The nature of quantum mechanics provides us with an opportunity to statistically detect eavesdropping in quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, which is unimaginable in classical digital communications. By utilizing Hoeffding’s inequality, this study analyzes the upper bounds of the false-positive ratio (FPR) and false-negative ratio (FNR) of eavesdropping detection in the Bennett–Brassard-84 (BB84) QKD protocol, where eavesdropping is detected if the measured quantum bit error rate (QBER) is equal to or higher than a threshold. The analysis clarifies the trade-off between the accuracy of eavesdropping detection and the economy of quantum resources in the BB84 protocol. Owing to the central limit theorem, the QBER measured by 300 quantum bits (qubits) is sufficient to guarantee lower than 0.009% of the FPR and FNR of eavesdropping detection. To deal with rapidly varying quantum channel conditions, this study further introduces grouped BB84 protocol and combinatory eavesdropping detection algorithms. A polarization basis is changeable for a group of qubits, and eavesdropping is judged by a combination of criteria between QBER and group-QBER in the proposed protocol and algorithms. In our extensive simulation study, the grouped BB84 protocol with 300 qubits comparison guarantees at least 99.92% accuracy in eavesdropping detection under rapidly varying quantum channel conditions.
The nature of quantum mechanics provides us with an opportunity to statistically detect eavesdropping in quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols, which is unimaginable in classical digital communications. By utilizing Hoeffding’s inequality, this study analyzes the upper bounds of the false-positive ratio (FPR) and false-negative ratio (FNR) of eavesdropping detection in the Bennett–Brassard-84 (BB84) QKD protocol, where eavesdropping is detected if the measured quantum bit error rate (QBER) is equal to or higher than a threshold. The analysis clarifies the trade-off between the accuracy of eavesdropping detection and the economy of quantum resources in the BB84 protocol. Owing to the central limit theorem, the QBER measured by 300 quantum bits (qubits) is sufficient to guarantee lower than 0.009% of the FPR and FNR of eavesdropping detection. To deal with rapidly varying quantum channel conditions, this study further introduces grouped BB84 protocol and combinatory eavesdropping detection algorithms. A polarization basis is changeable for a group of qubits, and eavesdropping is judged by a combination of criteria between QBER and group-QBER in the proposed protocol and algorithms. In our extensive simulation study, the grouped BB84 protocol with 300 qubits comparison guarantees at least 99.92% accuracy in eavesdropping detection under rapidly varying quantum channel conditions.
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) provides an innovative approach for secure communication by utilizing the principles of quantum mechanics. Among various QKD protocols, the BB84 protocol remains the most widely studied and implemented due to its simplicity and theoretical security guarantees. However, practical implementations of BB84 are vulnerable to several eavesdropping attacks and channel imperfections. This paper presents a comprehensive study on the detection and analysis of eavesdropping attacks in the BB84 protocol. The work focuses on common attacks such as intercept-resend attack, photon-number splitting attack, Trojan horse attack, and phase-covariant cloning attack. The effect of these attacks on Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER) is analyzed in detail. Simulation-based observations are discussed to demonstrate how QBER increases under malicious interference. The study further explores statistical methods for detecting eavesdropping and examines practical countermeasures including decoy states, privacy amplification, and error correction techniques. The paper concludes that BB84 remains robust against eavesdropping when proper detection and mitigation mechanisms are employed.
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) provides information-theoretic security by exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics. Among QKD protocols, the BB84 scheme remains the most widely adopted for both theoretical research and practical implementation. A critical parameter determining the reliability and security of BB84 is the Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER), which quantifies errors in the sifted key arising from channel noise or potential eavesdropping. This paper presents a systematic review and analysis of QBER within the BB84 protocol, examining its calculation, statistical estimation methods, and role in detecting eavesdropping activity. Simulation results, corroborated by reported experimental observations, reveal a near-linear relationship between eavesdropping intensity and QBER, with values approaching 25% under full intercept-resend attacks. Four confidence interval estimation methods, Wald, Wilson, Clopper-Pearson, and Hoeffding's inequality, are compared for robust QBER analysis in finite-key scenarios. Protocol enhancements, including decoy-state methods, hybrid cryptographic models, and quantum-resistant authentication, are discussed as mechanisms to mitigate errors and strengthen resilience across fiber, free-space, underwater, and satellite QKD systems. Open challenges in distinguishing noise-induced errors from malicious eavesdropping, and the role of adaptive error correction and machine-learning-assisted QBER estimation in future quantum networks, are identified as key directions for further research.
Quantum key distribution (QKD) enables secure communication using the principles of quantum physics. The BB84 protocol is not only effective for secure key sharing but also for detecting eavesdropping. This study simulates a computational model of QKD and analyzes error rates under varying numbers of bits. Using Python-based simulations with n = 10, n = 100, and n = 1000 bits, and a fixed noise probability of 0.02, we evaluated scenarios both with and without eavesdropping over 1000 trials. The results show an average error rate of 2% without eavesdropping and over 26% with eavesdropping. Standard deviation increases with lower n, indicating higher variability. This study validates BB84’s robustness under noise and demonstrates its sensitivity to third-party interference.
Abstract Secure military communications depend on the confidentiality of exchanged cryptographic keys across command centers, satellite links, and classified order transmission. Classical key-distribution protocols rely on computational hardness assumptions that provide no intrinsic mechanism for detecting interception; an adversary who copies transmitted ciphertext leaves no physical trace. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), and specifically the BB84 protocol, replaces this assumption with a physical guarantee derived from quantum mechanics: any attempt to measure an unknown quantum state necessarily disturbs it, rendering interception statistically detectable. This study implements the BB84 protocol at the circuit level — qubit state preparation, basis selection, interception modeling, and measurement — and validates its central security property, the Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER) signature of eavesdropping, in two stages: (1) a noiseless statevector simulation using the PKTron quantum computing framework over ten independent trials per condition, and (2) hardware execution on IBM Quantum's ibm_fez superconducting processor. In simulation, the average QBER without an eavesdropper was 0.000, and with a full intercept-resend attack was 0.248, closely matching the theoretical prediction of 0.25. On real hardware, the undisturbed channel returned QBER = 0.000 (19 sifted bits) and the eavesdropped channel returned QBER = 0.261 (23 sifted bits), in close agreement with both theory and the simulated baseline. These results provide a reproducible, two-platform validation of the eavesdropper-detection mechanism that underlies the security claims made for QKD-protected communications. This study validates the cryptographic detection primitive only; it does not constitute a deployed secure communications system, and extending these results to operational command, satellite, or classified-order channels requires physical single-photon transmission hardware, authenticated classical channels, and full key-management infrastructure outside the scope of this work.
The rapid progress of quantum computing demands secure communication protocols which are beyond classical cryptographic techniques. This necessity of Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is met by providing security relying on the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics. In the work presented, the BB84 protocol is implemented using Qiskit platform provided by IBM. The performance is analyzed for both the ideal channel conditions and an intercept–resend eavesdropping scenario studying its security behavior and performance. 100% key agreement is observed with a QBER of 0% for the BB84 protocol executed under the ideal condition. When an eavesdropper is introduced, the QBER increases significantly, ranging from 16% to 38%, exceeding the acceptable security threshold of 11% and resulting in complete rejection of the generated key. Performance analysis carried out for key sizes between 100 and 1000 qubits shows that the execution time follows O(n) trend growing linearly. This simulation validates the correct operation of the BB84 protocol and demonstrates a detailed performance and security analysis of a QKD system using IBM Qiskit.
This study proposes a quantum key distribution (QKD) method based on the BB84 protocol, enhanced with quantum entanglement to improve key integrity and eavesdropping detection. The protocol employs two complementary metrics: Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER) and Entanglement Check Ratio (ECR). QBER measures errors in key bits when both parties use the same basis, serving as the primary intrusion detector, while ECR reflects the proportion of entangled qubit pairs maintaining correlation across cross-basis measurements, acting as an indicator of entanglement integrity. The Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) test further validates entanglement by confirming Bell inequality violations. Simulation results show that the protocol effectively detects eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle (MiTM) attacks, with QBER rising under attack and ECR/CHSH values reflecting statistical entanglement degradation. Evaluation under practical noise conditions, including photon loss and detector inefficiency, demonstrates that ECR reliably indicates entanglement integrity even when the number of sifted key bits is reduced, while QBER remains the primary indicator of intrusion. This dual-metric approach, reinforced by CHSH analysis, provides a robust framework for detecting external interference and validating quantum behavior internally. The proposed entangled BB84 protocol offers a secure and efficient QKD solution, with potential for extension to long-distance and more physically robust implementations.