Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

How do we have to Change Quantum Mechanics in Order to Describe Separated Systems?

Dirk Aerts

Published Jan 1, 1984• 18 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-009-6286-6_24

Related papers

Cluster separability, indispensability of detectors and quantum measurement problem

Petr Hájíček

Careful analysis of cluster separability opens a way to a completely new understanding of preparation and registration procedures for microsystems: they are changes of separation status. An important observation is that quantum mechanics does not specify what happens to systems when they change their separation status. New rules that close this gap can therefore be added without disturbing the logic of quantum mechanics. Another important observation is that registration apparatuses for microsystems must contain detectors and that their readings are signals from detectors. This leads to further restrictions on measurability of observables, especially for macroscopic quantum systems. Beltrametti-Cassinelli-Lahti model is used to show how this approach leads to solution of the measurement problem.

arXiv:1003.4159•Mar 22, 2010•0 citations

Why is it impossible to describe two separated systems in quantum mechanics

Diederik Aerts

•Jan 1, 1981•0 citations

Work required for selective quantum measurement

Eiji Konishi

Abstract In quantum mechanics, we define the measuring system M in a selective measurement by two conditions. Firstly, when we define the measured system S as the system in which the non-selective measurement part acts, M is independent from the measured system S as a quantum system in the sense that any time-dependent process in the total system S + M is divisible into parts for S and M . Secondly, when we can separate S and M from each other without changing the unitary equivalence class of the state of S from that obtained by the partial trace of M , the eigenstate selection in the selective measurement cannot be realized. In order for such a system M to exist, we show that in one selective measurement of an observable of a quantum system S 0 of particles in S , there exists a negative entropy transfer from M to S that can be directly transformed into an amount of Helmholtz free energy of where T is the thermodynamic temperature of the system S . Equivalently, an extra amount of work, , is required to be done by the system M .

arXiv:1610.00757•Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment•Jun 1, 2018•4 citations

The Description of Separated Systems and Quantum Mechanics and a Possible Explanation for the Probabilities of Quantum Mechanics

Dirk Aerts

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•15 citations

On the Work Required for Selective Projective Quantum Measurement

Eiji Konishi

In quantum mechanics, we define the measuring system $M$ in a selective measurement by two conditions. Firstly, when we define the measured system $S$ as the system in which the non-selective measurement part acts, $M$ is independent from the measured system $S$ as a quantum system in the sense that any time-dependent process in the total system $S+M$ is divisible into parts for $S$ and $M$. Secondly, when we can separate $S$ and $M$ from each other without changing the unitary equivalence class of the state of $S$ from that obtained by the partial trace of $M$, the eigenstate selection in the selective measurement cannot be realized. In order for such a system $M$ to exist, we show that in one selective measurement of an observable of a quantum system $S_0$ of particles in $S$, there exists a negative entropy transfer from $M$ to $S$ that can be directly transformed into an amount of Helmholtz free energy of $k_BT$ where $T$ is the thermodynamic temperature of the system $S$. Equivalently, an extra amount of work, $k_BT$, is required to be done by the system $M$.

•Oct 3, 2016•0 citations

Why is it impossible in quantum mechanics to describe two or more separated entities

Diederik Aerts

•Jan 1, 1980•1 citation
Careful analysis of cluster separability opens a way to a completely new understanding of preparation and registration procedures for microsystems: they are changes of separation status. An important observation is that quantum mechanics does not specify what happens to systems when they change their separation status. New rules that close this gap can therefore be added without disturbing the logic of quantum mechanics. Another important observation is that registration apparatuses for microsystems must contain detectors and that their readings are signals from detectors. This leads to further restrictions on measurability of observables, especially for macroscopic quantum systems. Beltrametti-Cassinelli-Lahti model is used to show how this approach leads to solution of the measurement problem.
Abstract In quantum mechanics, we define the measuring system M in a selective measurement by two conditions. Firstly, when we define the measured system S as the system in which the non-selective measurement part acts, M is independent from the measured system S as a quantum system in the sense that any time-dependent process in the total system S + M is divisible into parts for S and M . Secondly, when we can separate S and M from each other without changing the unitary equivalence class of the state of S from that obtained by the partial trace of M , the eigenstate selection in the selective measurement cannot be realized. In order for such a system M to exist, we show that in one selective measurement of an observable of a quantum system S 0 of particles in S , there exists a negative entropy transfer from M to S that can be directly transformed into an amount of Helmholtz free energy of where T is the thermodynamic temperature of the system S . Equivalently, an extra amount of work, , is required to be done by the system M .
In quantum mechanics, we define the measuring system MMM in a selective measurement by two conditions. Firstly, when we define the measured system SSS as the system in which the non-selective measurement part acts, MMM is independent from the measured system SSS as a quantum system in the sense that any time-dependent process in the total system S+MS+MS+M is divisible into parts for SSS and MMM. Secondly, when we can separate SSS and MMM from each other without changing the unitary equivalence class of the state of SSS from that obtained by the partial trace of MMM, the eigenstate selection in the selective measurement cannot be realized. In order for such a system MMM to exist, we show that in one selective measurement of an observable of a quantum system S0S_0S0​ of particles in SSS, there exists a negative entropy transfer from MMM to SSS that can be directly transformed into an amount of Helmholtz free energy of kBTk_BTkB​T where TTT is the thermodynamic temperature of the system SSS. Equivalently, an extra amount of work, kBTk_BTkB​T, is required to be done by the system MMM.