Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Provable Advantage in Quantum Phase Learning via Quantum Kernel Alphatron

Wu Yusen, Bujiao Wu, Jingbo B. Wang, Xiao Yuan

Published Jan 5, 2022• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract The use of quantum computation to speed-up machine learning algorithms is among the most exciting prospective applications in the NISQ era. Here, we focus on the quantum phase learning problem, which is crucially important in understanding many-particle quantum systems. We prove that, under widely believed complexity theory assumptions, quantum phase learning problem cannot be efficiently solved by machine learning algorithms using classical resources and classical data. Whereas using quantum data, we prove the universality of quantum kernel Alphatron in efficiently predicting quantum phases, indicating clear quantum advantages in such learning problems. We numerically benchmark the algorithm for a variety of problems, including recognizing symmetry-protected topological phases and symmetry-broken phases. Our results highlight the capability of quantum machine learning in efficient prediction of quantum phases of many-particle systems.

DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-1179453/v1

Related papers

Provable Advantage in Quantum Phase Learning via Quantum Kernel Alphatron

Yusen Wu, Bujiao Wu, Jingbo Wang +1 more

Abstract The use of quantum computation to speed-up machine learning algorithms is among the most exciting prospective applications in the NISQ era. Here, we focus on the quantum phase learning problem, which is crucially important in understanding many-particle quantum systems. We prove that, under widely believed complexity theory assumptions, quantum phase learning problem cannot be efficiently solved by machine learning algorithms using classical resources and classical data. Whereas using quantum data, we prove the universality of quantum kernel Alphatron in efficiently predicting quantum phases, indicating clear quantum advantages in such learning problems. We numerically benchmark the algorithm for a variety of problems, including recognizing symmetry-protected topological phases and symmetry-broken phases. Our results highlight the capability of quantum machine learning in efficient prediction of quantum phases of many-particle systems.

•Jan 5, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Phase Recognition via Quantum Kernel Methods

Yusen Wu, Bujiao Wu, Jingbo B. Wang +1 more

The application of quantum computation to accelerate machine learning algorithms is one of the most promising areas of research in quantum algorithms. In this paper, we explore the power of quantum learning algorithms in solving an important class of Quantum Phase Recognition (QPR) problems, which are crucially important in understanding many-particle quantum systems. We prove that, under widely believed complexity theory assumptions, there exists a wide range of QPR problems that cannot be efficiently solved by classical learning algorithms with classical resources. Whereas using a quantum computer, we prove the efficiency and robustness of quantum kernel methods in solving QPR problems through Linear order parameter Observables. We numerically benchmark our algorithm for a variety of problems, including recognizing symmetry-protected topological phases and symmetry-broken phases. Our results highlight the capability of quantum machine learning in predicting such quantum phase transitions in many-particle systems.

arXiv:2111.07553•Quantum•Apr 17, 2023•38 citations

Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems

Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, Giacomo Torlai +2 more

Classical machine learning (ML) provides a potentially powerful approach to solving challenging quantum many-body problems in physics and chemistry. However, the advantages of ML over traditional methods have not been firmly established. In this work, we prove that classical ML algorithms can efficiently predict ground-state properties of gapped Hamiltonians after learning from other Hamiltonians in the same quantum phase of matter. By contrast, under a widely accepted conjecture, classical algorithms that do not learn from data cannot achieve the same guarantee. We also prove that classical ML algorithms can efficiently classify a wide range of quantum phases. Extensive numerical experiments corroborate our theoretical results in a variety of scenarios, including Rydberg atom systems, two-dimensional random Heisenberg models, symmetry-protected topological phases, and topologically ordered phases.

arXiv:2106.12627•Science•Sep 22, 2022•230 citations

Quantum Alphatron: quantum advantage for learning with kernels and noise

Siyi Yang, Naixu Guo, Miklós Sántha +1 more

At the interface of machine learning and quantum computing, an important question is what distributions can be learned provably with optimal sample complexities and with quantum-accelerated time complexities. In the classical case, Klivans and Goel discussed the Alphatron , an algorithm to learn distributions related to kernelized regression, which they also applied to the learning of two-layer neural networks. In this work, we provide quantum versions of the Alphatron in the fault-tolerant setting. In a well-defined learning model, this quantum algorithm is able to provide a polynomial speedup for a large range of parameters of the underlying concept class. We discuss two types of speedups, one for evaluating the kernel matrix and one for evaluating the gradient in the stochastic gradient descent procedure. We also discuss the quantum advantage in the context of learning of two-layer neural networks. Our work contributes to the study of quantum learning with kernels and from samples.

arXiv:2108.11670•Quantum•Nov 8, 2023•3 citations

Towards understanding the power of quantum kernels in the NISQ era

Xinbiao Wang, Yuxuan Du, Yong Luo +1 more

A key problem in the field of quantum computing is understanding whether quantum machine learning (QML) models implemented on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) machines can achieve quantum advantages. Recently, Huang et al. [Nat Commun 12, 2631] partially answered this question by the lens of quantum kernel learning. Namely, they exhibited that quantum kernels can learn specific datasets with lower generalization error over the optimal classical kernel methods. However, most of their results are established on the ideal setting and ignore the caveats of near-term quantum machines. To this end, a crucial open question is: does the power of quantum kernels still hold under the NISQ setting? In this study, we fill this knowledge gap by exploiting the power of quantum kernels when the quantum system noise and sample error are considered. Concretely, we first prove that the advantage of quantum kernels is vanished for large size of datasets, few number of measurements, and large system noise. With the aim of preserving the superiority of quantum kernels in the NISQ era, we further devise an effective method via indefinite kernel learning. Numerical simulations accord with our theoretical results. Our work provides theoretical guidance of exploring advanced quantum kernels to attain quantum advantages on NISQ devices.

arXiv:2103.16774•Quantum•Aug 30, 2021•88 citations

Exponential quantum advantages in learning quantum observables from classical data

Riccardo Molteni, Casper Gyurik, Vedran Dunjko

Abstract Quantum computers are believed to bring computational advantages in simulating quantum many-body systems. However, recent works have shown that classical machine learning algorithms are able to predict numerous properties of quantum systems with classical data. Despite examples of learning tasks with provable quantum advantages being proposed, they all involve cryptographic functions and do not represent any physical scenarios encountered in laboratory settings. In this paper, we prove quantum advantages for the physically relevant task of learning quantum observables from classical (measured-out) data. We consider two types of observables: first, we prove a learning advantage for linear combinations of Pauli strings, then we extend our results to a broader case of unitarily parametrized observables. For each case, we delineate sharp boundaries separating physically relevant tasks that admit efficient classical learning from those for which a quantum computer remains necessary for data analysis. Unlike previous works, our classical hardness results rely only on the weaker assumption that $$BQP$$ B Q P hard processes cannot be simulated by polynomial-size classical circuits, and we also provide a nontrivial quantum learning algorithm. Our results clarify when quantum resources are useful for learning problems in quantum many-body physics, and suggest practical directions in which quantum learning improvements may emerge.

arXiv:2405.02027•npj Quantum Information•Jan 10, 2026•6 citations
Abstract The use of quantum computation to speed-up machine learning algorithms is among the most exciting prospective applications in the NISQ era. Here, we focus on the quantum phase learning problem, which is crucially important in understanding many-particle quantum systems. We prove that, under widely believed complexity theory assumptions, quantum phase learning problem cannot be efficiently solved by machine learning algorithms using classical resources and classical data. Whereas using quantum data, we prove the universality of quantum kernel Alphatron in efficiently predicting quantum phases, indicating clear quantum advantages in such learning problems. We numerically benchmark the algorithm for a variety of problems, including recognizing symmetry-protected topological phases and symmetry-broken phases. Our results highlight the capability of quantum machine learning in efficient prediction of quantum phases of many-particle systems.
Abstract The use of quantum computation to speed-up machine learning algorithms is among the most exciting prospective applications in the NISQ era. Here, we focus on the quantum phase learning problem, which is crucially important in understanding many-particle quantum systems. We prove that, under widely believed complexity theory assumptions, quantum phase learning problem cannot be efficiently solved by machine learning algorithms using classical resources and classical data. Whereas using quantum data, we prove the universality of quantum kernel Alphatron in efficiently predicting quantum phases, indicating clear quantum advantages in such learning problems. We numerically benchmark the algorithm for a variety of problems, including recognizing symmetry-protected topological phases and symmetry-broken phases. Our results highlight the capability of quantum machine learning in efficient prediction of quantum phases of many-particle systems.
The application of quantum computation to accelerate machine learning algorithms is one of the most promising areas of research in quantum algorithms. In this paper, we explore the power of quantum learning algorithms in solving an important class of Quantum Phase Recognition (QPR) problems, which are crucially important in understanding many-particle quantum systems. We prove that, under widely believed complexity theory assumptions, there exists a wide range of QPR problems that cannot be efficiently solved by classical learning algorithms with classical resources. Whereas using a quantum computer, we prove the efficiency and robustness of quantum kernel methods in solving QPR problems through Linear order parameter Observables. We numerically benchmark our algorithm for a variety of problems, including recognizing symmetry-protected topological phases and symmetry-broken phases. Our results highlight the capability of quantum machine learning in predicting such quantum phase transitions in many-particle systems.
Classical machine learning (ML) provides a potentially powerful approach to solving challenging quantum many-body problems in physics and chemistry. However, the advantages of ML over traditional methods have not been firmly established. In this work, we prove that classical ML algorithms can efficiently predict ground-state properties of gapped Hamiltonians after learning from other Hamiltonians in the same quantum phase of matter. By contrast, under a widely accepted conjecture, classical algorithms that do not learn from data cannot achieve the same guarantee. We also prove that classical ML algorithms can efficiently classify a wide range of quantum phases. Extensive numerical experiments corroborate our theoretical results in a variety of scenarios, including Rydberg atom systems, two-dimensional random Heisenberg models, symmetry-protected topological phases, and topologically ordered phases.
At the interface of machine learning and quantum computing, an important question is what distributions can be learned provably with optimal sample complexities and with quantum-accelerated time complexities. In the classical case, Klivans and Goel discussed the Alphatron , an algorithm to learn distributions related to kernelized regression, which they also applied to the learning of two-layer neural networks. In this work, we provide quantum versions of the Alphatron in the fault-tolerant setting. In a well-defined learning model, this quantum algorithm is able to provide a polynomial speedup for a large range of parameters of the underlying concept class. We discuss two types of speedups, one for evaluating the kernel matrix and one for evaluating the gradient in the stochastic gradient descent procedure. We also discuss the quantum advantage in the context of learning of two-layer neural networks. Our work contributes to the study of quantum learning with kernels and from samples.
A key problem in the field of quantum computing is understanding whether quantum machine learning (QML) models implemented on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) machines can achieve quantum advantages. Recently, Huang et al. [Nat Commun 12, 2631] partially answered this question by the lens of quantum kernel learning. Namely, they exhibited that quantum kernels can learn specific datasets with lower generalization error over the optimal classical kernel methods. However, most of their results are established on the ideal setting and ignore the caveats of near-term quantum machines. To this end, a crucial open question is: does the power of quantum kernels still hold under the NISQ setting? In this study, we fill this knowledge gap by exploiting the power of quantum kernels when the quantum system noise and sample error are considered. Concretely, we first prove that the advantage of quantum kernels is vanished for large size of datasets, few number of measurements, and large system noise. With the aim of preserving the superiority of quantum kernels in the NISQ era, we further devise an effective method via indefinite kernel learning. Numerical simulations accord with our theoretical results. Our work provides theoretical guidance of exploring advanced quantum kernels to attain quantum advantages on NISQ devices.
Abstract Quantum computers are believed to bring computational advantages in simulating quantum many-body systems. However, recent works have shown that classical machine learning algorithms are able to predict numerous properties of quantum systems with classical data. Despite examples of learning tasks with provable quantum advantages being proposed, they all involve cryptographic functions and do not represent any physical scenarios encountered in laboratory settings. In this paper, we prove quantum advantages for the physically relevant task of learning quantum observables from classical (measured-out) data. We consider two types of observables: first, we prove a learning advantage for linear combinations of Pauli strings, then we extend our results to a broader case of unitarily parametrized observables. For each case, we delineate sharp boundaries separating physically relevant tasks that admit efficient classical learning from those for which a quantum computer remains necessary for data analysis. Unlike previous works, our classical hardness results rely only on the weaker assumption that BQPBQPBQP B Q P hard processes cannot be simulated by polynomial-size classical circuits, and we also provide a nontrivial quantum learning algorithm. Our results clarify when quantum resources are useful for learning problems in quantum many-body physics, and suggest practical directions in which quantum learning improvements may emerge.