Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

数理科学

Einstein, Bohm, Bellの思考実験と量子力学の非局所性 (発見とひらめき--思考実験を通してみた発見への道程)

邦夫 後藤

Published Jun 1, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Bohmのシース条件の数学解析 (長距離力に支配された多体系自己組織化の統一的理解を目指して)

MASAHIRO SUZUKI

•Apr 1, 2014•0 citations

EPRパラドックスとシュレーディンガーの猫 (発見とひらめき--思考実験を通してみた発見への道程)

宏之 今野

数理科学•Jun 1, 2006•0 citations

Einstein‐Podolsky‐Rosen‐Bohm実験の計算機シミュレーション

Hans A. De Raedt, Kristel F. L. Michielsen

Open Systems & Information Dynamics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

不確定性原理と相補性--ハイゼンベルク,ボーア (発見とひらめき--思考実験を通してみた発見への道程)

宏之 今野

数理科学•Jun 1, 2006•0 citations

Data analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments

Hans A. De Raedt, Fengping Jin, Kristel F. L. Michielsen

Data sets produced by three different Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiments are tested against the hypothesis that the statistics of this data is described by quantum theory. Although these experiments generate data that violate Bell inequalities for suitable choices of the time-coincidence window, the analysis shows that it is highly unlikely that these data sets are compatible with the quantum theoretical description of the EPRB experiment, suggesting that the popular statements that EPRB experiments agree with quantum theory lack a solid scientific basis and that more precise experiments are called for.

•Jan 1, 2013•23 citations

Bohm-Nelson流確率過程量子化によるトンネリング時間の考察 (第3回「非平衡系の統計物理」シンポジウム)

Kentaro Imafuku, 一郎 大場, 由也 山中

物性研究•May 1, 1996•0 citations
Data sets produced by three different Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm (EPRB) experiments are tested against the hypothesis that the statistics of this data is described by quantum theory. Although these experiments generate data that violate Bell inequalities for suitable choices of the time-coincidence window, the analysis shows that it is highly unlikely that these data sets are compatible with the quantum theoretical description of the EPRB experiment, suggesting that the popular statements that EPRB experiments agree with quantum theory lack a solid scientific basis and that more precise experiments are called for.