Waves and particles: the diffraction of electrons

Daniel D. Pollock

Einstein assumed duality between radiation and particles. Experiments involving electrons and diffraction effects are described to illustrate such behaviors. Classical physics and Einstein’s findings unmistakably demonstrated that light possessed both wave and particle properties. The responses of electrons in electric and magnetic fields are evidence for their existence as charged particles. The relationship between particle- and wave-like behavior was given by de Broglie in 1924. The dual nature of electrons was demonstrated experimentally by Davisson and Germer, when studying the diffraction of a stream of electrons. The reflection or diffraction of a beam of electromagnetic radiation can be expected to change its intensity, but changes in its wavelength would not ordinarily be anticipated. Photons and electrons may be described in terms of waves, but this approach has inherent limitations. The greater the attempt that is made to study the nature or behavior of a photon or a particle, the greater will be the uncertainty or error of the measurements.

Chun Wang

The author has worked with high-resolution transmission electron microscope for many years, which provides the most direct evidence of wave-particle duality. This relates to Crookes and J. J. Thomson's cathode rays tubes to determine that electron beams are of particle nature. This also relates to Röntgen's discovery that when an electron beam in the cathode rays tube strikes the glass wall, it produces X-rays with extremely high penetrating power. This behavior is consistent with Maxwell-Lorentz’s electrodynamics that electromagnetic waves must be produced whenever electricity carriers alter their velocity. The wave-particle duality proposed by de Broglie refers to accelerated electron beam, rather than single electron. De Broglie emphasized that the crystallographic diffraction pattern produced by his electron beam was completely consistent with the crystallographic diffraction pattern of von Laue by X-rays, therefore, he proposed that electrons possess wave-particle duality. This is actually the selected area electron diffraction pattern in transmission microscope. It is X-rays, not the waves of the electrons themselves to produce diffraction pattern. He extended this to the wave-particle duality of all matter and light. Schrödinger directly introduced de Broglie's electron beam behavior into electron wave in atoms. It was just at this stage that illogical reasoning occurred, making the quantum theory increasingly difficult to understand.

Jiaqing Yan

The mainstream quantum mechanics uses “probability wave superposition and single-electron self-interference” to explain electron single-slit and double-slit diffraction. This theory deviates from the essential nature of real particle interactions and has fundamental logical flaws. The electron is a negatively charged real particle with a definite physical size and high-frequency transverse oscillation; a single real particle has no physical basis for self-interference. Abandoning the abstract probability wave hypothesis, this paper establishes a complete real-interaction model including electrostatic repulsion deflection, surface electron exchange, collision scattering, microscopic refraction, and barrier diffraction, based on the three-dimensional random transverse oscillation and charge repulsion of electrons. The model uniformly explains the real formation mechanism of electron single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference fringes. This paper proves that in single-electron sequential emission, each electron passes through only one slit; all bright and dark fringes are the statistical result of multiple microscopic interactions between electrons and slit walls or the central barrier. The disappearance of fringes under observation is caused by external disturbance to the inherent oscillation and wall-interaction equilibrium, not by wave function collapse. This paper further clarifies that whether an electron can pass through a slit is determined by its transverse oscillation amplitude, not by wavelength. Amplitude directly corresponds to slit width and is the core controlling variable of diffraction. Meanwhile, if no slit is placed, electrons flying directly to the screen produce no diffraction or interference fringes, proving that electrons themselves have no self-interference ability. Fringes are generated by slit structures, not by intrinsic wave interference of electrons. This study corrects the century-long misunderstanding of electron diffraction and establishes a new microscopic diffraction mechanism consistent with classical real-particle physics.

G.F.S.