Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

An Exact Quantum Polynomial-Time Algorithm for Solving k-Junta Problem with One Uncomplemented Product

Chien-Yuan Chen

Published Mar 1, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10773-022-04990-6

Related papers

An exact quantum algorithm for testing 3-junta in Boolean functions with one uncomplemented product

Chien-Yuan Chen

Quantum Information Processing•Jan 1, 2021•5 citations

A probabilistic quantum algorithm for testing 3‑junta in Boolean functions with one uncomplemented product

Songsong Dai

The Journal of Supercomputing•Oct 18, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Advantage in Tolerant Junta Testing

Avishay Tal, Weiqiang Yuan

We establish the first super-polynomial quantum advantage for the tolerant junta testing problem in the adaptive setting. Specifically, we show that within a certain parameter regime, tolerant $k$-junta testing with high precision can be solved using $\mathrm{poly}(k)$ quantum queries, whereas any classical algorithm requires at least $k^{Ω(\log k)}$ queries. The problem of tolerant $k$-junta testing is as follows: given parameters $(k, ε_1, ε_2)$, with $0\le ε_1<ε_2 \le 1/2$, and black-box access to a Boolean function $f$ (defined on $n$ variables), distinguish whether $f$ is $ε_1$-close to some $k$-junta or $ε_2$-far from every $k$-junta. We show the quantum advantage for a range of parameters close to $1/2$, for example, $ε_1 = 1/2-1/k$ and $ε_2 = 1/2-1/(2k^2)$. The (non-adaptive) quantum tester we use was given by a recent work of Bao, Liu, Yao, Ye, and Zhang (SOSA 2026). We slightly adapt their analysis to show that it holds in the above parameter regime. On the other hand, our classical lower bound requires substantial new ideas. Inspired by the lower bound techniques of Chen and Patel (FOCS 2023), we introduce a new hard distribution of ``yes'' instances (i.e., instances with distance at most $ε_1$ to $k$-juntas) that is based on planting an ``approximate-junta'' as follows: we randomly pick $k$ out of $n$ coordinates, and for each fixing of the $k$ coordinates, the $2^{n-k}$ values in the restricted subcube are drawn randomly except for the set of points in an error-correcting code on which we place the same random bit. We show that this distribution is much closer to $k$-juntas than the uniform distribution, but on the other hand, they are indistinguishable with respect to any classical algorithm making $k^{o(\log k)}$ queries.

cs.CCCross-listedarXiv:2606.23194•Jun 23, 2026•0 citations

A Exact Quantum Learning Algorithm for the 2-Junta Problem in Constant Time

Chien-Yuan Chen

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Aug 3, 2022•4 citations

An exact quantum logarithmic time algorithm for the 3-junta problem

Chien-Yuan Chen

Quantum Information Processing•Jun 7, 2024•3 citations

An Exact Quantum Algorithm for the 2-Junta Problem

Chien-Yuan Chen

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 2021•5 citations
We establish the first super-polynomial quantum advantage for the tolerant junta testing problem in the adaptive setting. Specifically, we show that within a certain parameter regime, tolerant kkk-junta testing with high precision can be solved using poly(k)\mathrm{poly}(k)poly(k) quantum queries, whereas any classical algorithm requires at least kΩ(log⁡k)k^{Ω(\log k)}kΩ(logk) queries. The problem of tolerant kkk-junta testing is as follows: given parameters (k,ε1,ε2)(k, ε_1, ε_2)(k,ε1​,ε2​), with 0≤ε1<ε2≤1/20\le ε_1<ε_2 \le 1/20≤ε1​<ε2​≤1/2, and black-box access to a Boolean function fff (defined on nnn variables), distinguish whether fff is ε1ε_1ε1​-close to some kkk-junta or ε2ε_2ε2​-far from every kkk-junta. We show the quantum advantage for a range of parameters close to 1/21/21/2, for example, ε1=1/2−1/kε_1 = 1/2-1/kε1​=1/2−1/k and ε2=1/2−1/(2k2)ε_2 = 1/2-1/(2k^2)ε2​=1/2−1/(2k2). The (non-adaptive) quantum tester we use was given by a recent work of Bao, Liu, Yao, Ye, and Zhang (SOSA 2026). We slightly adapt their analysis to show that it holds in the above parameter regime. On the other hand, our classical lower bound requires substantial new ideas. Inspired by the lower bound techniques of Chen and Patel (FOCS 2023), we introduce a new hard distribution of ``yes'' instances (i.e., instances with distance at most ε1ε_1ε1​ to kkk-juntas) that is based on planting an ``approximate-junta'' as follows: we randomly pick kkk out of nnn coordinates, and for each fixing of the kkk coordinates, the 2n−k2^{n-k}2n−k values in the restricted subcube are drawn randomly except for the set of points in an error-correcting code on which we place the same random bit. We show that this distribution is much closer to kkk-juntas than the uniform distribution, but on the other hand, they are indistinguishable with respect to any classical algorithm making ko(log⁡k)k^{o(\log k)}ko(logk) queries.