Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Notes on the tunneling time and trajectory

Anedio Ranfagni, Daniela Mugnai

Published Jan 1, 1988• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

A note on the tunneling time problem

Francis E. Low, Paul F. Mende

Annals of Physics•Sep 1, 1991•61 citations

A note on traversal time for tunneling

A. M. Jayannavar

Pramana•Oct 1, 1987•13 citations

Bohm Trajectories and the Tunneling Time Problem

C. Richard Leavens, G. C. Aers

Springer series in surface sciences•Jan 1, 1996•2 citations

Bohm Trajectories and the Tunneling Time Problem

C. Richard Leavens, G. C. Aers

Springer series in surface sciences•Jan 1, 1993•30 citations

Trajectories and Traversal Times in Quantum Tunneling

Zhi Hong Huang

•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

Quantum tunneling dynamics using hydrodynamic trajectories

Eric R. Bittner

In this paper we compute quantum trajectories arising from Bohm’s causal description of quantum mechanics. Our computational methodology is based upon a finite-element moving least-squares method (MWLS) presented recently by Wyatt and co-workers [Lopreore and Wyatt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5190 (1999)]. This method treats the “particles” in the quantum Hamilton–Jacobi equation as Lagrangian fluid elements that carry the phase, S, and density, ρ, required to reconstruct the quantum wave function. Here, we compare results obtained via the MWLS procedure to exact results obtained either analytically or by numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Two systems are considered: first, dynamics in a harmonic well and second, tunneling dynamics in a double well potential. In the case of tunneling in the double well potential, the quantum potential acts to lower the barrier, separating the right- and left-hand sides of the well, permitting trajectories to pass from one side to another. However, as probability density passes from one side to the other, the effective barrier begins to rise and eventually will segregate trajectories in one side from the other. We note that the MWLS trajectories exhibited long time stability in the purely harmonic cases. However, this stability was not evident in the barrier crossing dynamics. Comparisons to exact trajectories obtained via wave packet calculations indicate that the MWLS trajectories tend to underestimate the effects of constructive and destructive interference effects.

arXiv:quant-ph/0001119•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jun 8, 2000•92 citations
In this paper we compute quantum trajectories arising from Bohm’s causal description of quantum mechanics. Our computational methodology is based upon a finite-element moving least-squares method (MWLS) presented recently by Wyatt and co-workers [Lopreore and Wyatt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5190 (1999)]. This method treats the “particles” in the quantum Hamilton–Jacobi equation as Lagrangian fluid elements that carry the phase, S, and density, ρ, required to reconstruct the quantum wave function. Here, we compare results obtained via the MWLS procedure to exact results obtained either analytically or by numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Two systems are considered: first, dynamics in a harmonic well and second, tunneling dynamics in a double well potential. In the case of tunneling in the double well potential, the quantum potential acts to lower the barrier, separating the right- and left-hand sides of the well, permitting trajectories to pass from one side to another. However, as probability density passes from one side to the other, the effective barrier begins to rise and eventually will segregate trajectories in one side from the other. We note that the MWLS trajectories exhibited long time stability in the purely harmonic cases. However, this stability was not evident in the barrier crossing dynamics. Comparisons to exact trajectories obtained via wave packet calculations indicate that the MWLS trajectories tend to underestimate the effects of constructive and destructive interference effects.