Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Information Processing

Bell’s inequality with biased experimental settings

Parvinder Singh, Jyoti Faujdar, Maitreyee Sarkar, Atul Kumar

Published Apr 30, 2022• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11128-022-03504-x

Related papers

Bell's inequality without alternative settings

Adán Cabello

arXiv:quant-ph/0210081•Physics Letters A•May 19, 2003•4 citations

Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis

Bas Hensen, Norbert Kalb, Machiel Blok +11 more

The recently reported violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electronic spins in diamonds (Hensen et al., Nature 526, 682-686) provided the first loophole-free evidence against local-realist theories of nature. Here we report on data from a second Bell experiment using the same experimental setup with minor modifications. We find a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality of 2.35 ± 0.18, in agreement with the first run, yielding an overall value of S = 2.38 ± 0.14. We calculate the resulting P-values of the second experiment and of the combined Bell tests. We provide an additional analysis of the distribution of settings choices recorded during the two tests, finding that the observed distributions are consistent with uniform settings for both tests. Finally, we analytically study the effect of particular models of random number generator (RNG) imperfection on our hypothesis test. We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bounded knowing only the mean of the RNG bias. This implies that our experimental result is robust for any model underlying the estimated average RNG bias, for random bits produced up to 690 ns too early by the random number generator.

arXiv:1603.05705•Scientific Reports•Aug 11, 2016•95 citations

Bell’s Inequalities Experiments

Climério Paulo da Silva Neto

SpringerBriefs in history of science and technology•Jan 1, 2023•0 citations

Testing the Bell’s inequality violations with mixed entangled photons

Weijie Guo, Lian-Fu Wei, Dai-He Fan

Bell’s inequality plays an important role in quantum mechanics. Many experiments have been made to test the Bell’s inequality by using various bipartite entangled sources. However, the maximal violation of the Bell inequality (i.e., the Cirel’son’s limit) has not been reached yet, due to various practically-existing imperfections (e.g., entangled source is not the pure maximally-entangled state, and the measurement settings used are not the best ones). In this paper, we investigate experimentally an approach to enhance the violation degree of Bell’s inequality with the commercialized entangled photons by optimizing the measurement settings for the experimentally-reconstructed density matrix of the entangled photons. It is shown that the measurement setting related to the pure entangled state can not get maximally violation generally. However, upon the density matrix reconstructed by tomographic technique, optimal measurement settings can be found. With these optimal settings, we consequently found that the violation degree of the Bell’s inequality can be increased. This suggests a possible approach to optimize the test of Bell’s inequality.

Zhongguo kexue. Wulixue Lixue Tianwenxue•Aug 1, 2013•0 citations

Stronger Hardy-type paradox based on the Bell inequality and its experimental test

Mu Yang, Hui-Xian Meng, Jie Zhou +7 more

Local realistic models cannot completely describe all predictions of quantum mechanics. This is known as Bell's theorem that can be revealed either by violations of Bell inequality, or all-versus-nothing proof of nonlocality. Hardy's paradox is an important all-versus-nothing proof and is considered as ``the simplest form of Bell's theorem.'' In this work, we advance the study of Hardy's paradox based on Bell's inequality. Our formalism is essentially equivalent to the ``logical Bell inequality'' formalism developed by Abramsky and Hardy, but ours is more easily applied to experimental tests. Remarkably, we find that not only for a two-qubit two-setting case but also for a two-qubit four-setting case, we can construct stronger Hardy-type paradoxes based on Bell's inequality, whose successful probabilities can attain four times and seven times larger than the original one, respectively, thus providing more friendly tests for experiment. Meanwhile, we experimentally test the stronger Hardy-type paradoxes in a two-qubit system. Within the experimental errors, the experimental results coincide with the theoretical predictions.

arXiv:1809.04289•Physical Review A•Mar 5, 2019•26 citations

Experimental Tests of Bell’s Inequalities

Alain Aspect, Philippe Grangier

NATO ASI series. Series B : Physics•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations
The recently reported violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electronic spins in diamonds (Hensen et al., Nature 526, 682-686) provided the first loophole-free evidence against local-realist theories of nature. Here we report on data from a second Bell experiment using the same experimental setup with minor modifications. We find a violation of the CHSH-Bell inequality of 2.35 ± 0.18, in agreement with the first run, yielding an overall value of S = 2.38 ± 0.14. We calculate the resulting P-values of the second experiment and of the combined Bell tests. We provide an additional analysis of the distribution of settings choices recorded during the two tests, finding that the observed distributions are consistent with uniform settings for both tests. Finally, we analytically study the effect of particular models of random number generator (RNG) imperfection on our hypothesis test. We find that the winning probability per trial in the CHSH game can be bounded knowing only the mean of the RNG bias. This implies that our experimental result is robust for any model underlying the estimated average RNG bias, for random bits produced up to 690 ns too early by the random number generator.
Bell’s inequality plays an important role in quantum mechanics. Many experiments have been made to test the Bell’s inequality by using various bipartite entangled sources. However, the maximal violation of the Bell inequality (i.e., the Cirel’son’s limit) has not been reached yet, due to various practically-existing imperfections (e.g., entangled source is not the pure maximally-entangled state, and the measurement settings used are not the best ones). In this paper, we investigate experimentally an approach to enhance the violation degree of Bell’s inequality with the commercialized entangled photons by optimizing the measurement settings for the experimentally-reconstructed density matrix of the entangled photons. It is shown that the measurement setting related to the pure entangled state can not get maximally violation generally. However, upon the density matrix reconstructed by tomographic technique, optimal measurement settings can be found. With these optimal settings, we consequently found that the violation degree of the Bell’s inequality can be increased. This suggests a possible approach to optimize the test of Bell’s inequality.
Local realistic models cannot completely describe all predictions of quantum mechanics. This is known as Bell's theorem that can be revealed either by violations of Bell inequality, or all-versus-nothing proof of nonlocality. Hardy's paradox is an important all-versus-nothing proof and is considered as ``the simplest form of Bell's theorem.'' In this work, we advance the study of Hardy's paradox based on Bell's inequality. Our formalism is essentially equivalent to the ``logical Bell inequality'' formalism developed by Abramsky and Hardy, but ours is more easily applied to experimental tests. Remarkably, we find that not only for a two-qubit two-setting case but also for a two-qubit four-setting case, we can construct stronger Hardy-type paradoxes based on Bell's inequality, whose successful probabilities can attain four times and seven times larger than the original one, respectively, thus providing more friendly tests for experiment. Meanwhile, we experimentally test the stronger Hardy-type paradoxes in a two-qubit system. Within the experimental errors, the experimental results coincide with the theoretical predictions.