Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of High Dilution Research

Reforming thought.

José Carlos F. Diniz Gama

Published Feb 1, 2022• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This article discusses a proposal for a reform in thinking, grounded on Heisenberg’s principle of uncertanty, Chew’s bootstrap theory and Bohm’s principle of implicated order. By synthetizing all three grounds together, it is concluded that thought ought to be turned to the uncertainty of phenomena. Behind uncertainty lies an implicated order, which mantains the interactive pattern with onself, the others and the world.

DOI
10.51910/ijhdr.v6i18.160

Related papers

Comments on Robinson's thought experiment testing Heisenberg's principle

Ishwar S Singh

The author points out the unphysical assumptions which led Robinson (see ibid., vol.13, p.877, 1980) to conclude the violation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Aug 1, 1981•8 citations

Quantum Foundations

Pedro W. Lamberti, G. M. Bosyk, Sebastián Fortín +1 more

Since its conception 90 years ago, the quantum uncertainty principle introduced by Werner Heisenberg lies behind most important features of quantum physics, and its implications have an impact that goes far beyond the physics community. This book focuses on the quantum uncertainty principle, providing an up-to-date examination of recent developments of its applications in quantum information theory. The book brings together several renowned experts working in the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum information theory. The authors provide different approaches to the study of uncertainty relations and other fundamental aspects of the quantum formalism. Topics addressed include entanglement and Bell inequalities, the application of entropic information measures to the study of uncertainty inequalities, the characterization of deep learning networks in the context of adiabatic quantum computation, and the study of general properties of the set of quantum states. The content of this book will surely benefit both experienced and new researchers specializing in quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics.

MDPI eBooks•Apr 2, 2019•0 citations

Lbe For Quantum Mechanics

Sauro Succi A

Abstract The lattice Boltzmann concepts and applications described so far refer to classical (non-quantum) physics. Whether this limitation is strictly scientific or purely contingental in character, it is difficult to say. However, it appears plausible to speculate that at least part of the LBE assets should be exportable to the quantum world. In principle, this does not even require much of a conceptual jump, since it has been known for a long time that quantum mechanics can be formulated in a fluid dynamic language. This analogy is precisely the stepping stone for this final chapter: stay with us, LBE goes quantum mechanical! Intriguing analogies between quantum mechanics and fluid mechanics have been pointed out since the earliest days of quantum theory [212]. The orthodox tenet is that these analogies are purely formal in character and do not bear upon the basic physics of quantum phenomena. A less orthodox, albeit not minor, stream of thought insists instead that quantum mechanics and notably its philosophical hard-core, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, are nothing but a mirror of our ignorance of the underlying (hidden) microscopic physical level. This leads to the puzzling theory of ‘hidden variables’ which can be traced back to Einstein and subsequently to D. Bohm and others [213]. It is not our intention here to enter this fascinating and still open subject [214]. We turn to a practical question instead: what can the analogy do for us in terms of numerical modeling of evolutionary quantum mechanical phenomena? The question is legitimate because, regardless of its philosophical implications, the fluid analogy certainly provides an intuitive and sound basis to develop numerical methods for time-dependent quantum mechanics. In particular, it appears reasonable to ask whether the advantages brought about by LBE in fluid dynamics can (by means of the fluid analogy) be exported to the context of quantum mechanics. Before we put forward our discrete kinetic theory version of the analogy, it is useful to provide a cursory survey of the main ideas behind the analogy itself. To this end, a short recap of basic notions of quantum mechanics is in order.

•Jun 28, 2001•0 citations

Entanglement of the Uncertainty Principle

Matheus Pereira Lobo

We propose that position and momentum in the uncertainty principle are quantum entangled states.

•Jul 26, 2020•7 citations

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle in Buddhist Philosophical Perspective

Somparn Promtha, Phramaha Pornchai Sirivaro, Pattamawadee Sankheangaew

•Jan 1, 2021•1 citation

Bootstrap’s Monadology. Symmetry and Mirroring Connections between Chew’s Bootstrap Theory and Leibniz’s Monadology

Ramona Ardelean

The scientific paradigm which I rely upon in the framework of this article is quantum mechanics, whose “cognitive revolution” consisted of replacing the classical principle of separability with the principle of nonseparability or global intercorrelation. According to this intercorrelation, highlighted at the subatomic level, the part cannot be separated from the whole, because every part has a global and instantaneous connection with the whole universe. For this reason the foundation of the world cannot be the part (elementary particles), but the whole, which is therefore logically and ontologically prior to the part, i.e., self-consistent. Consequently, the principle of global intercorrelation elucidates and validates some of the oldest philosophical problems and intuitions about the unity or self-consistency of the world. An example in this sense is the bootstrap theory of American physicist Geoffrey Chew, which presents such striking similarities to the metaphysical system of Leibniz's Monadology that the two intertwine and mirror each other, like twin souls, to the extent that it could be stated that if Chew’s bootstrap theory represents the explanatory physical level of Leibniz’s metaphysics, then, analogously, Leibniz’s Monadology represents the explanatory metaphysical level of Chew’s physics.

Balkan Journal of Philosophy•Jan 1, 2022•1 citation
This article discusses a proposal for a reform in thinking, grounded on Heisenberg’s principle of uncertanty, Chew’s bootstrap theory and Bohm’s principle of implicated order. By synthetizing all three grounds together, it is concluded that thought ought to be turned to the uncertainty of phenomena. Behind uncertainty lies an implicated order, which mantains the interactive pattern with onself, the others and the world.
Since its conception 90 years ago, the quantum uncertainty principle introduced by Werner Heisenberg lies behind most important features of quantum physics, and its implications have an impact that goes far beyond the physics community. This book focuses on the quantum uncertainty principle, providing an up-to-date examination of recent developments of its applications in quantum information theory. The book brings together several renowned experts working in the foundations of quantum mechanics and quantum information theory. The authors provide different approaches to the study of uncertainty relations and other fundamental aspects of the quantum formalism. Topics addressed include entanglement and Bell inequalities, the application of entropic information measures to the study of uncertainty inequalities, the characterization of deep learning networks in the context of adiabatic quantum computation, and the study of general properties of the set of quantum states. The content of this book will surely benefit both experienced and new researchers specializing in quantum information theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics.
Abstract The lattice Boltzmann concepts and applications described so far refer to classical (non-quantum) physics. Whether this limitation is strictly scientific or purely contingental in character, it is difficult to say. However, it appears plausible to speculate that at least part of the LBE assets should be exportable to the quantum world. In principle, this does not even require much of a conceptual jump, since it has been known for a long time that quantum mechanics can be formulated in a fluid dynamic language. This analogy is precisely the stepping stone for this final chapter: stay with us, LBE goes quantum mechanical! Intriguing analogies between quantum mechanics and fluid mechanics have been pointed out since the earliest days of quantum theory [212]. The orthodox tenet is that these analogies are purely formal in character and do not bear upon the basic physics of quantum phenomena. A less orthodox, albeit not minor, stream of thought insists instead that quantum mechanics and notably its philosophical hard-core, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, are nothing but a mirror of our ignorance of the underlying (hidden) microscopic physical level. This leads to the puzzling theory of ‘hidden variables’ which can be traced back to Einstein and subsequently to D. Bohm and others [213]. It is not our intention here to enter this fascinating and still open subject [214]. We turn to a practical question instead: what can the analogy do for us in terms of numerical modeling of evolutionary quantum mechanical phenomena? The question is legitimate because, regardless of its philosophical implications, the fluid analogy certainly provides an intuitive and sound basis to develop numerical methods for time-dependent quantum mechanics. In particular, it appears reasonable to ask whether the advantages brought about by LBE in fluid dynamics can (by means of the fluid analogy) be exported to the context of quantum mechanics. Before we put forward our discrete kinetic theory version of the analogy, it is useful to provide a cursory survey of the main ideas behind the analogy itself. To this end, a short recap of basic notions of quantum mechanics is in order.
The scientific paradigm which I rely upon in the framework of this article is quantum mechanics, whose “cognitive revolution” consisted of replacing the classical principle of separability with the principle of nonseparability or global intercorrelation. According to this intercorrelation, highlighted at the subatomic level, the part cannot be separated from the whole, because every part has a global and instantaneous connection with the whole universe. For this reason the foundation of the world cannot be the part (elementary particles), but the whole, which is therefore logically and ontologically prior to the part, i.e., self-consistent. Consequently, the principle of global intercorrelation elucidates and validates some of the oldest philosophical problems and intuitions about the unity or self-consistency of the world. An example in this sense is the bootstrap theory of American physicist Geoffrey Chew, which presents such striking similarities to the metaphysical system of Leibniz's Monadology that the two intertwine and mirror each other, like twin souls, to the extent that it could be stated that if Chew’s bootstrap theory represents the explanatory physical level of Leibniz’s metaphysics, then, analogously, Leibniz’s Monadology represents the explanatory metaphysical level of Chew’s physics.