Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Classical Electromagnetism and the Aharonov–Bohm Phase Shift

Timothy H. Boyer

Published Jun 1, 2000• 24 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1003654508964

Related papers

Physical reality of electromagnetic potentials and the classical limit of the Aharonov–Bohm effect

S. C. Tiwari

arXiv:1611.05304•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•Aug 11, 2017•14 citations

Classical Interaction of a Magnet and a Point Charge: The Classical Electromagnetic Forces Responsible for the Aharonov-Bohm Phase Shift

Timothy H. Boyer

A new classical electromagnetic analysis is presented suggesting that the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift is overwhelmingly likely to arise from a classical lag effect based upon classical electromagnetic forces. The analysis makes use of several aspects of classical electromagnetic theory which are unfamiliar to most physicists, including the Darwin Lagrangian, acceleration-based electric fields, internal electromagnetic momentum in a magnet, and a magnet model involving at least three mutually-interacting particles. Only when the acceleration-based electric forces acting on the passing charge are included do we find consistency with all the relativistic conservation laws: energy, linear momentum, angular momentum, and constant center-of-mass velocity. The electric forces on the passing charge lead to a lag effect which accounts quantitatively for the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift. Thus the classical analysis strongly suggests that the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift (observed when electrons pass a long solenoid which corresponds to a line of magnetic dipoles) is the analogue of the Matteucci-Pozzi phase shift (observed when electrons pass a line of electric dipoles). The classical electromagnetic analysis suggests experiments to distinguish the proposed classical-based lag effect from the presently accepted view that the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift is a quantum topological effect arising from magnetic fluxes in the absence of classical electromagnetic forces.

arXiv:1408.3745•Aug 16, 2014•4 citations

Aharonov–Bohm Effect under Self-duality Condition of Electromagnetic Field

H. Torres‐Silva, A. Domínguez-Pacheco, J. Lopez-Bonilla +1 more

We discuss the situation of Aharonov–Bohm effect under self-duality condition of electromagnetic field, where there is no exact cancellation of the AB(t) phase shift because this phase shift is complex. This means that the time-dependent AB effect, magnetic AB phase shift is not canceled out by a phase shift coming from the Lorentz force with E=−∂tA. Our approach can be compared with the results obtained by other authors which have shown that AB(t) effect vanishes for Abelian electromagnetic plane waves.

Prespacetime journal•May 12, 2016•0 citations

The time-dependent, electromagnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect

Zachary Kertzman, A. Petridis

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Apr 14, 2008•0 citations

Unresolved Classical Electromagnetic Aspects of the Aharonov-Bohm Phase Shift

Timothy H. Boyer, Guillaume Adenier, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov +3 more

The long‐standing controversy regarding the Aharonov‐Bohm phase shift is reviewed. The shifts of both optical and particle interference patterns are summarized. It is pointed out that a line of electric dipoles and a line of magnetic dipoles (a long solenoid) both produce experimentally observed phase shifts similar to that produced by introducing a rectangular block of glass behind one slit of a double‐slit interference pattern; the double‐slit pattern is shifted while the single‐slit envelope remains undisplaced. The quantum explanation for the magnetic interference pattern shift introduced by Aharonov and Bohm in 1959 involves completely different ideas from those suggested by a semiclassical analysis. Experiments planned by Caprez, Barwick, and Batelaan should clarify the connections between classical and quantum theories in connection with the Aharonov‐Bohm phase shift.

arXiv:0709.0661•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•3 citations

Gauge Fields, Electromagnetism and the Bohm-Aharonov Effect

Chen Ning Yang

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Apr 30, 2013•6 citations
A new classical electromagnetic analysis is presented suggesting that the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift is overwhelmingly likely to arise from a classical lag effect based upon classical electromagnetic forces. The analysis makes use of several aspects of classical electromagnetic theory which are unfamiliar to most physicists, including the Darwin Lagrangian, acceleration-based electric fields, internal electromagnetic momentum in a magnet, and a magnet model involving at least three mutually-interacting particles. Only when the acceleration-based electric forces acting on the passing charge are included do we find consistency with all the relativistic conservation laws: energy, linear momentum, angular momentum, and constant center-of-mass velocity. The electric forces on the passing charge lead to a lag effect which accounts quantitatively for the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift. Thus the classical analysis strongly suggests that the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift (observed when electrons pass a long solenoid which corresponds to a line of magnetic dipoles) is the analogue of the Matteucci-Pozzi phase shift (observed when electrons pass a line of electric dipoles). The classical electromagnetic analysis suggests experiments to distinguish the proposed classical-based lag effect from the presently accepted view that the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift is a quantum topological effect arising from magnetic fluxes in the absence of classical electromagnetic forces.
We discuss the situation of Aharonov–Bohm effect under self-duality condition of electromagnetic field, where there is no exact cancellation of the AB(t) phase shift because this phase shift is complex. This means that the time-dependent AB effect, magnetic AB phase shift is not canceled out by a phase shift coming from the Lorentz force with E=−∂tA. Our approach can be compared with the results obtained by other authors which have shown that AB(t) effect vanishes for Abelian electromagnetic plane waves.
The long‐standing controversy regarding the Aharonov‐Bohm phase shift is reviewed. The shifts of both optical and particle interference patterns are summarized. It is pointed out that a line of electric dipoles and a line of magnetic dipoles (a long solenoid) both produce experimentally observed phase shifts similar to that produced by introducing a rectangular block of glass behind one slit of a double‐slit interference pattern; the double‐slit pattern is shifted while the single‐slit envelope remains undisplaced. The quantum explanation for the magnetic interference pattern shift introduced by Aharonov and Bohm in 1959 involves completely different ideas from those suggested by a semiclassical analysis. Experiments planned by Caprez, Barwick, and Batelaan should clarify the connections between classical and quantum theories in connection with the Aharonov‐Bohm phase shift.