Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthese

Can the Decoherence Approach Help to Solve the Measurement Problem?

Osvaldo Frota Pessoa Junior

Published Dec 1, 1997• 54 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1004994303863

Related papers

Can the environment-induced decoherence solve the measurement problem?

Kayoko Awaya

Vistas in Astronomy•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson

Stephen L. Adler

arXiv:quant-ph/0112095•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Jan 21, 2003•159 citations

Decoherence and the measurement problem

Hervé Zwirn C

Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 (FFP14)•Jan 1, 2014•2 citations

The ‘Decoherence’ Approach to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics

Andrew Elby

The decoherence approach to the measurement problem invokes dissipative interactions between a measuring apparatus and its environment to explain, within the context of ‘pure’ quantum mechanics (QM), why such devices appear to possess definite pointer readings. By ‘pure’ QM, I mean Schrödinger evolution with no wavefunction collapse. Several classes of interpretations of pure QM can rely on decoherence. One class is the ‘modal’ interpretations of van Fraassen (1979), Dieks (1989), Healey (1989), and others. Another class is the relative-state and many-world interpretations. I will argue that decoherence cannot help these interpretations address the general metaphysical challenges raised against them. But decoherence can help pick out a ‘special’ basis that determines which observables receive definite values. I'll explore to what extent decoherence rescues the modal (biorthogonal) basis-selection rule, and Zurek's (environmental interaction) basis-selection rule, from the basis degeneracy problem and the imperfect measurement problem.

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1994•16 citations

Why Decoherence has not Solved the Measurement Problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson

Stephen L. Adler

We discuss why, contrary to claims recently made by P. W. Anderson, decoherence has not solved the quantum measurement problem.

•Dec 17, 2001•134 citations

Measurements and Decoherence

Tulsi Dass

A pedagogical and reasonably self-contained introduction to the measurement problems in quantum mechanics and their partial solution by environment-induced decoherence (plus some other important aspects of dcoherence) is given. The point that decoherence does not solve the measurement problems completely is clearly brought out.The relevance of interpretation of quantum mechanics in this context is briefly discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505070•May 10, 2005•16 citations
The decoherence approach to the measurement problem invokes dissipative interactions between a measuring apparatus and its environment to explain, within the context of ‘pure’ quantum mechanics (QM), why such devices appear to possess definite pointer readings. By ‘pure’ QM, I mean Schrödinger evolution with no wavefunction collapse. Several classes of interpretations of pure QM can rely on decoherence. One class is the ‘modal’ interpretations of van Fraassen (1979), Dieks (1989), Healey (1989), and others. Another class is the relative-state and many-world interpretations. I will argue that decoherence cannot help these interpretations address the general metaphysical challenges raised against them. But decoherence can help pick out a ‘special’ basis that determines which observables receive definite values. I'll explore to what extent decoherence rescues the modal (biorthogonal) basis-selection rule, and Zurek's (environmental interaction) basis-selection rule, from the basis degeneracy problem and the imperfect measurement problem.