By the end of the nineteenth century, tremendous advances had been made in the understanding of the physical world; and classical physics as developed up to that time provided powerful and coherent models for a wide range of phenomena. In order to suggest the range and power of classical physics, this chapter starts by reviewing briefly some areas of classical physics, and pointing out certain assumptions about the world and about measurement which underlie and are reflected in classical physics. It then outlines, as an extension of classical physics and as part of pre-quantum physics, aspects of the theory of relativity. The remainder of the chapter explains why the reasonable and common-sense views of classical physics had to be discarded; and gives some understanding of the historical development of quantum physics and of the refutations of common-sense views involved.
By the end of the nineteenth century, tremendous advances had been made in the understanding of the physical world; and classical physics as developed up to that time provided powerful and coherent models for a wide range of phenomena. In order to suggest the range and power of classical physics, this chapter starts by reviewing briefly some areas of classical physics, and pointing out certain assumptions about the world and about measurement which underlie and are reflected in classical physics. It then outlines, as an extension of classical physics and as part of pre-quantum physics, aspects of the theory of relativity. The remainder of the chapter explains why the reasonable and common-sense views of classical physics had to be discarded; and gives some understanding of the historical development of quantum physics and of the refutations of common-sense views involved.
In this chapter we shall first summarize some conceptual and formal features of classical mechanics (Sec. 1.1). Modern physics started with the works of Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton from which classical mechanics, one of the most beautiful and solid intellectual buildings of the human history, came out. The architecture of classical mechanics was developed between the end of the eighteenth century and the second half of the nineteenth century, and its present form is largely due to Lagrange, Jacobi, and Hamilton. As we shall see in this chapter, classical mechanics is built upon the requirement of determinism, a rather complex assumption which is far from being obvious. In Sec. 1.2 we shall present the two main conceptual features of quantum mechanics on the basis of an ideal interferometry experiment: the superposition principle and the principle of complementarity. In Sec. 1.3 a first formal treatment of quantum-mechanical states is developed: quantum states are represented by vectors in a space that turns out to be a Hilbert space. In Sec. 1.4 the significance of probability for quantum mechanics is explained briefly: we will show that probability is not just an ingredient of quantum mechanics, but is rather an intrinsic feature of the theory. Furthermore, we shall see that quantum probability is not ruled by Kolmogorov axioms of classical probability. Finally, we discuss the main evidences which have historically revealed the necessity of a departure from classical mechanics.
Along with the exciting experiments that changed the face of physics in the twentieth century, work proceeded feverishly on the theoretical side to rebuild the conceptual world that had been severely shaken. Sometimes the theorists lagged behind the experimentalists, and certain experimental results waited for several years to be explained. And sometimes experiment lagged behind theory, and a new theoretical model waited for years to be verified experimentally. Two great theories left their mark on physics in this century: the theory of relativity, and quantum mechanics. In this chapter we shall briefly review the main ideas of these theories which are vital for the understanding of the atomic world. The theory of relativity The theory of relativity was formulated by the great physicist Albert Einstein. The first part of it (and the important one for us) — the special theory of relativity — was published in 1905, and sprang from the need to explain a puzzling question that exercised the physicists of the nineteenth century: why was it impossible to alter the speed of light, which remained constant (299 792.5 kilometres per second) even when the detector was moving relative to the source of light? In contrast to other physicists, Einstein did not try to explain this phenomenon.
By the end of the nineteenth century all the important elements of classical physics were fully mature. Newton's Laws had been applied with success to everything from industrial machines to planetary orbits. Classical thermodynamics had extended energy conservation arguments into thermal processes, and scientists including J. Willard Gibbs and Ludwig Boltzmann had developed the statistical interpretation of entropy. James Clerk Maxwell had explained all electromagnetic phenomena, from AC generators/motors to light, with the four Maxwell's equations and three material-dependent constitutive relations. There was serious discussion that physics was on the verge of being “finished” – becoming a closed system of knowledge like classical geometry with only essentially routine tasks left of determining how the known laws could be applied to engineering problems. Yet by 1930 the foundations of mechanics, electromagnetics, and atomic-scale systems had been shaken to the core by the new revolutions in the Theory of Relativity, the photon picture of light, and quantum physics. We are still reaping the benefits of the application of these new scientific paradigms in our technology today, including semiconductor electronic devices, lasers, and GPS systems. But the description of reality that these theories provide is still deeply anti-intuitive and disturbing. Nevertheless, quantum physics is one of the most extensively experimentally verified theories that we know. Even when quantum theory and common sense seem to diverge, quantum theory gives the right answers when tested by experiment. In the next chapter we will develop the framework of quantum theory that has been so successful when people “shut up and calculate,” as one scientist suggested as the way through the philosophical thicket of quantum physics. But in this chapter, we will spend a brief time considering the historical development and continuing paradoxical implications of quantum theory. The photoelectric effect and photons In 1905, Albert Einstein, who was a key figure in the revolution of modern physics, was working as a clerk in the patent office in Zurich, Switzerland. Einstein had finished his studies in physics, but had not obtained a coveted position as a university professor. He was intensely interested in the latest developments in classical physics and was aware of a few of the remaining loose ends that were resisting explanation in the classical model.
Quantum mechanics is essentially a 20th century development that is based on a number of observations that defied classical explanations. While some of these experiments have semiclassical explanations, the triumph of quantum mechanics is that it gives precise verification for an overwhelming number of experimental observations. Its extensions into relativistic quantum mechanics through quantum electrodynamics (QED), electro-weak theory, and quantum chromodynamics (QCD) have led us to the Standard Model of today. While the number of unanswered questions remains approximately constant at each stage of development, the number of answered questions that relate theory with experiment continues to grow rapidly. In this chapter, some of the historical landmarks in the development of the theory are noted. The resolution of the dilemmas presented by classical theory will be dealt with in later chapters, but these are listed to motivate the break from classical mechanics. Because of the apparently unphysical nature of the postulates upon which quantum mechanics is founded, we supply motivation and justification for this break. In the first part of this chapter, we will review some of the experiments that confounded classical theory, and then introduce a formalism that provides some rationale for the postulates upon which quantum mechanics is based. In the end, these postulates will stand on their own.
This chapter begins with a brief outline of some of the key motivations for considering a quantum theory: the early attempts to determine the spectral distribution of energy density of black bodies; stability of atoms and molecules; specific heats of solids; interference and diffraction of light beams; polarization of photons. The experimental foundations of wave mechanics are then presented in detail, but in a logical order quite different from its historical development: photo-emission of electrons by metallic surfaces, X- and γ-ray scattering from gases, liquids and solids, interference experiments, atomic spectra and the Bohr hypotheses, the experiment of Franck and Hertz, the Bragg experiment, diffraction of electrons by a crystal of nickel (Davisson and Germer), and measurements of position and velocity of an electron. The need for a quantum theory In the second half of the nineteenth century it seemed that the laws of classical mechanics, developed by the genius of Newton, Lagrange, Hamilton, Jacobi and Poincaré, the Maxwell theory of electromagnetic phenomena and the laws of classical statistical mechanics could account for all known physical phenomena. Still, it became gradually clear, after several decades of experimental and theoretical work, that one has to formulate a new kind of mechanics, which reduces to classical mechanics in a suitable limit, and makes it possible to obtain a consistent description of phenomena that cannot be understood within the classical framework. It is now appropriate to present a brief outline of this new class of phenomena, the systematic investigation of which is the object of the following sections and of chapters 4 and 14.
The early twentieth century was a revolutionary time in the history of physics. People often think of Einstein's special theory of relativity of 1905, which changed our conceptions of time and space. But among physicists, quantum mechanics is usually regarded as an even more radical change in our thinking about the physical world. Quantum mechanics, which was developed between 1900 and 1926, began as a theory of atoms and light but has now become the framework in terms of which all basic physical theories are expected to be cast. We need quantum ideas not only to understand atoms, molecules, and elementary particles, but also to understand the electronic properties of solids and even certain astronomical phenomena such as the stability of white dwarf stars. The theory was radical in part because it introduced probabilistic behavior as a fundamental aspect of the world, but even more because it seems to allow mutually exclusive situations to exist simultaneously in a “quantum superposition.” We will see later that the possibility of quantum superposition is largely responsible for a quantum computer's distinctive advantage over an ordinary computer. The present chapter is devoted to introducing the basic principles of quantum mechanics. There are essentially four components of the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. We need to know how to represent (i) states, (ii) measurements, (iii) reversible transformations, and (iv) composite systems. We will develop the first three in stages, starting with a very simple case – linear polarization of photons – and working toward the most general case.