In quantum mechanics the state vector evolves in a predictable and continuous way, according to the Schrödinger equation; only if a measurement takes place, the Schrödinger evolution is interrupted. Transitions between stationary states (transitions BSS) are accounted for time dependent perturbation theory (TDPT). It is often ignored that this theory requires measurements. As measurements demand either the intervention of an observer or the interaction between the quantum system with a measuring device, billions of observers and/or measuring devices would be necessary at every small corner of the universe where transitions BSS take place. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of their existence. We are thus led to conclude that transitions BSS are the result of causes different from the measurements required in TDPT. In the spontaneous projection approach, the version of quantum mechanics which we uphold, collapses to the stationary states result from the tendency of the system to jump to the eigenstates of the constants of the motion.
In quantum mechanics the state vector evolves in a predictable and continuous way, according to the Schrödinger equation; only if a measurement takes place, the Schrödinger evolution is interrupted. Transitions between stationary states (transitions BSS) are accounted for time dependent perturbation theory (TDPT). It is often ignored that this theory requires measurements. As measurements demand either the intervention of an observer or the interaction between the quantum system with a measuring device, billions of observers and/or measuring devices would be necessary at every small corner of the universe where transitions BSS take place. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of their existence. We are thus led to conclude that transitions BSS are the result of causes different from the measurements required in TDPT. In the spontaneous projection approach, the version of quantum mechanics which we uphold, collapses to the stationary states result from the tendency of the system to jump to the eigenstates of the constants of the motion.
So far in our development of quantum mechanics, we have given very little consideration to problems involving the time dependence of the wave function. This is rather surprising as in classical mechanics it is time-dependent phenomenai.e., dynamics rather than statics-that command most attention. Moreover, most experimental observations necessarily involve some change in the quantity being observed, so we might expect that the successful prediction of experimental results will require a detailed understanding of the way in which a system changes with time. In fact we have already made some implicit assumptions about time dependence and the principal reason why we have got so far without discussing it in detail is that many observed quantum phenomena are associated with sudden discontinuous changes between otherwise stable states. Thus, most of our information concerning the energy levels of atoms has been obtained from measurements of the frequencies of electromagnetic radiation emitted or absorbed as the atom undergoes a transition from one energy eigenstate to another, assuming the correctness of the formula E = }ω, but not considering the mechanism of the transition in any detail. Assumptions concerning time dependence are also implicit in the quantum theory of measurement which refers to the probability of obtaining a particular result following a measurement performed on a system in a given state; thus the state vector of a spinhalf particle changes from being an eigenvector Sˆ z to being one of Sˆ x following a measurement of the latter property using an appropriately oriented Stern-Gerlach apparatus. However, as was pointed out in Chapter 7, and will be discussed further in Chapters 15 and 16, the collapse of the wave function associated with a measurement is not a direct consequence of the time-dependent Schro¨dinger equation.
The apparent dichotomy between quantum jumps on the one hand, and continuous time evolution according to wave equations on the other hand, provided a challenge to Bohr's proposal of quantum jumps in atoms. Furthermore, Schrödinger's time-dependent equation also seemed to require a modification of the explanation for the origin of line spectra due to the apparent possibility of superpositions of energy eigenstates for different energy levels. Indeed, Schrödinger himself proposed a quantum beat mechanism for the generation of discrete line spectra from superpositions of eigenstates with different energies. However, these issues between old quantum theory and Schrödinger's wave mechanics were correctly resolved only after the development and full implementation of photon quantization. The second quantized scattering matrix formalism reconciles quantum jumps with continuous time evolution through the identification of quantum jumps with transitions between different sectors of Fock space. The continuous evolution of quantum states is then recognized as a sum over continually evolving jump amplitudes between different sectors in Fock space. In today's terminology, this suggests that linear combinations of scattering matrix elements are epistemic sums over ontic states. Insights from the resolution of the dichotomy between quantum jumps and continuous time evolution therefore hold important lessons for modern research both on interpretations of quantum mechanics and on the foundations of quantum computing. They demonstrate that discussions of interpretations of quantum theory necessarily need to take into account field quantization. They also demonstrate the limitations of the role of wave equations in quantum theory, and caution us that superpositions of quantum states for the formation of qubits may be more limited than usually expected.
It is considered to re-formulate quantum theory as it appears: A theory of continuous and causal time evolution, interrupted by discontinuous and stochastic jumps. To develop the (missing) theory of jumps a heuristic-phenomenological approach is suggested. Relying on a global reduction process, a hypothesis is introduced postulating spontaneous collapse of superpositions of states which describe spontaneous absorption or emission. The collapse probability determines a mean collapse time τc=bℏ/△E, where b is a dimensionless constant and △E is the difference in energy distribution between alternative branches. Ramsey atomic beam spectroscopy yields a lower bound on b and avalanche photodiodes give an upper bound, such that 1.35⋅1011<b<3.8⋅1021. Ample opportunities for experimental improvements exist.
Abstract This book describes one approach to resolving the ‘measurement problem’ of standard quantum theory (SQT), by changing the Schrodinger equation’s evolution of the wave function. The wave function of SQT does not describe reality. For example, the wave function corresponding to a completed experiment is the sum of terms describing the different experimental outcomes whereas one of these outcomes is what appears in Nature, The rules of SQT respond to this deficiency by imposing an ill-defined ‘collapse postulate.’ The prior smooth evolution of the wave function according to Schrodinger’s equation is replaced by an abrupt ‘jump’ to one of the outcomes. When, why, how are unanswered questions. I have added a term to Schrodinger’s equation, obtaining a theory (which I named the ‘Continuous Spontaneous Localization’ theory, or CSL) that answers these questions. The term has a random field in it: each field makes the sum of terms evolve to one of the terms. The collection of all possible fields produces the (Born rule) probabilistic predictions of SQT. Thus, CSL does something SQT does not: it describes the occurrence of events. But, it is a different theory than SQT, so it predicts different results for some carefully crafted experiments. CSL has now existed for over three decades. While no experiment as yet has proven CSL true, no experiment has conflicted with it either. In this book I have aimed to give a clear exposition of CSL and its consequences, accessible to anyone who has studied SQT.
Schrödinger's cat states A prerequisite to getting quantitative information on the microscopic world is the existence of measuring apparatuses that indicate definite measuring results.The idea that a pointer of a measuring device is itself in an indeterminate state waiting for someone to make the wavefunction for the combined system (object + measuring apparatus) collapse by simply having a look on the apparatus, thus reading it out, appears absurd. I think, there is no doubt that measuring devices will behave like other objects in the macroscopic world in which there is no place for ‘intrinsic’ uncertainty. Actually, this fact becomes questionable, at least it needs further theoretical investigation, when it is claimed that the quantum mechanical description applies also to macroscopic bodies, in particular measuring devices. (There are physicists who do not shrink back from attributing a single wavefunction even to the whole universe!) The dilemma originates from the quantum mechanical rule following from the linearity of the Schrödinger equation, that a pure quantum state remains a pure quantum state during its evolution. So, assuming that both the microscopic system to be observed and the measuring apparatus are initially in a pure state each, the combined system (object + measuring apparatus) will still be in a pure state after the interaction has taken place. Hence one will need ‘someone’ to bring about the collapse of the wavefunction. (In a realistic approach to this problem, the agent is recognized to be the environment with its virtually infinite number of degrees of freedom.) Schrödinger, being fully aware of this dilemma, illustrated it ingeniously through a fictitious ‘diabolic device’.
According to cosmological inflation, the inhomogeneities in our Universe are of quantum-mechanical origin. This scenario is phenomenologically very appealing as it solves the puzzles of the standard hot big bang model and naturally explains why the spectrum of cosmological perturbations is almost scale invariant. It is also an ideal playground to discuss deep questions among which is the quantum measurement problem in a cosmological context. Although the large squeezing of the quantum state of the perturbations and the phenomenon of decoherence explain many aspects of the quantum-to-classical transition, it remains to understand how a specific outcome can be produced in the early Universe, in the absence of any observer. The continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) approach to quantum mechanics attempts to solve the quantum measurement question in a general context. In this framework, the wave function collapse is caused by adding new nonlinear and stochastic terms to the Schr\"odinger equation. In this paper, we apply this theory to inflation, which amounts to solving the CSL parametric oscillator case. We choose the wave function collapse to occur on an eigenstate of the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable and discuss the corresponding modified Schr\"odinger equation. Then, we compute the power spectrum of the perturbations and show that it acquires a universal shape with two branches, one which remains scale invariant and one with nS=4, a spectral index in obvious contradiction with the cosmic microwave background anisotropy observations. The requirement that the non-scale-invariant part be outside the observational window puts stringent constraints on the parameter controlling the deviations from ordinary quantum mechanics. Due to the absence of a CSL amplification mechanism in field theory, this also has the consequence that the collapse mechanism of the inflationary fluctuations is not efficient. Then, we determine the collapse time. On small scales the collapse is almost instantaneous, and we recover exactly the behavior of the CSL harmonic oscillator (a case for which we present new results), whereas, on large scales, we find that the collapse is delayed and can take several e-folds to happen. We conclude that recovering the observational successes of inflation and, at the same time, reaching a satisfactory resolution of the inflationary ``macro-objectification'' issue seems problematic in the framework considered here. This work also provides a complete solution to the CSL parametric oscillator system, a topic we suggest could play a very important role to further constrain the CSL parameters. Our results illustrate the remarkable power of inflation and cosmology to constrain new physics.