Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Generalized states and measuring processes for continuous observables

Shuichi Matsumoto, 修一 松本

Published Feb 25, 1993• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

An extension of the concept of physical state is introduced. It is shown that if we accept all the "generalized states" as initial states of an apparatus, then we can circumvent the Ozawa's theorem which rules out the existence of repeatable measuring processes for continuous observables. A generalization of the Wigner-Araki- Yanase theorem is argued.

Related papers

Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables

Masanao Ozawa

The purpose of this paper is to provide a basis of theory of measurements of continuous observables. We generalize von Neumann’s description of measuring processes of discrete quantum observables in terms of interaction between the measured system and the apparatus to continuous observables, and show how every such measuring process determines the state change caused by the measurement. We establish a one-to-one correspondence between completely positive instruments in the sense of Davies and Lewis and the state changes determined by the measuring processes. We also prove that there are no weakly repeatable completely positive instruments of nondiscrete observables in the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, so that there are no measuring processes of nondiscrete observables whose state changes satisfy the repeatability hypothesis. A proof of the Wigner–Araki–Yanase theorem on the nonexistence of repeatable measurements of observables not commuting conserved quantities is given in our framework. We also discuss the implication of these results for the recent results due to Srinivas and due to Mercer on measurements of continuous observables.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 1984•503 citations

Wigner-Araki-Yanase Theorem in General Theory of Quantum Measurement

Andrzej Łuczak

A general form of the Wigner-Araki-Yanase theorem is proved in the framework of quantum measurement theory based on the notion of instrument.

Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Sep 1, 2016•3 citations

QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS CONSTRAINED BY SYMMETRIES

Paul Busch, Leon Loveridge

We revisit the theorem of Wigner, Araki and Yanase (WAY) describing limitations to repeatable quantum measurements that arise from the presence of conservation laws. We will review a strengthening of this theorem by exhibiting and discussing a condition that has hitherto not been identified as a relevant factor. We will also show that an extension of the theorem to continuous variables such as position and momentum can be obtained if the degree of repeatability is suitably quantified.

arXiv:1303.6536•WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 14, 2013•3 citations

Conditional Probability and A Posteriori States in Quantum Mechanics

Masanao Ozawa

In order to develop a statistical theory of quantum measurements including continuous observables, a concept of a posteriori states is introduced, which generalizes the notion of regular conditional probability distributions in classical probability theory. Its statistical interpretation in measuring processes is discussed and its existence is proved. As an application, we also give a complete proof of the Davies-Lewis conjecture that there are no (weakly) repeatable instruments for non-discrete observables in the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, using the notion of a posteriori states.

Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences•Apr 30, 1985•99 citations

On the general quantum theory of measurement

Arthur I. Fine

We use the term ‘measurement’ to refer to the interaction between an object and an apparatus on the basis of which information concerning the initial state of the object may be obtained from information on the resulting state of the apparatus. The quantum theory of measurement is a quantum theoretic investigation of such interactions in order to analyse the correlations between object and apparatus that measurement must establish. Although there is a sizeable literature on quantum measurements there appear to be just two sorts of interactions that have been employed. There are the ‘disturbing’ interactions consistent with the analysis of Landau and Peierls (8) as developed by Pauli (11) and by Landau and Lifshitz (7), and there are the ‘non-disturbing’ interactions explicitly set out by von Neumann ((10), chs. 5, 6), and that dominate the literature. In this paper we shall investigate the most general types of interactions that could possibly constitute measurements and provide a precise mathematical characterization (section 2). We shall then examine an interesting subclass, corresponding to Landau's ideas, that contains both of the above sorts of measurements (section 3). Finally, we shall discuss von Neumann measurements explicitly and explore the purported limitations suggested by Wigner(12) and Araki and Yanase (2). We hope, in this way, to provide a comprehensive basis for discussions of quantum measurements.

Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society•Jan 1, 1969•29 citations

The Infinite Apparatus in the Quantum Theory of Measurement

Don Robinson

It has been suggested that the measuring apparatus used to measure quantum systems ought to be idealized as consisting of an infinite number of quantum systems. Let us call this the infinity assumption. The suggestion that we ought to make the infinity assumption has been made in connection with two closely related but distinct problems. One is the problem of determining the importance of the limitations on measurement incorporated into the Wigner-Araki-Yanase quantum theory of measurement. The other is the measurement problem. These problems are not internal to the quantum mechanical formalism. They arise when we obtain particular formal results in applying the quantum mechanical formalism to measurement interactions. The formal results are problematic because they resist explanation. Various authors have claimed that by making the infinity assumption we can neglect the limitations on measurement. Bub (1988) and (1989) claims it allows us to solve the measurement problem. I will argue that both claims are unjustified.

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1990•2 citations
An extension of the concept of physical state is introduced. It is shown that if we accept all the "generalized states" as initial states of an apparatus, then we can circumvent the Ozawa's theorem which rules out the existence of repeatable measuring processes for continuous observables. A generalization of the Wigner-Araki- Yanase theorem is argued.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a basis of theory of measurements of continuous observables. We generalize von Neumann’s description of measuring processes of discrete quantum observables in terms of interaction between the measured system and the apparatus to continuous observables, and show how every such measuring process determines the state change caused by the measurement. We establish a one-to-one correspondence between completely positive instruments in the sense of Davies and Lewis and the state changes determined by the measuring processes. We also prove that there are no weakly repeatable completely positive instruments of nondiscrete observables in the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, so that there are no measuring processes of nondiscrete observables whose state changes satisfy the repeatability hypothesis. A proof of the Wigner–Araki–Yanase theorem on the nonexistence of repeatable measurements of observables not commuting conserved quantities is given in our framework. We also discuss the implication of these results for the recent results due to Srinivas and due to Mercer on measurements of continuous observables.
In order to develop a statistical theory of quantum measurements including continuous observables, a concept of a posteriori states is introduced, which generalizes the notion of regular conditional probability distributions in classical probability theory. Its statistical interpretation in measuring processes is discussed and its existence is proved. As an application, we also give a complete proof of the Davies-Lewis conjecture that there are no (weakly) repeatable instruments for non-discrete observables in the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, using the notion of a posteriori states.
We use the term ‘measurement’ to refer to the interaction between an object and an apparatus on the basis of which information concerning the initial state of the object may be obtained from information on the resulting state of the apparatus. The quantum theory of measurement is a quantum theoretic investigation of such interactions in order to analyse the correlations between object and apparatus that measurement must establish. Although there is a sizeable literature on quantum measurements there appear to be just two sorts of interactions that have been employed. There are the ‘disturbing’ interactions consistent with the analysis of Landau and Peierls (8) as developed by Pauli (11) and by Landau and Lifshitz (7), and there are the ‘non-disturbing’ interactions explicitly set out by von Neumann ((10), chs. 5, 6), and that dominate the literature. In this paper we shall investigate the most general types of interactions that could possibly constitute measurements and provide a precise mathematical characterization (section 2). We shall then examine an interesting subclass, corresponding to Landau's ideas, that contains both of the above sorts of measurements (section 3). Finally, we shall discuss von Neumann measurements explicitly and explore the purported limitations suggested by Wigner(12) and Araki and Yanase (2). We hope, in this way, to provide a comprehensive basis for discussions of quantum measurements.
It has been suggested that the measuring apparatus used to measure quantum systems ought to be idealized as consisting of an infinite number of quantum systems. Let us call this the infinity assumption. The suggestion that we ought to make the infinity assumption has been made in connection with two closely related but distinct problems. One is the problem of determining the importance of the limitations on measurement incorporated into the Wigner-Araki-Yanase quantum theory of measurement. The other is the measurement problem. These problems are not internal to the quantum mechanical formalism. They arise when we obtain particular formal results in applying the quantum mechanical formalism to measurement interactions. The formal results are problematic because they resist explanation. Various authors have claimed that by making the infinity assumption we can neglect the limitations on measurement. Bub (1988) and (1989) claims it allows us to solve the measurement problem. I will argue that both claims are unjustified.