Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Boston studies in the philosophy of science

On the Neutral Status of QM in the Dispute of Realism vs. Anti-Realism

Hong Dingguo

Published Jan 1, 1996• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-015-8638-2_22

Related papers

The Bohr-Einstein Debate and the Philosophers’ Debate over Realism versus Anti-Realism

Henry J. Folse

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1996•3 citations

Quantum theory and the logic of anti-realism

Christopher Norris

Routledge eBooks•Nov 1, 2002•0 citations

Realism and quantum mechanics

Hans Primas

Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics•Jan 1, 1995•29 citations

Local realism vs quantum mechanics with entangled neutral kaons

A. Bramòn, Gianni Garbarino

PoS•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Realism and Quantum Mechanics

G. C. Ghirardi

BRILL eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•1 citation

Truth vs. Progress Realism about Spin

Juha T. Saatsi

Scientific realism about spin is easily motivated. But what does it amount to? To answer this question, Chapter 3 contrasts in general terms two epistemological conceptions of realism—truth-content vs. progress realism—before problematizing truth-content realism in the context of quantum physics. After articulating the challenge faced by truth-content realism, the chapter argues that progress realism avoids it, offering a stable middle ground between anti-realism and traditional truth-content realism.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Feb 27, 2020•23 citations
Scientific realism about spin is easily motivated. But what does it amount to? To answer this question, Chapter 3 contrasts in general terms two epistemological conceptions of realism—truth-content vs. progress realism—before problematizing truth-content realism in the context of quantum physics. After articulating the challenge faced by truth-content realism, the chapter argues that progress realism avoids it, offering a stable middle ground between anti-realism and traditional truth-content realism.