Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Princeton University Press eBooks

Nonlocality and Superluminal Signals

Published Sep 14, 2021• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv1t1kfsw.15

Related papers

Chapter Eleven Nonlocality and Superluminal Signals

G. C. Ghirardi

Princeton University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2005•0 citations

Nonlocality and superluminal signal-velocity in photonic tunnelling

Günter Nimtz, Astrid Haibel

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

A Note on Entanglement, Nonlocality, and Superluminal Signaling

Luiz Carlos Ryff

An alternative approach to "entanglement, nonlocality, and superluminal signaling" is advocated. It is inspired on Faraday's way of viewing physics.

arXiv:1308.5690•Aug 26, 2013•0 citations

Superluminal signaling with nonlocal boxes

S. Aravinda, R. Srikanth

arXiv:1111.2593•Nov 10, 2011•0 citations

Superluminal signals: an engineer's perspective

Thilo Sauter

Physics Letters A•Apr 1, 2001•15 citations

Entanglement, Nonlocality, Superluminal Signaling and Cloning

G. C. Ghirardi

The paper is a Chapter of a book. In it an exhaustive review of the proposals to send faster than light signals resorting to quantum nonlocality and the reduction process is presented, together with a critical analysis and rebuttal of all proposals. The most interesting part of the Chapter is the one in which the problem of quantum cloning is discussed. Actually, a proposal of superluminal signaling based on an hypothetical cloning machine has been presented by N. Herbert. The proposal does not work just because of the assumption that one can clone nonorthogonal states. The fact that such a machine is incompatible with quantum theory (i.e., the so-called No-Cloning Theorem) has been proved, for the first time, by the author of the present chapter in his referee's report to Herbert's paper. In the final part of the paper some recent (different but similarly not correct) proposals are analyzed and the reasons for which they are basically wrong are presented.

arXiv:1305.2305•InTech eBooks•Apr 3, 2013•12 citations
The paper is a Chapter of a book. In it an exhaustive review of the proposals to send faster than light signals resorting to quantum nonlocality and the reduction process is presented, together with a critical analysis and rebuttal of all proposals. The most interesting part of the Chapter is the one in which the problem of quantum cloning is discussed. Actually, a proposal of superluminal signaling based on an hypothetical cloning machine has been presented by N. Herbert. The proposal does not work just because of the assumption that one can clone nonorthogonal states. The fact that such a machine is incompatible with quantum theory (i.e., the so-called No-Cloning Theorem) has been proved, for the first time, by the author of the present chapter in his referee's report to Herbert's paper. In the final part of the paper some recent (different but similarly not correct) proposals are analyzed and the reasons for which they are basically wrong are presented.