We systematically analyze the conceptual structure of modern physics, i.e., the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, from the perspective of Leibniz’s three basic principles of identity, sufficient reason and continuity. We find that Leibniz’s way of thinking can still provide insight into fundamental problems of physics, such as the nature of physical constants, the relation between physical invariances and covariant coordinate representations, the role of the Planck scale and quantum mechanical indeterminism and the measurement problem. Leibniz himself could not possess all those insights, simply because physics was not yet sufficiently developed then, but he had already forged some conceptual tools with which some fundamental problems of modern physics can be addressed.
We systematically analyze the conceptual structure of modern physics, i.e., the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, from the perspective of Leibniz’s three basic principles of identity, sufficient reason and continuity. We find that Leibniz’s way of thinking can still provide insight into fundamental problems of physics, such as the nature of physical constants, the relation between physical invariances and covariant coordinate representations, the role of the Planck scale and quantum mechanical indeterminism and the measurement problem. Leibniz himself could not possess all those insights, simply because physics was not yet sufficiently developed then, but he had already forged some conceptual tools with which some fundamental problems of modern physics can be addressed.
The present article is written by a theoretical physicist who, for some time, has endeavored to trace the origin of the concepts and principles of quantum theory to an empirical background broader than that afforded by delicate optical and mechanical experiments on a microphysical scale involving the microconstant h. In particular he tried to reduce the dominant role of probability in modern physics to irrefutable evidence of a quite general nature. As long as quantum probability is deduced from experience with seemingly uncontrollable micro-mechanisms—think of radioactive disintegration as the most typical example—there will always be the objection that one day we still may find a hidden causality behind those small scale gambling devices called atoms, although one example of an exactly predictable atomic event would make present-day quantum theory untenable. In order to dislodge the remaining classicists from their fortress of doubt one may try to show that quantum probability is not an alibi for a temporary impotence of predicting microphysical events, but is a positive conclusion drawn from experience of a most general type, namely, from the principle of continuity, the basic tenet of the philosophy of Leibniz.
The mathematician plays a game in which he himself invents the rules, while the physicist plays a game in which the rules are provided by nature, but as time goes on, it becomes increasingly evident that the rules which the mathematician finds interesting are the same as those which nature has chosen. (Paul A. M. Dirac) As described in Chapter 5, classical ( Newtonian ) mechanics is centered around Hamilton's principle and the associated Newton's second law, particularly as applied to statics and dynamics of nondeformable (discrete) and deformable (continuous) bodies. Such systems are typically of O (1) size operating at O (1) speeds. Modern physics generally refers to branches of physics that have arisen since Einstein's relativity theory in the early part of the twentieth century, including special relativity, general relativity, and quantum mechanics, for example. Modern physics addresses physical phenomena that occur at very small sizes, such as atoms, or very large sizes, such as galaxies, and/or very high speeds close to the speed of light. We focus on the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, both of which reduce to the classical mechanics limit that has occupied our considerations thus far. Relativity reduces to classical mechanics when υ ≪ c , where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, and υ is a characteristic velocity of the system; quantum mechanics reduces to classical mechanics when length scales dominant within the system are much larger than Planck's universal constant ħ.
The philosophical Framework of modern physics puts forward a philosophical solution to the contradiction between relativity theory and quantum mechanics theory, aiming to break through the restriction of material philosophy on human thought and solve the artificial contradiction generated by material philosophy. This scheme is the physical principle of natural philosophy. Newton discovered the mathematical principles of natural philosophy, he expressed the principles of the universe’s natural philosophy through mathematics, discovering universal gravitation, the mutual perception and motion of material mass. This line of thought continued with the discovery of electromagnetism by Faraday and Maxwell, and quantum mechanics by Einstein, Planck, Born, Bohr, and Dirac many scientists. This represents the completion of the great natural theology of the universe, a credit to these great scientists. However, we have not recognized this as natural theology. Newton and Leibniz jointly discovered absolute space, but due to insufficient scientific information, we lost an opportunity. Today, modern physics has given us another chance; by combining scientific information with the Cosmic origin principles left by our ancestors, we can understand absolute space. Starting with an analysis of the “theoretical contradictions” in quantum mechanics and relativity, reflecting on the concept and essence of physics, and recognizing the Cosmic origin principle is the natural philosophy principle of physics.
Abstract Quantum field theory (QFT) is the union of quantum mechanics and Einstein’ s special theory of relativity. QFT is the most fundamental physical theory and provides the answers to questions about the basic structure of the physical world. However, the way QFT describes the world is so different from the way our senses present it to us that it requires an overhaul of philosophic categories and arguments. How can we know the microscopic world without a satisfactory measurement theory? What are the general conditions of the world that make possible such knowledge? What are the presuppositions of physical theories? Dr.Auyang argues that the current relational substantial debate on space-time is inadequate and the observer-observed distinction in quantum interpretations illusory because they are hampered by philosophical constructs too narrow to accommodate the complicated structures of modern philosophical theories. Modern physical theories have incorporated many presuppositions of empirical knowledge, and consequently the theories inform us about the general nature of the world and out relation to it, in addition to information about elementary particles. The conceptual structure of QFT is extracted and articulated in commonsense terms, and used to answer many longstanding philosophical questions.
Quantum physics, also known as quantum mechanics, is one of the most profound and successful theories in modern science, fundamentally transforming our understanding of the microscopic world. It governs the behavior of matter and energy at atomic and subatomic scales, where classical physics fails to provide accurate explanations. This review paper presents a comprehensive examination of the fundamental concepts of quantum physics, including wave–particle duality, quantum states, superposition, uncertainty principle, quantum measurement, entanglement, and quantum dynamics. The paper traces the historical development of quantum theory, reviews seminal contributions from key physicists, and analyzes major theoretical frameworks such as Schrödinger’s wave mechanics, Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics, and Dirac’s formalism. A systematic literature review of 25 scholarly sources is conducted to highlight the evolution, interpretations, and applications of quantum concepts. A comparative analysis of classical and quantum physics is provided to emphasize conceptual differences and paradigm shifts. The discussion explores philosophical implications, experimental validations, and emerging applications in quantum computing, cryptography, and quantum technologies. Finally, the paper concludes by summarizing key insights and outlining future directions for research and education in quantum physics.
Abstract The paper addresses the referring problem in quantum mechanics, by spelling out the alternatives with complete or individual concepts (Leibniz; in modern terms: definite descriptive proper names), with directly referential labels (standard formalism of quantum mechanics), and with intuition (Kant). The connection between the way of referring and some metaphysical theses about objects will be explained. Then, the paper intends to make plausible that the Kantian way is the best way for the quantum domain, including quantum field theories.