Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks

Epilogue

James Luke, David Porter, Padmanabhan Santhanam

Published Apr 1, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In a particularly interesting analysis of quantum mechanics known as the “many worlds interpretation”, every fundamental event or decision in the universe splits the universe into a series of alternate realities. There are billions and billions of universes with each one representing a different reality.
DOI
10.1201/9781003108498-13

Related papers

A discrete, finite multiverse

McKenzie, Alan

The Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) famously avoids the issue of wave function collapse. Different MWI trees representing the same quantum events can have different topologies, depending upon the observer. However, they are all isomorphic to the group of block universes containing all of the outcomes of all of the events, and so, in that sense, the group of block universes is a more fundamental representation. Different branches of the MWI tree, representing different universes in MWI, ultimately share the same quantum state in a common ancestor branch. This branching topology is incompatible with that of the Minkowski block universe; the resolution is to replace the branches with discrete, parallel block universes, each of which extends from the trunk to the outermost twigs. The number of universes in a branch is proportional to its thickness which, in turn, depends upon the absolute square of the probability amplitude for the state in that branch. Every quantum event may be represented by a kernel of universes, which is the smallest group of universes that will reproduce the quantum probabilities of the outcomes of that event. By considering the ratios of the probabilities of the outcomes of any event, it can be shown that the number of universes in every kernel must finite, as must be the total number of universes in the multiverse. Further, every universe in the multiverse must be finite both in space and time. Another consequence is that quantum probabilities must be rational, which suggests that quantum mechanics is only an approximation to a discrete theory. A corollary is that not every conceivable universe exists in the multiverse, no doubt to the disappointment of those who enjoy alternate-history novels.

arXiv:1609.04050•Sep 10, 2016•1 citation

Many worlds interpretation of quantum theory

Helena Reymond, Loı̈c M. Roch

•Jan 1, 2011•8 citations

One World, One Reality, and the Everett Relaltive State Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Paul L. Csonka

We modify the Relative State Interpretation (RSI) of Quantum Mechanics so that it does not imply many worlds and parallel realities. We drop the assumption that probability amplitudes correspond one-to-one with reality: Not all information is contained in amplitudes, and not all amplitudes need be realized. Amplitudes do not "collapse" after a measurement, but evolve continuously, including unrealized ones. After each "event" only one possible outcome is realized. Therefore, if a value is measured, that value is real, all others are not; there is only one reality and one world. Reality content is "quantized" : unity for realized outcomes, zero for all others. It is "conserved": can move along any possible sequence of events, but only one at a time. The modified RSI is is strictly deterministic in the sense that the "global" probability amplitudes of the universe are determined for all times by the laws of physics and the initial conditions. They guide all events. But it is not deterministic in the sense that from the amplitudes one can not predict which outcome actually happens; that represents new information that accumulates as history unfolds. To the extent that information is part of the physical world, the coming into being of the universe is ongoing, even after the Big Bang. All predictions of the two versions agree, except possibly in esoteric, untested cases.

arXiv:0901.4580•Jan 28, 2009•0 citations

Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•630 citations

The Many-Universes Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Bryce Seligman DeWitt

Princeton University Press eBooks•Apr 24, 2015•140 citations

Charl's Theorys

Charles Norman

Charl's Theorys is an evolving personal inquiry into the nature of reality, time, observation, information, entanglement, human decision-making, and possible futures.The work developed through a series of questions and propositions concerning how individual decisions continually affect future outcomes; whether reality may be understood as a continuously updating path through an immense landscape of possibilities; the relationship between this idea and concepts from quantum mechanics, relativity, entanglement and Many-Worlds interpretations; and whether information might exist or be accessible beyond an individual's immediately experienced path.The document also explores questions involving the speed of light and an expanding universe, quantum observation and the double-slit experiment, the Mandela effect, time travel and cascading changes to future events, the possible significance of exceptional human insight, and parallels with the concept of the Akashic Records.Charl's propositions and questions are intentionally distinguished from ChatGPT's responses and commentary throughout the document. The work is not presented as experimental proof or as a completed scientific theory. It is published as an open record of interconnected ideas and questions, inviting consideration, discussion, criticism, and further development by interested readers.Public Edition 1.0 — September 29, 2026.

•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations
The Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) famously avoids the issue of wave function collapse. Different MWI trees representing the same quantum events can have different topologies, depending upon the observer. However, they are all isomorphic to the group of block universes containing all of the outcomes of all of the events, and so, in that sense, the group of block universes is a more fundamental representation. Different branches of the MWI tree, representing different universes in MWI, ultimately share the same quantum state in a common ancestor branch. This branching topology is incompatible with that of the Minkowski block universe; the resolution is to replace the branches with discrete, parallel block universes, each of which extends from the trunk to the outermost twigs. The number of universes in a branch is proportional to its thickness which, in turn, depends upon the absolute square of the probability amplitude for the state in that branch. Every quantum event may be represented by a kernel of universes, which is the smallest group of universes that will reproduce the quantum probabilities of the outcomes of that event. By considering the ratios of the probabilities of the outcomes of any event, it can be shown that the number of universes in every kernel must finite, as must be the total number of universes in the multiverse. Further, every universe in the multiverse must be finite both in space and time. Another consequence is that quantum probabilities must be rational, which suggests that quantum mechanics is only an approximation to a discrete theory. A corollary is that not every conceivable universe exists in the multiverse, no doubt to the disappointment of those who enjoy alternate-history novels.
We modify the Relative State Interpretation (RSI) of Quantum Mechanics so that it does not imply many worlds and parallel realities. We drop the assumption that probability amplitudes correspond one-to-one with reality: Not all information is contained in amplitudes, and not all amplitudes need be realized. Amplitudes do not "collapse" after a measurement, but evolve continuously, including unrealized ones. After each "event" only one possible outcome is realized. Therefore, if a value is measured, that value is real, all others are not; there is only one reality and one world. Reality content is "quantized" : unity for realized outcomes, zero for all others. It is "conserved": can move along any possible sequence of events, but only one at a time. The modified RSI is is strictly deterministic in the sense that the "global" probability amplitudes of the universe are determined for all times by the laws of physics and the initial conditions. They guide all events. But it is not deterministic in the sense that from the amplitudes one can not predict which outcome actually happens; that represents new information that accumulates as history unfolds. To the extent that information is part of the physical world, the coming into being of the universe is ongoing, even after the Big Bang. All predictions of the two versions agree, except possibly in esoteric, untested cases.
Charl's Theorys is an evolving personal inquiry into the nature of reality, time, observation, information, entanglement, human decision-making, and possible futures.The work developed through a series of questions and propositions concerning how individual decisions continually affect future outcomes; whether reality may be understood as a continuously updating path through an immense landscape of possibilities; the relationship between this idea and concepts from quantum mechanics, relativity, entanglement and Many-Worlds interpretations; and whether information might exist or be accessible beyond an individual's immediately experienced path.The document also explores questions involving the speed of light and an expanding universe, quantum observation and the double-slit experiment, the Mandela effect, time travel and cascading changes to future events, the possible significance of exceptional human insight, and parallels with the concept of the Akashic Records.Charl's propositions and questions are intentionally distinguished from ChatGPT's responses and commentary throughout the document. The work is not presented as experimental proof or as a completed scientific theory. It is published as an open record of interconnected ideas and questions, inviting consideration, discussion, criticism, and further development by interested readers.Public Edition 1.0 — September 29, 2026.