Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Quantum Information Science

Making Mistakes Saves the Single Observer’s World of the Extended Wigner’s Friend Experiment

Szymon Łukaszyk

Published Jan 1, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Extended Wigner’s Friend thought experiment, comprising a quantum system containing an agent who draws conclusions upon observing the outcome of a measurement of a quantum state prepared in two nonorthogonal versions by another agent, led its authors to conclude that quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. It has also been proposed that this thought experiment is equivalent to entangled state (Bell-type) experiments. It is argued in this paper that the assumption of the freedom of choice of the first Wigner’s friend regarding how to prepare a quantum state in one of the two available nonorthogonal versions invalidates such equivalence.

DOI
10.4236/jqis.2022.121001

Related papers

Making Mistakes Saves the Single World of the Extended Wigner’s Friend Experiment

Szymon Łukaszyk

Abstract The Extended Wigner’s Friend thought experiment comprising a quantum system containing an agent who draws conclusions, upon observing the outcome of a measurement of a qubit prepared in two non-orthogonal versions by another agent led its authors to conclude that quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. It has also been proposed that this thought experiment is equivalent to coherent entangled state (Bell type) experiments. It is argued in this paper that the assumption of the freedom of choice of the first Wigner’s friend invalidates such equivalency. It is also argued that the assumption of locality (physical space) introduces superfluous identity of indiscernibles metric axiom, which is invalid in quantum domain and generally disproven by the Ugly duckling mathematical theorem.

•Jan 27, 2021•1 citation

A No-go Theorem for Superposed Actions (Making Schrödinger’s Cat Quantum Nonlocal)

Szymon Łukaszyk

The Extended Wigner’s Friend thought experiment, which involves a quantum system with an agent who draws conclusions based on the results of a measurement of a quantum state provided in two nonorthogonal versions by another agent, led its designers to the conclusion that quantum theory cannot consistently explain the use of itself. It has also been suggested that this thought experiment is equivalent to entangled state (Bell-type) experiments. This study indicates that the assumption of the first Wigner's friend's freedom of choice, regarding how to prepare a quantum state in one of the two available nonorthogonal versions, invalidates such equivalence. A no-go theorem for superposed actions is derived on this basis. It is also argued that modeling Wigner-type experiments under the principle of locality, i.e., using enclosed containers modeled as composite, many-body quantum states, is fundamentally wrong as it neglects quantum nonlocality.

arXiv:1801.08537•Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International)•Nov 1, 2022•3 citations

The extended Wigner's friend, many- and single-worlds and reasoning from observation

Andrew Steane

The concept of an isolated system, and Frauchiger and Renner's extended `Wigner's friend' scenario are discussed. It is argued that: (i) it is questionable whether the approximation of the isolated system is valid when measurement-like processes are involved; (ii) one may infer, from Frauchiger and Renner's thought-experiment, and similar thought-experiments, that any interpretation of quantum theory involving *subjective collapse* fails; (iii) this does not distinguish single-world from many-world (relative-state) interpretations of quantum theory; (iv) reasoning from observations has to take into account the possible quantum-erasure of those observations if it is to be valid reasoning; (v) a single-world interpretation is valid if certain kinds of outcome are not quantum-erased in the future.

quant-pharXiv:2605.08375•Foundations of Physics•May 12, 2026•2 citations

A review and analysis of six extended Wigner's friend arguments

David Schmid, Yìlè Yīng, Matthew Leifer

The Wigner's friend thought experiment was intended to illustrate the difficulty one has in describing an agent as a quantum system when that agent performs a measurement. While it does pose a challenge to the orthodox interpretation of quantum theory, most modern interpretations have no trouble in resolving the difficulty. Recently, a number of extensions of Wigner's ideas have been proposed. We provide a gentle introduction to six such arguments, modifying the specifics of many of them so that they are as simple and unified as possible. In particular, we show that all of the arguments hinge on assumptions about correlations between measurement outcomes that are not accessible to any observer, even in principle. We then provide a critical analysis of each argument, focusing especially on how well one can motivate the required assumptions regarding these inaccessible correlations. Although we argue that some of these assumptions are not entirely well-motivated, all of the arguments do shed light on the nature of quantum theory, especially when concerning the description of agents and their measurements.

arXiv:2308.16220•Aug 30, 2023•20 citations

Single-World Theory of the Extended Wigner’s Friend Experiment

Anthony Sudbery

Frauchiger and Renner have recently claimed to prove that “Single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent”. This is contradicted by a construction due to Bell, inspired by Bohmian mechanics, which shows that any quantum system can be modelled in such a way that there is only one “world” at any time, but the predictions of quantum theory are reproduced. This Bell–Bohmian theory is applied to the experiment proposed by Frauchiger and Renner, and their argument is critically examined. It is concluded that it is their version of “standard quantum theory”, incorporating state vector collapse upon measurement, that is not self-consistent.

arXiv:1608.05873•Foundations of Physics•Apr 7, 2017•73 citations

Relations and relativities: A Kantian approach to relational interpretations of quantum theory

Michel Bitbol

Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself », Nature Communications, 9, 3711, 2018 11 Wigner's friend's thought experiment involves two observers.The first (the friend) is locked up in a laboratory, performing a quantum measurement on a physical system whose quantum state is a superposition of two distinct eigenstates of an observable.When the friend has finished the measurement, he obtains as a result one of the two eigenvalues of the observable, and he assigns to his system a new state identical to the eigenstate corresponding to this measured eigenvalue.The second observer (Wigner) is located outside the laboratory, and he only knows one thing about what is happening inside: that his friend is performing the measurement described above.Under such conditions, he is forced to attribute to everything contained in the laboratory (including his friend) a quantum state that extends the superposition beyond the physical system, to his friend himself.The

•Dec 1, 2024•0 citations
The Extended Wigner’s Friend thought experiment, comprising a quantum system containing an agent who draws conclusions upon observing the outcome of a measurement of a quantum state prepared in two nonorthogonal versions by another agent, led its authors to conclude that quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. It has also been proposed that this thought experiment is equivalent to entangled state (Bell-type) experiments. It is argued in this paper that the assumption of the freedom of choice of the first Wigner’s friend regarding how to prepare a quantum state in one of the two available nonorthogonal versions invalidates such equivalence.
Abstract The Extended Wigner’s Friend thought experiment comprising a quantum system containing an agent who draws conclusions, upon observing the outcome of a measurement of a qubit prepared in two non-orthogonal versions by another agent led its authors to conclude that quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. It has also been proposed that this thought experiment is equivalent to coherent entangled state (Bell type) experiments. It is argued in this paper that the assumption of the freedom of choice of the first Wigner’s friend invalidates such equivalency. It is also argued that the assumption of locality (physical space) introduces superfluous identity of indiscernibles metric axiom, which is invalid in quantum domain and generally disproven by the Ugly duckling mathematical theorem.
The Extended Wigner’s Friend thought experiment, which involves a quantum system with an agent who draws conclusions based on the results of a measurement of a quantum state provided in two nonorthogonal versions by another agent, led its designers to the conclusion that quantum theory cannot consistently explain the use of itself. It has also been suggested that this thought experiment is equivalent to entangled state (Bell-type) experiments. This study indicates that the assumption of the first Wigner's friend's freedom of choice, regarding how to prepare a quantum state in one of the two available nonorthogonal versions, invalidates such equivalence. A no-go theorem for superposed actions is derived on this basis. It is also argued that modeling Wigner-type experiments under the principle of locality, i.e., using enclosed containers modeled as composite, many-body quantum states, is fundamentally wrong as it neglects quantum nonlocality.
The concept of an isolated system, and Frauchiger and Renner's extended `Wigner's friend' scenario are discussed. It is argued that: (i) it is questionable whether the approximation of the isolated system is valid when measurement-like processes are involved; (ii) one may infer, from Frauchiger and Renner's thought-experiment, and similar thought-experiments, that any interpretation of quantum theory involving *subjective collapse* fails; (iii) this does not distinguish single-world from many-world (relative-state) interpretations of quantum theory; (iv) reasoning from observations has to take into account the possible quantum-erasure of those observations if it is to be valid reasoning; (v) a single-world interpretation is valid if certain kinds of outcome are not quantum-erased in the future.
The Wigner's friend thought experiment was intended to illustrate the difficulty one has in describing an agent as a quantum system when that agent performs a measurement. While it does pose a challenge to the orthodox interpretation of quantum theory, most modern interpretations have no trouble in resolving the difficulty. Recently, a number of extensions of Wigner's ideas have been proposed. We provide a gentle introduction to six such arguments, modifying the specifics of many of them so that they are as simple and unified as possible. In particular, we show that all of the arguments hinge on assumptions about correlations between measurement outcomes that are not accessible to any observer, even in principle. We then provide a critical analysis of each argument, focusing especially on how well one can motivate the required assumptions regarding these inaccessible correlations. Although we argue that some of these assumptions are not entirely well-motivated, all of the arguments do shed light on the nature of quantum theory, especially when concerning the description of agents and their measurements.
Frauchiger and Renner have recently claimed to prove that “Single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent”. This is contradicted by a construction due to Bell, inspired by Bohmian mechanics, which shows that any quantum system can be modelled in such a way that there is only one “world” at any time, but the predictions of quantum theory are reproduced. This Bell–Bohmian theory is applied to the experiment proposed by Frauchiger and Renner, and their argument is critically examined. It is concluded that it is their version of “standard quantum theory”, incorporating state vector collapse upon measurement, that is not self-consistent.
Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself », Nature Communications, 9, 3711, 2018 11 Wigner's friend's thought experiment involves two observers.The first (the friend) is locked up in a laboratory, performing a quantum measurement on a physical system whose quantum state is a superposition of two distinct eigenstates of an observable.When the friend has finished the measurement, he obtains as a result one of the two eigenvalues of the observable, and he assigns to his system a new state identical to the eigenstate corresponding to this measured eigenvalue.The second observer (Wigner) is located outside the laboratory, and he only knows one thing about what is happening inside: that his friend is performing the measurement described above.Under such conditions, he is forced to attribute to everything contained in the laboratory (including his friend) a quantum state that extends the superposition beyond the physical system, to his friend himself.The