Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Oxford University Press eBooks

Modern concepts in physics

Simon A. Weissman

Published Jan 1, 1971• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Modern Physics

C. Becchi, Massimo D’Elia

Unitext•Jan 1, 2010•2 citations

Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Modern Physics

C. Becchi, Massimo D’Elia

Unitext•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Modern Physics

C. Becchi, Massimo D’Elia

Undergraduate lecture notes in physics•Aug 28, 2015•2 citations

Introduction to Modern Physics

Nature•Feb 1, 1935•13 citations

A Study of Time in Modern Physics

Peter William Evans

This thesis is a study of the notion of time in modern physics, consisting of two parts. Part I takes seriously the doctrine that modern physics should be treated as the primary guide to the nature of time. To this end, it offers an analysis of the various conceptions of time that emerge in the context of various physical theories and, furthermore, an analysis of the relation between these conceptions of time and the more orthodox philosophical views on the nature of time. In Part II I explore the interpretation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in light of the suggestion that an overly Newtonian conception of time might be contributing to some of the difficulties that we face in interpreting the quantum mechanical formalism. In particular, I argue in favour of introducing backwards-in-time causal influences as part of an alternative conception of time that is consistent with the picture of reality that arises in the context of the quantum formalism. Moreover, I demonstrate that this conception of time can already be found in a particular formulation of classical mechanics. One might see that one of the central themes of Part II originates from a failure to heed properly the doctrine of Part I: study into the nature of time should be guided by modern physics and thus we should be careful not to insert a preconceived Newtonian conception of time unwittingly into our interpretation of the quantum mechanical formalism. Thus, whereas Part I is intended as a demonstration of methodology with respect to the study of time, Part II in a sense explores a confusion that can be seen as arising in the absence of this methodology.

•Jan 1, 2011•1 citation

Concepts of Modern Physics - The Haifa Lectures

Mendel Sachs

Philosophy of Science Classical Precursors for the Concepts of Modern Physics Nineteenth-Century Physics: Atomism and Continuity Early Anomalies and Elementary Particles From the Old Quantum Theory to Quantum Mechanics Quantum Mechanics: Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics and the Copenhagen School Concepts of the Theory of Relativity From Special to General Relativity The Universe Conflicts in the Foundations of the Quantum and Relativity Theories.

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Jan 1, 2007•3 citations
This thesis is a study of the notion of time in modern physics, consisting of two parts. Part I takes seriously the doctrine that modern physics should be treated as the primary guide to the nature of time. To this end, it offers an analysis of the various conceptions of time that emerge in the context of various physical theories and, furthermore, an analysis of the relation between these conceptions of time and the more orthodox philosophical views on the nature of time. In Part II I explore the interpretation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in light of the suggestion that an overly Newtonian conception of time might be contributing to some of the difficulties that we face in interpreting the quantum mechanical formalism. In particular, I argue in favour of introducing backwards-in-time causal influences as part of an alternative conception of time that is consistent with the picture of reality that arises in the context of the quantum formalism. Moreover, I demonstrate that this conception of time can already be found in a particular formulation of classical mechanics. One might see that one of the central themes of Part II originates from a failure to heed properly the doctrine of Part I: study into the nature of time should be guided by modern physics and thus we should be careful not to insert a preconceived Newtonian conception of time unwittingly into our interpretation of the quantum mechanical formalism. Thus, whereas Part I is intended as a demonstration of methodology with respect to the study of time, Part II in a sense explores a confusion that can be seen as arising in the absence of this methodology.