operator of the system and meter. This standard approach ties weak values with weak couplings and weak measurements. We report closed-form expressions that can be used to untie weak values from weak measurements. The regime of strong measurements thereby becomes accessible to weak values, without leaving the framework in which the latter were originally introduced. The reported results should also help us to better understand the physical meaning of weak values.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.105.042202

Related papers

Weak values in strong measurements

F. De Zela

We report closed-form expressions in which weak values show up in connection with both weak and strong measurements. The regime of strong coupling between pointer and system is thereby made available to weak-value measurements. As an application, we propose an all-optical setup that could be used with both single photons and optical light beams. Moreover, the theoretical results we report should provide some more insight into the physical content of weak values.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation

Weak measurement takes a simple form for cumulants

Graeme Mitchison

A weak measurement on a system is made by coupling a pointer weakly to the system and then measuring the position of the pointer. If the initial wave function for the pointer is real, the mean displacement of the pointer is proportional to the so-called weak value of the observable being measured. This gives an intuitively direct way of understanding weak measurement. However, if the initial pointer wave function takes complex values, the relationship between pointer displacement and weak value is not quite so simple, as pointed out recently by Jozsa [R. Jozsa, Phys. Rev. A 76, 044103 (2007)]. This is even more striking in the case of sequential weak measurements [G. Mitchison, R. Jozsa, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062105 (2007)]. These are carried out by coupling several pointers at different stages of the evolution of the system, and the relationship between the products of the measured pointer positions and the sequential weak values can become extremely complicated for an arbitrary initial pointer wave function. Surprisingly, all this complication vanishes when one calculates the cumulants of pointer positions. These are directly proportional to the cumulants of sequential weak values. This suggests that cumulants have a fundamental physical significance for weak measurement.

arXiv:0710.5113•Physical Review A•May 2, 2008•12 citations

What Weak Measurements and Weak Values Really Mean: Reply to Kastner

Eliahu Cohen

Despite their important applications in metrology and in spite of numerous experimental demonstrations, weak measurements are still confusing for part of the community. This sometimes leads to unjustified criticism. Recent papers have experimentally clarified the meaning and practical significance of weak measurements, yet in Kastner (Found Phys 47:697-707, 2017), Kastner seems to take us many years backwards in the the debate, casting doubt on the very term "weak value" and the meaning of weak measurements. Kastner appears to ignore both the basics and frontiers of weak measurements and misinterprets the weak measurement process and its outcomes. In addition, she accuses the authors of Aharonov et al. (Ann Phys 355:258-268, 2015) in statements completely opposite to the ones they have actually made. There are many points of disagreement between Kastner and us, but in this short reply I will leave aside the ontology (which is indeed interpretational and far more complex than that described by Kastner) and focus mainly on the injustice in her criticism. I shall add some general comments regarding the broader theory of weak measurements and the two-state-vector formalism, as well as supporting experimental results. Finally, I will point out some recent promising results, which can be proven by (strong) projective measurements, without the need of employing weak measurements.

arXiv:1704.00958•Foundations of Physics•Jun 16, 2017•12 citations

Weak values and weak measurements in quantum mechanics

Ludvík Vízdal

The main goal of this thesis is to introdude to readers the concept of weak measure- ments in quantum mechanics. Firstly a model of indirect measuremnts is established as an alternative to Von Neumann measurement postulate. This model leads to a possible generalization in a form of weak measurements. Then the concept of postselection is introduced and involved into the issue of weak measurements which leads to the weak values of physical quantities. All these theoretical concepts are presented using simple model examples. Finally, a discussion in provided on the possible interpretation and of weak values and their experimental verification.

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

An introduction to quantum measurements with a historical motivation

Leonardo Andreta de Castro, Olímpio Pereira de Sá Neto, Carlos Alexandre Brasil

We provide an introduction to the theory of quantum measurements that is centered on the pivotal role played by John von Neumann's model. This introduction is accessible to students and researchers from outside the field of foundations of quantum mechanics and presented within a historical context. We first explain the origins and the meaning of the measurement problem in quantum theory, and why it is not present in classical physics. We perform a chronological review of the quantization of action and explain how this led to successive restrictions on what could be measured in atomic phenomena, until the consolidation of the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics. The clear separation between quantum system and classical apparatus that causes these restrictions is subverted in von Neumann's paradigmatic model of quantum measurements, a subject whose concepts we explain, while also providing the mathematical tools necessary to apply it to new problems. We show how this model was important in discussing the interpretations of quantum mechanics and how it is still relevant in modern applications. In particular, we explain in detail how it can be used to describe weak measurements and the surprising results they entail. We also discuss the limitations of von Neumann's model of measurements, and explain how they can be overcome with POVMs and Kraus operators. We provide the mathematical tools necessary to work with these generalized measurements and to derive master equations from them. Finally, we demonstrate how these can be applied in research problems by calculating the Quantum Zeno Effect.

arXiv:1908.03949•Aug 11, 2019•4 citations

Multitime measurements in quantum mechanics

M. S. Wang

The one-time and two-time measurements are studied by employing the idea of Aharonov et al. that the strength of a measurement depends on the state of the measuring device in the context of von Neumann measurement theory. A measurement is classified as either a strong or a weak measurement depending on whether the interaction between the system and the measuring device is infinitely large or negligibly small. A single strong measurement yields one of the eigenvalues of the operator while a single weak measurement, in addition to the eigenvalues, has infinite other possible outcomes. Nevertheless, the expectation values of the strong and the weak one-time measurements are the same. However, the expectation values of the two-time measurements depend on the strength of the first measurement. For the strong case the result is consistent with the conventional result without having to introduce the state collapsing. For the weak case the result is the real part of the expectation value of the time-ordered two-time operator. The fact that this expectation value cannot be factorized indicates that the entanglement between the system and the measuring device introduced by a weak measurement cannot be neglected.

Physical Review A•Jan 4, 2002•5 citations
The physical meaning of the quantum weak value still remains a matter of debate. Originally introduced by Aharonov et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988).] as another counterintuitive feature of quantum mechanics, it eventually evolved into a practical tool that is widely used. The theoretical framework in which weak values were introduced was given by von Neumann's model of quantum measurements. In this model, a system is submitted to measurement by coupling it to a ``pointer,'' or meter. In the weak-coupling regime, one may perform a low-order Taylor expansion for the evolution operator of the system and meter. This standard approach ties weak values with weak couplings and weak measurements. We report closed-form expressions that can be used to untie weak values from weak measurements. The regime of strong measurements thereby becomes accessible to weak values, without leaving the framework in which the latter were originally introduced. The reported results should also help us to better understand the physical meaning of weak values.
A weak measurement on a system is made by coupling a pointer weakly to the system and then measuring the position of the pointer. If the initial wave function for the pointer is real, the mean displacement of the pointer is proportional to the so-called weak value of the observable being measured. This gives an intuitively direct way of understanding weak measurement. However, if the initial pointer wave function takes complex values, the relationship between pointer displacement and weak value is not quite so simple, as pointed out recently by Jozsa [R. Jozsa, Phys. Rev. A 76, 044103 (2007)]. This is even more striking in the case of sequential weak measurements [G. Mitchison, R. Jozsa, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062105 (2007)]. These are carried out by coupling several pointers at different stages of the evolution of the system, and the relationship between the products of the measured pointer positions and the sequential weak values can become extremely complicated for an arbitrary initial pointer wave function. Surprisingly, all this complication vanishes when one calculates the cumulants of pointer positions. These are directly proportional to the cumulants of sequential weak values. This suggests that cumulants have a fundamental physical significance for weak measurement.
Despite their important applications in metrology and in spite of numerous experimental demonstrations, weak measurements are still confusing for part of the community. This sometimes leads to unjustified criticism. Recent papers have experimentally clarified the meaning and practical significance of weak measurements, yet in Kastner (Found Phys 47:697-707, 2017), Kastner seems to take us many years backwards in the the debate, casting doubt on the very term "weak value" and the meaning of weak measurements. Kastner appears to ignore both the basics and frontiers of weak measurements and misinterprets the weak measurement process and its outcomes. In addition, she accuses the authors of Aharonov et al. (Ann Phys 355:258-268, 2015) in statements completely opposite to the ones they have actually made. There are many points of disagreement between Kastner and us, but in this short reply I will leave aside the ontology (which is indeed interpretational and far more complex than that described by Kastner) and focus mainly on the injustice in her criticism. I shall add some general comments regarding the broader theory of weak measurements and the two-state-vector formalism, as well as supporting experimental results. Finally, I will point out some recent promising results, which can be proven by (strong) projective measurements, without the need of employing weak measurements.
The main goal of this thesis is to introdude to readers the concept of weak measure- ments in quantum mechanics. Firstly a model of indirect measuremnts is established as an alternative to Von Neumann measurement postulate. This model leads to a possible generalization in a form of weak measurements. Then the concept of postselection is introduced and involved into the issue of weak measurements which leads to the weak values of physical quantities. All these theoretical concepts are presented using simple model examples. Finally, a discussion in provided on the possible interpretation and of weak values and their experimental verification.
We provide an introduction to the theory of quantum measurements that is centered on the pivotal role played by John von Neumann's model. This introduction is accessible to students and researchers from outside the field of foundations of quantum mechanics and presented within a historical context. We first explain the origins and the meaning of the measurement problem in quantum theory, and why it is not present in classical physics. We perform a chronological review of the quantization of action and explain how this led to successive restrictions on what could be measured in atomic phenomena, until the consolidation of the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics. The clear separation between quantum system and classical apparatus that causes these restrictions is subverted in von Neumann's paradigmatic model of quantum measurements, a subject whose concepts we explain, while also providing the mathematical tools necessary to apply it to new problems. We show how this model was important in discussing the interpretations of quantum mechanics and how it is still relevant in modern applications. In particular, we explain in detail how it can be used to describe weak measurements and the surprising results they entail. We also discuss the limitations of von Neumann's model of measurements, and explain how they can be overcome with POVMs and Kraus operators. We provide the mathematical tools necessary to work with these generalized measurements and to derive master equations from them. Finally, we demonstrate how these can be applied in research problems by calculating the Quantum Zeno Effect.
The one-time and two-time measurements are studied by employing the idea of Aharonov et al. that the strength of a measurement depends on the state of the measuring device in the context of von Neumann measurement theory. A measurement is classified as either a strong or a weak measurement depending on whether the interaction between the system and the measuring device is infinitely large or negligibly small. A single strong measurement yields one of the eigenvalues of the operator while a single weak measurement, in addition to the eigenvalues, has infinite other possible outcomes. Nevertheless, the expectation values of the strong and the weak one-time measurements are the same. However, the expectation values of the two-time measurements depend on the strength of the first measurement. For the strong case the result is consistent with the conventional result without having to introduce the state collapsing. For the weak case the result is the real part of the expectation value of the time-ordered two-time operator. The fact that this expectation value cannot be factorized indicates that the entanglement between the system and the measuring device introduced by a weak measurement cannot be neglected.